Re: [sage-devel] please review #18320

2015-05-19 Thread mmarco
In either case, this isn't a good solution to the long-standing patches-arent- being-reviewed-in-a-timely-manner problem to which I have no solution except yet another attempt at an IRC sage hour a week where we all review/triage stuff. That IRC hour sounds like a nice idea.

Re: [sage-devel] please review #18320

2015-05-18 Thread kcrisman
There are a *lot* of tickets which are short, fix bugs, increase speed and are waiting for reviews. If all authors are advertising their tickets it will become a nightmare on sage-devel. If you want your ticket reviewed, it would be better: - looks for somebody that is likely to do

Re: [sage-devel] please review #18320

2015-05-18 Thread John Cremona
One reason for setting up the other lists such as sage-nt (for number theory) and sage-algebra was to provide a place for such requests. But of course those lists will never cover everything. I think that Martin (co-organiser with William and me of Sage Days 6 in 2007) has enough

Re: [sage-devel] please review #18320

2015-05-18 Thread Vincent Delecroix
On 18/05/15 20:43, John Cremona wrote: One reason for setting up the other lists such as sage-nt (for number theory) and sage-algebra was to provide a place for such requests. But of course those lists will never cover everything. Agreed. I think that Martin (co-organiser with William and me

Re: [sage-devel] please review #18320

2015-05-18 Thread William Stein
Hi, I personally have the exact opposite opinion about this. I wish way *more* people would advertise what they are doing to improve sage on Sage-devel. Rather than making sage-devel a nightmare I think it would make sage devel even more useful and interesting. I welcome such posts from

Re: [sage-devel] please review #18320

2015-05-18 Thread Martin Albrecht
Hi Vincent, no hard feelings at all! It's hard to figure out a good balance for these kinds of things and one way is to try it out: I sent a request and people who object to such requests …object. Then we discuss :) Back to the topic of discussion: I guess I'm up for more such requests on

Re: [sage-devel] please review #18320

2015-05-18 Thread Jakob Kroeker
In either case, this isn't a good solution to the long-standing patches-arent- being-reviewed-in-a-timely- manner problem to which I have no solution except yet another attempt at an IRC sage hour a week where we all review/triage stuff. What is about occasional time-limited (to prevent

Re: [sage-devel] please review #18320

2015-05-18 Thread kcrisman
Some people are allowed for this kind of request and others not? Very friendly. What about the following imaginary e-mail: hey, this is my first ticket. Does anybody want to review it? Actually, my hope is that the community would jump on that email saying me me me! let me review

[sage-devel] please review #18320

2015-05-17 Thread Martin Albrecht
Hi all, http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18320 fixes a performance issue with polynomial sequences which are used for multivariate polynomials to e.g. store Gröbner bases and stuff. The patch is very short, it would be nice if someone could look at it as it makes a huge difference for large

Re: [sage-devel] please review #18320

2015-05-17 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Hi Martin, There are a *lot* of tickets which are short, fix bugs, increase speed and are waiting for reviews. If all authors are advertising their tickets it will become a nightmare on sage-devel. If you want your ticket reviewed, it would be better: - looks for somebody that is likely to do