Hello,
I would like to know if there exists a factory or something to build
automatically set, sequence or multi set of combinatorial classes.
If I am not clear, we have *rooted trees* then it seems natural to have
*forest of rooted trees* (may be there exists and I am interested)... so we
ps: I know Florent has made a *SetFactory* but it is not what I ask.
(I think to something like *sage: Seq(Permutations())*.)
Le samedi 11 mai 2013 09:04:55 UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Priez a écrit :
Hello,
I would like to know if there exists a factory or something to build
automatically set,
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:04:55AM -0700, Jean-Baptiste Priez wrote:
More generally, there exists a factory which creates a combinatorial
classe from a grammar?
That's precisely what species are about. I am not sure whether the
current implementation supports
Hi arojas,
Which PKGBUILD did you use? Where I search on the arch repo, I only see
SAGE-5.8 (in community) and SAGE-5.10-devel in AUR.
Where I downloaded the source (SAGE-5.9) and fellowed your suggestion by
setting CPP to /usr/bin/cpp, I got the exact same error: bits/c++config.h:
No such
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 10:17:52 AM UTC+2, Pong wrote:
Hi arojas,
Which PKGBUILD did you use? Where I search on the arch repo, I only
see SAGE-5.8 (in community) and SAGE-5.10-devel in AUR.
Where I downloaded the source (SAGE-5.9) and fellowed your suggestion by
setting CPP to
The one in community is 5.8 (not 5.9) and isn't it a binary package?
I'm looking at the one from AUR which is 5.10 beta.
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 1:24:26 AM UTC-7, arojas wrote:
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 10:17:52 AM UTC+2, Pong wrote:
Hi arojas,
Which PKGBUILD did you use? Where I
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 10:33:01 AM UTC+2, Pong wrote:
The one in community is 5.8 (not 5.9) and isn't it a binary package?
I'm looking at the one from AUR which is 5.10 beta.
Binary packages also have PKGBUILDs. You can download them, modify them as
you need and recompile. Check the
I repeatedly run into problems where Sage claims it's not able to
evaluate a function. Often, this happens due to a
ValueError: negative number cannot be raised to a fractional power
which bubbles up from somewhere deep in the call stack. Here is one of
those cases
summand = summand*( m*( y_i-(
I've build a sage 5.9 binary thing on a Solaris 10/sparc (SUNW,T5140, so
ultrasparc t2 i guess) by exporting SAGE_FAT_BINARIES=yes and ./sage
--bdist 5.9 (is it the right procedure?) and the result can be found at:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jpflori/sage-5.9-sun4v-SunOS.tar.gz
If
Alright, I see. Thanks. I only didn't know that. I thought PKGBUILDs are
available only to those in AUR, since they ask you explicitly whether you
want to edit them during installation.
We are getting somewhere since I compiles through Singular. However, it
then failed at the
Another wierd thing is that, it produces a pkg/ directory with a strange
premission setting.
d- 2 pong users 4096 May 11 09:05 pkg/
I tried to set it to 755 and it is set to that again when I issue makepkg -i
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 2:16:03 AM UTC-7, arojas wrote:
On
Just change the DOT_SAGE line to point to some dir where you have write
permissions, eg /tmp. Sorry, I forgot to warn you about that, but if you still
have the build dir around makepkg won't need to rebuild everything again
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I confirm this behavior on a fresh install of version 5.9 from the sources:
sage -clone triggers the recompilation of the Cython sources. In version
5.8, it did not. Don't know the reason for this...
Eric.
Le vendredi 10 mai 2013 14:53:27 UTC+2, vdelecroix a écrit :
Hi,
It seems that the
Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
I confirm this behavior on a fresh install of version 5.9 from the
sources: sage -clone triggers the recompilation of the Cython sources.
In version 5.8, it did not. Don't know the reason for this...
FWIW, it did still work in 5.9.beta2.
Probably #13031 [1] (merged
Thanks. I do still have the prebuild and it passes through the build.
But now it hangs at
Creating sage-5.9-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz ...
Moving final distribution file to
/home/pong/sage-mathematics/src/sage-5.9/dist
== Entering fakeroot environment...
== Starting package()...
== Tidying install...
Hey Volker,
I'll make sure there are either no conflicts or set the dependency.
Best,
Travis
On Friday, May 10, 2013 1:54:19 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote:
I'd be grateful if any changes to matrix groups would be on top of the
libgap-matrix-group patches at #14014
On Friday, May 10,
leif wrote:
Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
I confirm this behavior on a fresh install of version 5.9 from the
sources: sage -clone triggers the recompilation of the Cython sources.
In version 5.8, it did not. Don't know the reason for this...
FWIW, it did still work in 5.9.beta2.
Probably #13031
Hi,
it was reported in
http://ask.sagemath.org/question/2567/kill-the-thread-in-a-long-computation
that cython seems not to handle Python signals correctly. It-it a
feature or should-it be reported ?
Ciao,
Thierry
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Thank you all for helping along the way. I got SAGE-5.9 installed finally.
It was just a long wait at the stripping unneeded symbols from binaries and
libraries...
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 11:06:30 AM UTC-7, Pong wrote:
Thanks. I do still have the prebuild and it passes through the build.
On May 11, 2:15 pm, Thierry sage-googlesu...@lma.metelu.net wrote:
Hi,
it was reported
inhttp://ask.sagemath.org/question/2567/kill-the-thread-in-a-long-compu...
that cython seems not to handle Python signals correctly. It-it a
feature or should-it be reported ?
I think it's a feature.
I see what you mean, and you might be right in this case. But anyways
i keep my proposal: do you think that having an algorithm=parallel
option for the cases where an optimal tuning heuristic is not
possible? I can think on several situations where, even with a good
tuning, you can find exceptions
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca wrote:
On May 11, 2:15 pm, Thierry sage-googlesu...@lma.metelu.net wrote:
Hi,
it was reported
inhttp://ask.sagemath.org/question/2567/kill-the-thread-in-a-long-compu...
that cython seems not to handle Python signals correctly. It-it
William Stein wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca wrote:
On May 11, 2:15 pm, Thierry sage-googlesu...@lma.metelu.net wrote:
Hi,
it was reported
inhttp://ask.sagemath.org/question/2567/kill-the-thread-in-a-long-compu...
that cython seems not to handle Python
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:05 PM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca wrote:
On May 11, 2:15 pm, Thierry sage-googlesu...@lma.metelu.net wrote:
Hi,
it was reported
24 matches
Mail list logo
