Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 at 4:21:38 AM UTC, kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Sunday, October 28, 2018 at 12:19:39 PM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> I just want to mention that sagenb 1.1.0 comes with docs installed in >> SAGE_LOCAL/share... >> so there is no regression - except I have no idea

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 07:12:29AM -0800, kcrisman wrote: > > > > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/repl/sage/repl/ipython_kernel/interact.html > > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/prep/Quickstarts/Interact.html > > > > > Thanks; I knew about the second one, since I wrote it :-) but the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

Thu 2019-03-07 17:38:09 UTC+1, Thierry: > > i am not sure how it is related, but one could imagine to keep an > history of Sage documentations of all official releases, with urls like > doc.sagemath.org/8.6 and doc.sagemath.org/latest pointing to the current > release. Seconded. For every

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

Hi, i am not sure how it is related, but one could imagine to keep an history of Sage documentations of all official releases, with urls like doc.sagemath.org/8.6 and doc.sagemath.org/latest pointing to the current release. Ciao, Thierry On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:27:43PM +0100, Samuel

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

The web archive ("internet wayback machine") has it. http://web.archive.org/web/20180729211816/http://doc.sagemath.org:80/html/en/reference/notebook/sagenb/notebook/interact.html Hopefully Harald can adjust how he builds the documentation for doc.sagemath.org and have it include the sagenb

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

> > > > > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/repl/sage/repl/ipython_kernel/interact.html > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/prep/Quickstarts/Interact.html > > Thanks; I knew about the second one, since I wrote it :-) but the first one is good to have on hand. Unfortunately, that means the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

Some documentation for interacts can be found at http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/repl/sage/repl/ipython_kernel/interact.html http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/prep/Quickstarts/Interact.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:53 PM kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Sunday, February 3, 2019 at 12:01:16 PM UTC-5, Harald Schilly wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:36 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: >>> >>> > So I just ran into this now that it is not in the "usual" place >>> >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

On Sunday, February 3, 2019 at 12:01:16 PM UTC-5, Harald Schilly wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:36 AM Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > >> > So I just ran into this now that it is not in the "usual" place >>

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:36 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > So I just ran into this now that it is not in the "usual" place > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/notebook/sagenb/notebook/interact.html#sagenb.notebook.interact.interact > > > > Now where do we find the interact documentation?

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 4:21 AM kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Sunday, October 28, 2018 at 12:19:39 PM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> I just want to mention that sagenb 1.1.0 comes with docs installed in >> SAGE_LOCAL/share... >> so there is no regression - except I have no idea how to properly

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

On Sunday, October 28, 2018 at 12:19:39 PM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I just want to mention that sagenb 1.1.0 comes with docs installed in > SAGE_LOCAL/share... > so there is no regression - except I have no idea how to properly link it > from Sage's docs. > > So I just ran into this

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

I just want to mention that sagenb 1.1.0 comes with docs installed in SAGE_LOCAL/share... so there is no regression - except I have no idea how to properly link it from Sage's docs. Dima On 28 Oct 2018 1:56 pm, "Erik Bray" wrote: On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 10:42 AM François Bissey wrote: > > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 10:42 AM François Bissey wrote: > > > > > On 14/10/2018, at 21:37, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > I am impressed by the number of persons > > I see still using the legacy notebook. > > The whole math department of university of Canterbury

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

On Sun, 14 Oct 2018, François Bissey wrote: I am impressed by the number of persons I see still using the legacy notebook. The whole math department of university of Canterbury (New Zealand) where I work for starter. They have heaps of legacy notebooks. University of Tampere has used legacy

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

+1 to the proposal. I think it may be a good idea to have only a brief statement about how to convert sws --> ipynb, so that when those who currently use sagenb will find transitioning to more up-to-date versions of sage simpler. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

> On 14/10/2018, at 21:37, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am impressed by the number of persons > I see still using the legacy notebook. The whole math department of university of Canterbury (New Zealand) where I work for starter. They have heaps of legacy

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

I agree with Volker here. Though we should never get rid of the converter .sws -> .ipynb. I am impressed by the number of persons I see still using the legacy notebook. Le 10/10/2018 à 22:18, Volker Braun a écrit : +1 to unconditional removal. Really its just sending confusing messages to users

[sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

+1 to the proposal on #25382. Best, Travis On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 3:27:59 PM UTC+10, John H Palmieri wrote: > > At https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25382 > , > >

[sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

+1 to unconditional removal. Really its just sending confusing messages to users looking for help. If you are new to Sage in 2018 you should never start sagenb. On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 7:27:59 AM UTC+2, John H Palmieri wrote: > > At https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25382, it is

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

Hi, I wrote much of sagenb and am why sagenb is currently not optional. I'm fine with removing it from sage and/or making it optional. William On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:43 AM Timo Kaufmann wrote: > > I'm also in favor. Besides being more complicated, I think doing something > different here

[sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

I'm also in favor. Besides being more complicated, I think doing something different here for python2 and python3 would be a bad idea. Am Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2018 07:27:59 UTC+2 schrieb John H Palmieri: > > At https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25382, it is being proposed to remove > the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

Anyhow, I am for removal these docs from Sage proper, (and making sagenb optional) On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 9:09 AM Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > > This is the alternative : what would need to be done to fix the same problem > in another way. > > Le mercredi 10 octobre 2018 10:08:00 UTC+2, Dima

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

This is the alternative : what would need to be done to fix the same problem in another way. Le mercredi 10 octobre 2018 10:08:00 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018, 08:16 Frédéric Chapoton, > wrote: > >> I agree with and support strongly this proposal of removal of

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

On Wed, 10 Oct 2018, 08:16 Frédéric Chapoton, wrote: > I agree with and support strongly this proposal of removal of sagenb doc, > which is a step towards having "make" (and not only "make build") being > working with python3. > > The alternative would require a *lot of work* on sagenb itself :

[sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

I agree with and support strongly this proposal of removal of sagenb doc, which is a step towards having "make" (and not only "make build") being working with python3. The alternative would require a *lot of work* on sagenb itself : * merge the deprecation pull request there * release a new