On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:32 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Apr 2, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Thanks.
I put a comment up on trac, but it boils down to
sage: f = (x == 1)
sage: g = (1 == x)
sage: bool(f+g)
True
sage: ff =
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Apr 2, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Thanks.
I put a comment up on trac, but it boils down to
sage: f = (x == 1)
sage: g = (1 == x)
sage: bool(f+g)
True
sage: ff = f._fast_float_('x') + g._fast_float_('x')
sage: ff(0)
0.0
On Apr 2, 2008, at 11:46 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Apr 2, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Thanks.
I put a comment up on trac, but it boils down to
sage: f = (x == 1)
sage: g = (1 == x)
sage: bool(f+g)
True
sage: ff =
Hi all,
I just downloaded the last stable 2.11 package to my 64-bit Arch Linux
box and tried to run ./sage. The resulting log is as follows:
$ ./sage
--
| SAGE Version 2.11, Release Date: 2008-03-30|
|
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently, depending on the matrix type, there are several different
ways to get eigenvalues and eigenvectors and it is hard to remember
which function goes with which type.
How about we unify the interface?
Currently, depending on the matrix type, there are several different
ways to get eigenvalues and eigenvectors and it is hard to remember
which function goes with which type.
How about we unify the interface?
Proposal:
eigenspaces: Return a list of tuples, the first element being an
One feature that would be really nice is to have distinct text cells,
in html or even better latex mode. A text cell could created by a hot key
(say
cntrl-t) in edit mode which displays the source latex or html, then toggled
out
of edit mode to display the formatted text. This could be
Hi! I want to hear your opinions about a little problem.
The following bug is already reported as #2232:
1.digits(16,'0123456789abcdef') returns ['1']
but 0.digits(16,'0123456789abcdef') returns [] (and not ['0']
as i wish)
So i started looking at the code to fix this little problem.
But it
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
How about Ctrl+s split at the current line and Ctrl+m merge with the
previous one? (Or next one, I am not sure which one is more natural.)
I'd go for the next one.
Seems more intuitive, but I have a warped sense of humour
Surely ctrl+m
On Apr 3, 2008, at 10:05 AM, Joel B. Mohler wrote:
I intentionally made 0.digits() return [] because that seems to me
the most
consistent mathematical thing to do.
+1
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
On Apr 3, 2008, at 03:38 , Jason Grout wrote:
Currently, depending on the matrix type, there are several different
ways to get eigenvalues and eigenvectors and it is hard to remember
which function goes with which type.
How about we unify the interface?
Proposal:
eigenspaces: Return a
Hello folks,
it has been a while since Bug Day 10. We also had two Doc Days and two
Sage Days since then, so that somewhat explains while there has been
relatively activity in this direction. But before anybody can announce
another Doc Day I would suggest doing Bug Day 11 on April 5th. The
usual
On Thursday 03 April 2008 10:37, Alex Ghitza wrote:
Note that at the moment 0.digits() does (2) and 0.ndigits() does (1),
which is really bad.
Yes, this is very bad. I was not aware of the ndigits convention until after
the digits patch I wrote was included. On this topic, we also need a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William Stein wrote:
| On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| On Apr 3, 2008, at 03:38 , Jason Grout wrote:
|
| Currently, depending on the matrix type, there are several different
| ways to get
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 3, 2008, at 03:38 , Jason Grout wrote:
Currently, depending on the matrix type, there are several different
ways to get eigenvalues and eigenvectors and it is hard to remember
which function goes with
On Apr 3, 2008, at 07:52 , Alex Ghitza wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William Stein wrote:
| On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
|
| On Apr 3, 2008, at 03:38 , Jason Grout wrote:
[snip]
| I don't see the need, and I'm
I've played with this some -- ctrl-s is frequently the shortcut to save -- in
most browsers, to save the current webpage do disk.
What do people think of ctrl-enter to split, and ctrl-backspace to join with
previous?
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, bill purvis wrote:
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Andrey
What about including the eigenvalue multiplicities as well?
John
On 03/04/2008, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 3, 2008, at 07:52 , Alex Ghitza wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William Stein wrote:
| On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:27 AM,
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Gary Furnish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe. I see two real issues.
1) Sage right now has really bad global namespace pollution issues that make
it very hard to import just one or two files. I don't see why this
shouldn't be fixable, it just needs
On Apr 3, 7:37 am, Alex Ghitza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess this is a question of convention, and depends on how you think
of digit:
(1) a digit is a symbol used to construct representations of numbers,
and so the base 10 digits are: 0, 1, ..., 9. In this case,
0.ndigits() should
I don't see the need, and I'm always leery of overpopulating the
namespace :-} You already have the functionality, and with '?', it is
easily accessible.
I don't always support synonyms but I do want all those little helper
functions. The point is to make it easy to read code --
On Apr 3, 2008, at 3:38 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
Currently, depending on the matrix type, there are several different
ways to get eigenvalues and eigenvectors and it is hard to remember
which function goes with which type.
How about we unify the interface?
+1 This has bothered me too.
I saw the example that used Expect to invoke Sage from an external
program.
Is Expect necessary from Python scripts too?
Can I just import some sage modules and then call some functions from
Python?
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email
You have to use the Python install included with Sage which has
everything you need.
So write your script and then do sage -python blah.py
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw the example that used Expect to invoke Sage from an external
program.
The patch at #2653 whias was merged for 2.11 was supposed to fix this:
{{{
sage: k.a = GF(5^5)
sage: E = EllipticCurve(k,[2,4])
sage: M = E.cardinality(); M
3227
sage: type(M)
type 'sage.rings.rational.Rational'
}}}
I'm sure I can fix this, but should I reopen that ticket or open a new one?
We have to regard 0 as a special case, I don't think there's any point
in pretending otherwise. If all leading zeros were stripped off in
all cases then the string representing 0 would be the empty string,
and obviously that would be silly.
I went to see what the degree of the 0 polynomial is
I'm fine with these, but actually any fast way will work for me.
On Apr 3, 9:17 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do people think of ctrl-enter to split, and ctrl-backspace to join with
previous?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
On Thursday 03 April 2008 15:14, John Cremona wrote:
We have to regard 0 as a special case, I don't think there's any point
in pretending otherwise. If all leading zeros were stripped off in
all cases then the string representing 0 would be the empty string,
and obviously that would be
On Apr 3, 11:39 am, Timothy Clemans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So write your script and then do sage -python blah.py
Timothy
Thanks. My specific python script is a full blown python web app/
server that I want to invoke Sage on behalf of various brower
clients.
By doing your idea...sage
On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 3, 11:39 am, Timothy Clemans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So write your script and then do sage -python blah.py
Timothy
Thanks. My specific python script is a full blown python web app/
server that I want to invoke Sage on behalf
That seem reasonable to me. If users expected the number of digits to
always equal the length of the string representation, then what about
negative integers?
Of course we could restrict the ndigits() function to positive integers only...
John
On 03/04/2008, Joel B. Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 3, 9:20 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch at #2653 whias was merged for 2.11 was supposed to fix this:
{{{
sage: k.a = GF(5^5)
sage: E = EllipticCurve(k,[2,4])
sage: M = E.cardinality(); M
3227
sage: type(M)
type 'sage.rings.rational.Rational'
}}}
I'm sure
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:14 PM, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have to regard 0 as a special case, I don't think there's any point
in pretending otherwise. If all leading zeros were stripped off in
all cases then the string representing 0 would be the empty string,
and
OK, fine. In any case the fix was to make some changes to
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_finite_field.py in code I wrote (and
I have added some doctests to match) rather than in the quadratic
order code which was fixed in #2653.
John
On 03/04/2008, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Fine -- clearly a sensible choice at the time, and I would not dream
of changing that now!
John
On 03/04/2008, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:14 PM, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have to regard 0 as a special case, I don't think there's any
On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
I don't see the need, and I'm always leery of overpopulating the
namespace :-} You already have the functionality, and with '?',
it is
easily accessible.
I don't always support synonyms but I do want all those little helper
functions.
Hi,
I'm just starting to write a book on Sage for an undergrad course.
It's supposed
to have a narrative and personal feel, much more so than the
tutorial or other
books. I guess it's a little like Sage for newbies except (1) aimed at senior
undergrads with a programming background, and (2)
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:24 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm just starting to write a book on Sage for an undergrad course.
It's supposed
to have a narrative and personal feel, much more so than the
tutorial or other
books. I guess it's a little like Sage for
38 matches
Mail list logo
