On 28 August 2012 20:55, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
See the exchange below. I'm curious if there is anybody reading this
who would want to manage a bunch of Virtualbox VM's, if we had a
server *devoted* solely to running them, all for making Sage build in
a much wider range
Hi,
On 29 August 2012 06:38, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 28 August 2012 20:55, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
See the exchange below. I'm curious if there is anybody reading this
who would want to manage a bunch of Virtualbox VM's, if we had a
server
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:05:56 +
Jan Groenewald j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
Hi,
On 29 August 2012 06:38, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 28 August 2012 20:55, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
See the exchange below. I'm curious if there is anybody reading
Hi
Also, the 2GB is a requirement for running graphics.
This is not even necessary for notebook testing.
You can install 1GB virtual machines and stop the
GUI on them.
Regards,
Jan
On 29 August 2012 09:46, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:05:56 +
Jan
On 2012-08-29 09:05, Jan Groenewald wrote:
Two Gigabytes is sufficient for each for RAM.
If you add swap space, perhaps yes. But 2GB is not sufficient neither
for building the documentation nor for running all doctests in Sage.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On 29 August 2012 08:05, Jan Groenewald j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
The four (or six) volunteers are presumably adept at installing a machine,
adding
buildbot_slave and auto updates, and repsonding every few months to an
anomaly.
There could be a reasonable argument made for not updating them,
On 29 August 2012 08:05, Jan Groenewald j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
I'm not sure I understand completely. My back-of-the-envelope calculation
came out
an order of magnitude differently.
Em, that's a big difference.
Two Gigabytes is sufficient for each for RAM.
I don't believe it is. I think
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:46:23 AM UTC+1, Burcin Erocal wrote:
It is possible to script the creation of virtual machines:
If you only need to do it once then it is my experience that its easier to
do it manually (even if that means going through a slow vnc)
So in theory, many more
Hi,
See the exchange below. I'm curious if there is anybody reading this
who would want to manage a bunch of Virtualbox VM's, if we had a
server *devoted* solely to running them, all for making Sage build in
a much wider range of distros. This would take a person with a very
particular set of
Hi
Perhaps it need not be one person. I might be interested in all supported
versions of Ubuntu and Debian on 32 and 64 bit.
Regards,
Jan
On 28 August 2012 19:55, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
See the exchange below. I'm curious if there is anybody reading this
who would want
Me too for the Ubuntu family, but probably I can learn in half an hour to
be useful also on Fedora and OpenSuSE.
Andrea Lazzarotto
(From Android)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To post to this group, send email to
11 matches
Mail list logo
