Florent Hivert wrote:
This is very strange ! I was successful in adding a random patch but trac
seems to refuse the one patch I want to add. The offending patch is at [0], if
someone has an idea of what is happening.
[0]
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:12:56AM +0100, leif wrote:
Florent Hivert wrote:
This is very strange ! I was successful in adding a random patch but trac
seems to refuse the one patch I want to add. The offending patch is at [0],
if
someone has an idea of what is happening.
[0]
On 2012-03-21 06:30, John H Palmieri wrote:
I have no idea if this is a new issue, but the attachments for
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12684 don't view quite
correctly: there are some lines at the end of the patch which move files
around, and those are not visible when you view
This seems to be happening much more frequently right now. Could someone
with root on boxen either restart the postgres server or kill some of the
postgres processes?
I'm afraid this is my fault: I've started a few long running processes
while experimenting with SQL reports and can't kill them.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:32 AM, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
This seems to be happening much more frequently right now. Could someone
with root on boxen either restart the postgres server or kill some of the
postgres processes?
Done. I don't know if anybody also did so in the last
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:20 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:32 AM, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
This seems to be happening much more frequently right now. Could someone
with root on boxen either restart the postgres server or kill some of the
Hi there,
Right now trac is perfectly working (I was able to create ticket #12717),
except that I can't manage to upload any attachment. Firefox show the
uploading busy for hours. Is it me or a general problem ?
Cheers,
Florent
--
To post to this group, send an email to
I don't know exactly what happened, but the folder
/var/trac/sage_trac/attachments/ticket/12717 didn't exist even though the
ticket existed. I tried attaching a file to the ticket, succeeded, and now
the folder exists. Try again?
David
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:55, Florent Hivert
Hi David,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:59:57AM -0700, David Roe wrote:
I don't know exactly what happened, but the folder
/var/trac/sage_trac/attachments/ticket/12717 didn't exist even though the
ticket existed. I tried attaching a file to the ticket, succeeded, and now
the folder
Hi David,
I don't know exactly what happened, but the folder
/var/trac/sage_trac/attachments/ticket/12717 didn't exist even though the
ticket existed. I tried attaching a file to the ticket, succeeded, and
now the folder exists. Try again?
Thanks for your help.
I tried Firefox,
I have no idea what's going on, but I succeeded in uploading it. It's now
attached to 12717.
David
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:23, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@lri.fr wrote:
Hi David,
I don't know exactly what happened, but the folder
/var/trac/sage_trac/attachments/ticket/12717
Perhaps you just had a flaky connection, and the fact that the same
file kept failing was just a coincidence?
There are some errors in the trac log like
[...]
File /usr/lib/python2.5/cgi.py, line 691, in read_lines
self.read_lines_to_outerboundary()
File /usr/lib/python2.5/cgi.py, line
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:03:25PM -0700, Jonathan Bober wrote:
Perhaps you just had a flaky connection, and the fact that the same
file kept failing was just a coincidence?
There are some errors in the trac log like
[...]
File /usr/lib/python2.5/cgi.py, line 691, in
Is there another user that could try uploading the patch from your
computer? I seem to recall you've had difficulty with trac before. It
would be nice to figure out if it was based on your trac account or your
computer somehow.
David
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 14:00, Florent Hivert
On 20 Mrz., 10:45, P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 4:43:41 PM UTC+8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-03-20 09:17, David Roe wrote:
What link is broken? I'm finding the link to
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/raw-attachment/ticket/8109/trac_81...
from
I noticed that the loading
of http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/admin/accounts/users now takes
significantly longer. It used to take less then a second but when I now go
there to create a new user it takes at least 5 seconds (if not more). The
stupid thing is that after having created a new
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:58 AM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 20 Mrz., 10:45, P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 4:43:41 PM UTC+8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-03-20 09:17, David Roe wrote:
What link is broken? I'm finding the link to
Le mardi 20 mars 2012 12:33:27 UTC+1, Maarten Derickx a écrit :
I noticed that the loading of
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/admin/accounts/users now takes
significantly longer. It used to take less then a second but when I now go
there to create a new user it takes at least 5
David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu writes:
The patchbot link needs to be inserted into another file in this folder, but
I'm not sure what yet. I don't have permission to edit these files, and I
need
to sleep. If someone else can figure out what changes need to be made that
would be great.
I agree that it's a problem, but I don't know what caused the change.
David
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 16:15, Maarten Derickx
m.derickx.stud...@gmail.comwrote:
Le mardi 20 mars 2012 12:33:27 UTC+1, Maarten Derickx a écrit :
I noticed that the loading of http://trac.sagemath.org/**
Le mercredi 21 mars 2012 00:22:10 UTC+1, David Roe a écrit :
I agree that it's a problem, but I don't know what caused the change.
David
I don't know either, but the sage logs tell me what your ip adress is :P, I
was looking trough the logs to see what happend if I requested the page and
Whatever is going on, it has to do with trac, and not the database, it
seems. apache runs at 100% for a while before returning a response
whenever that page is loaded. I wonder if perhaps the issue is with
one of the plugins.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Maarten Derickx
I have no idea if this is a new issue, but the attachments for
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12684 don't view quite correctly:
there are some lines at the end of the patch which move files around, and
those are not visible when you view the attachment.
(This may be just the same as
The download image next to the files/patches attached to a ticket is no
longer showing. Looking at the source, it seems that it is missing this img
line:
img src=/sage_trac/chrome/common/download.png alt=Download/
On Monday, March 19, 2012 10:20:02 AM UTC+8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
Trac is
On 2012-03-19 01:34, Hugh Thomas wrote:
Twice, today, instead of the page I was expecting, trac produced
something like this:
This happens all the time, it's not related to the Trac upgrade.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
Thanks, David and Jeroen. I haven't used trac that much, and I guess I
just hadn't encountered that behaviour before, so I thought it might be
related.
cheers,
Hugh
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
I just made a few more changes to the trac/apache configuration.
Apache now serves up (some) trac static files directly, instead of
having trac do it. This should give better performance, but I don't
know whether or not it will actually be anything noticeable.
I also decreased the maximum number
On 19 Mrz., 05:42, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
On Mar 18, 9:31 pm, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
Known issues:
Known improvements:
* Comments can be edited.
... whether that's an improvement ... ;-)
* Seems super-fast compared to before.
??? trac is mostly as
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:07 PM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 19 Mrz., 05:42, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
On Mar 18, 9:31 pm, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
Known issues:
Known improvements:
* Comments can be edited.
... whether that's an improvement ...
On 19 Mrz., 05:28, Justin C. Walker jus...@mac.com wrote:
- I'm with Lief: I don't like the centering (although if you narrow the page,
you get a narrowed view, which is good; no horizontal scrolling needed).
Well, of course one can, but that's very inconvenient.
I usually have many tabs
On Mar 19, 4:14 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:07 PM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 19 Mrz., 05:42, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
On Mar 18, 9:31 pm, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
Known issues:
Known improvements:
*
Twice, today, instead of the page I was expecting, trac produced something
like this:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Trac-0.11.5-py2.5.egg/trac/web/api.py,
line 377, in send_error
'text/html')
File
Strange. We haven't actually done anything yet related to the upgrade, so
I don't know what to tell you.
David
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 20:34, Hugh Thomas hugh.ross.tho...@gmail.comwrote:
Twice, today, instead of the page I was expecting, trac produced something
like this:
Traceback (most
David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu writes:
Strange. We haven't actually done anything yet related to the upgrade, so I
don't know what to tell you.
David
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 20:34, Hugh Thomas hugh.ross.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
Twice, today, instead of the page I was expecting, trac
Trac will go down in 5 minutes.
David
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 21:10, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu writes:
Strange. We haven't actually done anything yet related to the upgrade,
so I
don't know what to tell you.
David
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012
Trac is more or less working, please report any bugs.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 18:47, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
Trac will go down in 5 minutes.
David
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 21:10, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu writes:
Strange. We
On 19 Mrz., 03:20, R. Andrew Ohana andrew.oh...@gmail.com wrote:
Trac is more or less working, please report any bugs.
More or less? :-)
Do the trac pages have to be centered?
To me it's a bit inconvenient, and it *may* give problems if the
(preview) pages get extremely wide due to some plugin
On 19 Mrz., 05:10, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 19 Mrz., 03:20, R. Andrew Ohana andrew.oh...@gmail.com wrote:
Do the trac pages have to be centered?
To me it's a bit inconvenient, and it *may* give problems if the
(preview) pages get extremely wide due to some plugin weirdness, not
On Monday, 19 March 2012 10:20:02 UTC+8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
Trac is more or less working, please report any bugs.
where is the patchbot icon on the tickets? It has vanished.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
On Mar 18, 2012, at 19:20 , R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
Trac is more or less working, please report any bugs.
A couple of minor glitches:
- I refreshed a previously-open page displaying #12555. Before the refresh, I
was shown as logged in. After the refresh, I was not. A second refresh got me
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 21:10, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 19 Mrz., 03:20, R. Andrew Ohana andrew.oh...@gmail.com wrote:
Trac is more or less working, please report any bugs.
More or less? :-)
Known issues:
* The link to the patchbot has disappeared (thanks for pointing that out
On Mar 18, 9:31 pm, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
Known issues:
Known improvements:
* Comments can be edited.
* Seems super-fast compared to before.
* No need to scroll bottom to top to bottom to preview changes to the
description, there are link-buttons to jump back/forth.
42 matches
Mail list logo
