On Jun 7, 4:19 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
I'm randomly running into segfaults when multiplying matrices over the
integers, in the course of doing basic modular symbols calculations.
For example, sometimes (but not always), this crashes:
sage: M =
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Jun 7, 4:19 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
I'm randomly running into segfaults when multiplying matrices over the
integers, in the course of doing basic modular symbols calculations.
For example,
On 2012-05-27, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Le dimanche 27 mai, Juanjo a écrit:
A patch has been uploaded to ECL's bug tracker. Please report whether
it works for you.
I see the message about it in the bug tracker, but no file is
attached.
I see that this is the patch,
Le dimanche 27 mai, Dima Pasechnik a écrit:
Great! So this has to get into our ECL spkg...
Yes, but first it should get proper testing, see :
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12586
Snark
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
On 2012-05-25, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:
That's what i meant. What i wanted to ask is if the ubuntu chroot
method will also be officially supported.
For this one needs hardware that can test of such a setup
in a reliable automated way.
I have no idea how Android developers do testing ---
Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com writes:
On 2012-05-25, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:
That's what i meant. What i wanted to ask is if the ubuntu chroot
method will also be officially supported.
For this one needs hardware that can test of such a setup
in a reliable automated way.
I have
On 2012-05-26, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Le dimanche 20 mai, Julien Puydt a écrit:
sage -t --long -force_lib
devel/sage/sage/interfaces/maxima_abstract.py
**
File
Le samedi 26 mai, Dima Pasechnik a écrit:
On 2012-05-26, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Le dimanche 20 mai, Julien Puydt a écrit:
sage -t --long -force_lib
devel/sage/sage/interfaces/maxima_abstract.py
**
Let's make ARM an officially supported platform for
Sage!
Does that include android?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:45 AM, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:
Let's make ARM an officially supported platform for
Sage!
Does that include android?
For now, I think it means Ubuntu on ARM, which includes Android in the
sense of using a chroot install of Ubuntu. I don't know if building
That's what i meant. What i wanted to ask is if the ubuntu chroot
method will also be officially supported.
On 25 mayo, 17:21, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:45 AM, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:
Let's make ARM an officially supported platform for
Sage!
Le mercredi 23 mai, mmarco a écrit:
I did build the chroot image, but when i test it sage fails at startup
because gap cannot load several packages. It seems that they are not
installed. I suspect that those packages are missing. Does the tarball
that you uploaded work for you on its own?
At
I am uploading now a tarball with the necesary files to run sage on
rooted android devices. Uploading should finish in a few minutes.
Please test it if you have another device.
In order to run it you need:
-an android device with 3.5gb of disk space available (in principle,
it should be posible
On Thursday, 24 May 2012 16:56:39 UTC+2, Snark wrote:
Le mercredi 23 mai, mmarco a écrit:
I did build the chroot image, but when i test it sage fails at startup
because gap cannot load several packages. It seems that they are not
installed. I suspect that those packages are missing.
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Dima Pasechnik
Sure, I (perhaps with Keshav as a backup --- Keshav, would you mind
helping?) can do the admin.
I suppose 10 hours is still acceptable for a build (I expect it actually be
quicker with a HD,
as the solid state drive in my AC100 is kind of slow,
I did build the chroot image, but when i test it sage fails at startup
because gap cannot load several packages. It seems that they are not
installed. I suspect that those packages are missing. Does the tarball
that you uploaded work for you on its own?
--
To post to this group, send an email to
Le lundi 21 mai, mmarco a écrit:
I am a bit busy now, but if you pass me a tarball with the compiled
sage directory in it i can try to create a chroot environment to be
run in (rooted) android devices.
Sorry it took so long -- apparently I've been slow to ask for an
account :-P :
Le mardi 22 mai, Julien Puydt a écrit:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jpuydt/sage-5.0-armv7l-Linux.tar.bz2
I forgot :
$ md5sum sage-5.0-armv7l-Linux.tar.bz2
ad53951e62c802071844f9bc6d5763d8 sage-5.0-armv7l-Linux.tar.bz2
if you don't get the same, perhaps the upload isn't finished yet
I am a bit busy now, but if you pass me a tarball with the compiled
sage directory in it i can try to create a chroot environment to be
run in (rooted) android devices.
William Stein told recentely that he could buy an arm buildbot, adding
then arm to the list of supported architectures. Do you
Le lundi 21 mai, mmarco a écrit:
I am a bit busy now, but if you pass me a tarball with the compiled
sage directory in it i can try to create a chroot environment to be
run in (rooted) android devices.
I'm running a ./sage -bdist 5.0 right now for you :-)
The question is where I'll put the
Dear William,
please provide Mr. Snark with an account on boxen!
Thanks,
Dima
On Monday, 21 May 2012 18:11:36 UTC+2, Snark wrote:
Le lundi 21 mai, mmarco a écrit:
I am a bit busy now, but if you pass me a tarball with the compiled
sage directory in it i can try to create a chroot
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear William,
please provide Mr. Snark with an account on boxen!
Mr. Snark -- please write to me offlist at wst...@gmail.com.
Thanks,
Dima
On Monday, 21 May 2012 18:11:36 UTC+2, Snark wrote:
Le lundi 21 mai,
Which OS did you build it in?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL:
Le dimanche 20 mai, mmarco a écrit:
Which OS did you build it in?
Ubuntu 12.04 armhf.
Snark on #sagemath
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit
Le Thu, 10 May 2012 22:37:15 -0700 (PDT),
P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Friday, May 11, 2012 1:19:04 AM UTC+8, Snark wrote:
2) I understand the convenience of being able to install sage
with minimum requirements in restricted cases, but still don't get
why such a nice
I see the problem. Originally, Sage (or you) decided to install the GCC
package within Sage. As a consequence, MPIR was built without the C++
interface. From the MPIR log:
Building a reduced version of MPIR to bootstrap GCC.
MPIR will later get rebuilt (with the C++ interface and static
On 05/10/2012 03:37 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
I see the problem. Originally, Sage (or you) decided to install the GCC
package within Sage. As a consequence, MPIR was built without the C++
interface. From the MPIR log:
Building a reduced version of MPIR to bootstrap GCC.
MPIR will later get
On Thursday, 10 May 2012 07:42:44 UTC, P Purkayastha wrote:
On 05/10/2012 03:37 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
I see the problem. Originally, Sage (or you) decided to install the GCC
package within Sage. As a consequence, MPIR was built without the C++
interface. From the MPIR log:
On 2012-05-10 12:56, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
it seems to me that missing gfortran alone should not trigger a build of
the gcc spkg.
Several packages need a Fortran compiler. So, if gfortran is missing we
*must* build GCC.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
On Thursday, 10 May 2012 11:50:39 UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-05-10 12:56, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
it seems to me that missing gfortran alone should not trigger a build of
the gcc spkg.
Several packages need a Fortran compiler.
sure, I am perfectly aware of this...
So, if
On 2012-05-10 14:03, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
This is a huge overkill, at least on Linux, where gfortran is just one
call to package manager away
If the user has root access, then yes.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an
On 05/10/2012 08:05 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-05-10 14:03, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
This is a huge overkill, at least on Linux, where gfortran is just one
call to package manager away
If the user has root access, then yes.
Yes. I only needed to install gfortran system-wide to stop gcc
On Thursday, 10 May 2012 12:05:31 UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-05-10 14:03, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
This is a huge overkill, at least on Linux, where gfortran is just one
call to package manager away
If the user has root access, then yes.
IMHO the top-level README.txt should be
Le jeudi 10 mai, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit:
On 2012-05-10 14:03, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
This is a huge overkill, at least on Linux, where gfortran is just
one call to package manager away
If the user has root access, then yes.
1) There's no need for root access to install a compiler in one's
On Friday, May 11, 2012 1:19:04 AM UTC+8, Snark wrote:
2) I understand the convenience of being able to install sage
with minimum requirements in restricted cases, but still don't get why
such a nice endeavour means all other cases must endure a long
compilation and big installations --
On 2012-05-09 09:34, P Purkayastha wrote:
And I set the following CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS (and MAKE is empty):
||
~/Installations/sage-5.0.rc0»exportCFLAGS=-march=native -O3 -pipe
~/Installations/sage-5.0.rc0»exportCXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
What if you don't use -march=native? Could you recompile mpir and
Actually, I already tried that. It fails in the same way.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.bewrote:
On 2012-05-09 09:34, P Purkayastha wrote:
And I set the following CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS (and MAKE is empty):
||
On 2012-05-09 09:52, P Purkayastha wrote:
Actually, I already tried that. It fails in the same way.
And without setting any CFLAGS?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.bewrote:
On 2012-05-09 09:52, P Purkayastha wrote:
Actually, I already tried that. It fails in the same way.
And without setting any CFLAGS
That's what I meant. Without having set anything. Just plain make.
--
To post to
On 05/09/2012 03:57 PM, P Purkayastha wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be
mailto:jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2012-05-09 09:52, P Purkayastha wrote:
Actually, I already tried that. It fails in the same way.
And without setting any
On 2012-05-09 11:45, P Purkayastha wrote:
On 05/09/2012 03:57 PM, P Purkayastha wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be
mailto:jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2012-05-09 09:52, P Purkayastha wrote:
Actually, I already tried that. It fails in
On 05/09/2012 05:49 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-05-09 11:45, P Purkayastha wrote:
On 05/09/2012 03:57 PM, P Purkayastha wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Jeroen Demeyerjdeme...@cage.ugent.be
mailto:jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2012-05-09 09:52, P Purkayastha wrote:
On 2012-05-09 13:06, P Purkayastha wrote:
The build log is attached.
The problem is actually with MPIR, can you send me the MPIR log file?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
On 05/09/2012 11:08 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-05-09 13:06, P Purkayastha wrote:
The build log is attached.
The problem is actually with MPIR, can you send me the MPIR log file?
Hi Jeroen,
I am currently not physically near that machine (and I forgot to enable
ssh on it since it is
Le mardi 01 mai, Dima Pasechnik a écrit:
I suppose 10 hours is still acceptable for a build (I expect it
actually be quicker with a HD,
as the solid state drive in my AC100 is kind of slow, and might take
a lot of wallclock time
during the build).
More memory will also shorten the build
On 2012-05-01 17:38, William Stein wrote:
Thanks for researching this! So I could buy a Trim-Slice H250 for
about $350, get a name assigned to it (trim.math.washington.edu)? and
put it in our server room. But it will take 10 hours to build sage.
10 hours isn't so bad. We already have 3
On 2012-05-01 00:08, Volker Braun wrote:
(like, do binutils support SSE4?)
MPIR does this.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2012-05-01 17:38, William Stein wrote:
Thanks for researching this! So I could buy a Trim-Slice H250 for
about $350, get a name assigned to it (trim.math.washington.edu)? and
put it in our server room. But it
On May 2, 12:01 pm, Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu
wrote:
I just built sage-5.0.rc0 on FreeBSD. When I do make test, one of the
test failures is puzzling me:
sage -t -force_lib devel/sage/sage/tests/startup.py
On 2012-05-02 18:50, William Stein wrote:
Question: I have an old atom N270 netbook with Linux. Would it be
useful for me to turn this on and put on the internet for sage build
testing?
Just do it, so I can play with it :-)
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 4:01:09 PM UTC, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I just built sage-5.0.rc0 on FreeBSD. When I do make test, one of the
test failures is puzzling me:
sage -t -force_lib devel/sage/sage/tests/startup.py
Question: I have an old atom N270 netbook with Linux. Would it be
useful for me to turn this on and put on the internet for sage build
testing?
-- William
I have one of those, and i did compile sage a couple of times there
with no problems. It shouldn't be different than any other x86
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-04-29, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2012-04-28 20:44, mmarco wrote:
On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 3:38:26 PM UTC, William wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On 2012-04-29, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-04-28 20:44, mmarco
Hi,
gcc was installed by Sage. You can find the install log here -
http://www.imsc.res.in/~rajeev/install.log
Rajeev
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Did your compilation build the bundled gcc or did it use the system gcc? For
example, is there a
Given that compiler optimizations are likely to use new additions to the
ISA, I propose that our strategy for deciding whether or not to build gcc
should be:
1) use OS provided gcc if it works fine (of course)
2) build our own gcc on OSX (very popular and hopelessly broken, but at
least we
On 2012-04-30 16:36, Volker Braun wrote:
Given that compiler optimizations are likely to use new additions to the
ISA, I propose that our strategy for deciding whether or not to build
gcc should be:
1) use OS provided gcc if it works fine (of course)
2) build our own gcc on OSX (very
On 2012-04-29, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2012-04-28 20:44, mmarco wrote:
Will some day ARM be one of the platforms oficially supported?
I guess a platform can only be truly officially supported if there is a
buildbot for it. If we don't test on ARM, sooner or later
Essentially by maintaining a list of gcc versions / architectures that work
well enough with reduced optimizations, and that are hopelessly broken.
This can just be some shell script that shitlists specific compilers...
On Monday, April 30, 2012 10:41:11 AM UTC-4, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-04-29, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2012-04-28 20:44, mmarco wrote:
Will some day ARM be one of the platforms oficially supported?
I guess a platform can only be truly officially supported if
Compiling sage in my tablet was so slow that i even considered
emulating an arm system through qemu as an alternative (although it
would probably be even slower, a pc is better suited for long and
intensive cpu usage than an android device).
Regarding the OS for a buildbot, i would really
On 04/30/12 03:45 AM, leif wrote:
On Apr 29, 9:23 pm, Volker Braunvbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Its pretty clear that this version does not support SSE4.
... and, frankly speaking, one shouldn't be surprised that Sage
doesn't support ancient Linux distros, at least not out-of-the-box.
There
On 2012-04-30 22:39, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
But perhaps an option to use a more
generic set of instructions would be nice.
To me, it just shows we really need to implement good default CFLAGS
instead of stupidly using -march=native as in the ECM spkg.
It would mean its possible to
distribute
On 30 April 2012 16:23, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Essentially by maintaining a list of gcc versions / architectures that work
well enough with reduced optimizations, and that are hopelessly broken. This
can just be some shell script that shitlists specific compilers...
A
Autoconf-style tests would be nice but I think it'll be painful to write
tests for obscure asm issues (like, do binutils support SSE4?). Or
compliler releases that die in an ICE after compiling pari for a while.
Maybe we should have a combination of both, first autoconf tests and then
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-04-29, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2012-04-28 20:44, mmarco wrote:
Will some day ARM be one of the platforms oficially supported?
I guess a
Can you try this version:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12830
On Sunday, April 29, 2012 12:41:06 PM UTC-4, Rajeev wrote:
Hi,
I got the following error while compiling sage-5.0.beta14. I had got
the same error with sage-5.0.beta13 which I reported earlier.
libtool: compile:
Hi,
I get the same error. I used the following commands -
$ pwd
/home/rajeev/bin/sage-5.0.beta14
$ ./sage -f
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/leif/Sage/spkgs/ecm-6.3.p7.spkg
Rajeev
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you try this version:
Seems like you have outdated binutils, the assembler doesn't understand the
gcc output. What is the output of as --version?
On Sunday, April 29, 2012 12:58:48 PM UTC-4, Rajeev wrote:
Hi,
I get the same error. I used the following commands -
$ pwd
/home/rajeev/bin/sage-5.0.beta14
$
Hi,
Here's the assembler's info -
$ as --version
GNU assembler 2.16.91.0.5 20051219 (SUSE Linux)
Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
the GNU General Public License. This program has absolutely no warranty.
This
Its pretty clear that this version does not support SSE4.
On Sunday, April 29, 2012 2:07:53 PM UTC-4, Rajeev wrote:
Hi,
Here's the assembler's info -
$ as --version
GNU assembler 2.16.91.0.5 20051219 (SUSE Linux)
Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free
Did your compilation build the bundled gcc or did it use the system gcc?
For example, is there a $SAGE_LOCAL/bin/gcc in your incomplete compile? If
you can, post the whole log e.g. to pastebin.
On Sunday, April 29, 2012 2:07:53 PM UTC-4, Rajeev wrote:
Hi,
Here's the assembler's info -
On Apr 29, 9:23 pm, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Its pretty clear that this version does not support SSE4.
... and, frankly speaking, one shouldn't be surprised that Sage
doesn't support ancient Linux distros, at least not out-of-the-box.
There are a couple of ways to fix / work
On 2012-04-28, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi,
here is a new report on the status of sage on ARM (ubuntu) : I just got
a successful build of 5.0.beta14 -- no patch, no special spkg, just the
bare, unadorned, ugly-as-can-be 5.0.beta14.
So 5.0.beta14 will stay in History as
Le samedi 28 avril, Dima Pasechnik a écrit:
On 2012-04-28, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi,
here is a new report on the status of sage on ARM (ubuntu) : I just
got a successful build of 5.0.beta14 -- no patch, no special spkg,
just the bare, unadorned, ugly-as-can-be
Will some day ARM be one of the platforms oficially supported?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
On 2012-04-28 20:44, mmarco wrote:
Will some day ARM be one of the platforms oficially supported?
I guess a platform can only be truly officially supported if there is a
buildbot for it. If we don't test on ARM, sooner or later something
will break.
--
To post to this group, send an email to
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we get Lion on bsd.math.washington.edu ?
I could, but then we will no longer have a 10.6 build/test machine, I
think, and that would be bad.
Also, I can't do this
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 07:08, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we get Lion on bsd.math.washington.edu ?
I could, but then we will no longer have a 10.6
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:31 PM, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
As for why your viewpoint might be harmful: I have heard anecdotes of
people
not wanting to release their code because it was ugly, or nonstandard, or
difficult to use, etc. As long as the response that they are going to
Can we get Lion on bsd.math.washington.edu ?
sqrt5 is down again...
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we get Lion on bsd.math.washington.edu ?
I could, but then we will no longer have a 10.6 build/test machine, I
think, and that would be bad.
Also, I can't do this until next week, since I'm in San Diego right now.
Le 04/02/2012 07:39, Jonathan Bober a écrit :
For another example: I recently tried to compile some of my own code using
clang++ and discovered that I am not allowed to do
void f(int j) {
complexdouble x[j];
[...]
}
even though g++ accepts that. ( See
I agree of course that we should converse in a civil manner.
On Friday, February 3, 2012 10:39:45 PM UTC-8, Jonathan Bober wrote:
In general, person X might use nonstandard GNU extension Y for many
reasons,
In my experience, it usually boils down to
5) Person used language extension
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:04 AM, John H Palmieri
jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:59:45 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:39 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:43 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Friday, February 3, 2012 8:33:53 AM UTC-8, William wrote:
Just to clarify, does gcc-4.2 *not* come with the latex XCode 4.x, but
it came with earlier XCode 4.x's?I have gcc-4.2 on my laptop, and
I've never installed anything but XCode 4.x on it.
Just curious.
I think that it came
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.netwrote:
But it makes the code unportable. What hope do we have with the Sun/Oracle
compiler if idiots use non-standard C? What hope do we have if we try to
build on Windows at some point in the future using a native
As for why your viewpoint might be harmful: I have heard anecdotes of
people
not wanting to release their code because it was ugly, or nonstandard, or
difficult to use, etc. As long as the response that they are going to
receive
it along the lines of the above, that viewpoint is valid, even
On Wednesday, February 1, 2012 5:01:41 AM UTC+8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:04, John H Palmieri jhpalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:59:45 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:39 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 04:46, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2012 5:01:41 AM UTC+8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:04, John H Palmieri jhpalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:59:45 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
On
On Feb 1, 2012, at 04:46 , Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2012 5:01:41 AM UTC+8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:04, John H Palmieri jhpalm...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I've started looking into the difficulties of getting sage to build
with clang (on
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:04, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:59:45 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:39 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:43 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon,
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01:41 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
(Beyond the issue of fortran) I'm not sure if it will be possible to
build all of the sage libraries with clang. For instance, it currently
doesn't yet support nested functions, which I know at least ratpoints
uses.
C
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:13, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01:41 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
(Beyond the issue of fortran) I'm not sure if it will be possible to
build all of the sage libraries with clang. For instance, it currently
doesn't
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01:41 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:04, John H Palmieri jhpalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:59:45 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:39 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com
wrote:
What I'm trying to say is: Upstream needs to be informed that they
shouldn't use non-standard C extensions. Nested functions especially are a
bad design choice in a world that is moving away from executable stacks.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
On 01/31/12 09:20 PM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:13, Volker Braunvbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01:41 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
(Beyond the issue of fortran) I'm not sure if it will be possible to
build all of the sage libraries with
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 15:52, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 01/31/12 09:20 PM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:13, Volker Braunvbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01:41 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
(Beyond the issue of
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 14:13, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01:41 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:04, John H Palmieri jhpalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:59:45 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:59:45 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:39 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:43 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:26 AM, John H Palmieri jhpalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
