Le mercredi 19 janvier 2022 à 14:44:29 UTC+1, kcrisman a écrit :
> In addition, for me its a matter of sustainability to use things as long
>> as they work.
>
>
> +1
>
+1. And important in more ways than mathematical...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> In addition, for me its a matter of sustainability to use things as long
> as they work.
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
I have a 12 year old Acer AO Happy netbook (on Intel Atom CPU) which I'm
running under LinuxMint. If I plan to do non CPU consuming work on the way
to my office in subway trains and buses I still prefer it against a
ThinkPad X240 because of weight, size and ergonomics. It still runs longer
On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 4:54:19 PM UTC+1 William Stein wrote:
> I'm curious -- what is the situation is with Sage and 32-bit Linux?
>
The Sage buildbot has 32-bit Debian 9, 10, 11 and it works. But using a
recent (64-bit capable) CPU.
--
You received this message because you are
On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 11:19:44 AM UTC-8 Thierry
(sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote:
> What seems clear to me is that [...] most
> upstream projects seem not test fo 32bit architecture anymore.
>
Indeed many upstream projects have insufficient portability coverage even
if they already use
Hi
I was interested in African universities and supporting 32 bit until about
2-3 years ago.
It is less than 1% of (science) students' laptops now, in my experience.
And all institutional machines are 64bit.
Regards,
Jan
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 21:19, Thierry
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 08:37:52AM -0800, William Stein wrote:
[...]
>
>
> Amazing. Does anybody reading this use 32-bit Linux?
Not using on a daily basis, but in in october 2021, i built a Sage
Debian Live 32 bit because Nicolas was going to teach Sage in Burkina
Faso (and i was teaching
On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 8:32:47 AM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 7:54:19 AM UTC-8 wst...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Who will solve ticket #32768 -- https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32768
>>
>> "centos-7-i386: SIGFPE while building dochtml"
>
> with no other
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022, 15:25 John Cremona, wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 13:53, Samuel Lelievre
> wrote:
> >
> > 2022-01-18 10:54:34 UTC, John Cremona:
> > >
> > > I see that there are now over 2^32 trac tickets.
> >
> > The power of two that is near 32000 is really 2^15.
> > : )
>
> You are
By the way, 32-bit arm (still the standard for Raspberry Pi) is a bit
broken, something goes funny with weak references.
See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28941
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 4:55 PM William Stein wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 8:46 AM Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> >
> > On Tue,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 8:46 AM Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 07:53 -0800, William Stein wrote:
> >
> > One of the difficulties for them is lack of support for 32-bit Linux
> > distros. E.g., if you click
> >
>
> Nobody has the hardware any more. Debian is your best bet for
On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 07:53 -0800, William Stein wrote:
>
> One of the difficulties for them is lack of support for 32-bit Linux
> distros. E.g., if you click
>
Nobody has the hardware any more. Debian is your best bet for ongoing
i686 support.
--
You received this message because you are
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 8:32 AM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 7:54:19 AM UTC-8 wst...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Who will solve ticket #32768 -- https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32768
>>
>> "centos-7-i386: SIGFPE while building dochtml"
>
> with no other information at all.
On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 7:54:19 AM UTC-8 wst...@gmail.com wrote:
> Who will solve ticket #32768 -- https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32768
>
> "centos-7-i386: SIGFPE while building dochtml"
with no other information at all.
You can reproduce this failure by typing "tox -e
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 7:25 AM John Cremona wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 13:53, Samuel Lelievre
> wrote:
> >
> > 2022-01-18 10:54:34 UTC, John Cremona:
> > >
> > > I see that there are now over 2^32 trac tickets.
> >
> > The power of two that is near 32000 is really 2^15.
> > : )
>
> You
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 13:53, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> 2022-01-18 10:54:34 UTC, John Cremona:
> >
> > I see that there are now over 2^32 trac tickets.
>
> The power of two that is near 32000 is really 2^15.
> : )
You are right of course. We had 16-bit arithmetic so the max was
32767 (and min
16 matches
Mail list logo
