Re: [sage-devel] Re: [Yet again] Sage's R vs system's R

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:54 PM, leif wrote: > kcrisman wrote: >> >> Make R optional? (Nothing in Sage depends on it, except for the >> interface to it, including Rpy2.) >> >> Gosh, R has been standard for*ever*, practically, > > Hört sich nach Schwäbischem

[sage-devel] Re: (William Stein) "my top priority right now is to **make a lot of money**"

Nathan does give the link to the original post, but he is quoting out of context. Here is the full post: On Sunday, 21 August 2016 07:15:56 UTC+10, William wrote: > So there is no confusion, my top priority right now is to **make a lot > of money** by building a profitable company on open

[sage-devel] mailing list administration

Hello, The mail of Nathann posted on 24 Aug. 2016 [1], [2] cross posted on sage-support and sage-devel did not reach sage-devel. My answer to him did not reach sage-devel either. It was clearly not spam. Possibly considered as flame (but the thread was not moved to sage-flame). I would be

Re: [sage-devel] mailing list administration

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > The mail of Nathann posted on 24 Aug. 2016 [1], [2] cross posted on > sage-support and sage-devel did not reach sage-devel. My answer to him did > not reach sage-devel either. > > It was clearly not

Re: [sage-devel] mailing list administration

The mails seems to have been correctly sent out to subscribers (of sage-devel). At least a few of us here at SD75 got it. I can't explain why it's not showing up on the google groups web site. Best, Johan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel"

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [Yet again] Sage's R vs system's R

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Erik Bray wrote: > I think almost any dependency that Sage-the-Python-package can work > without should be considered "optional" insofar as installing Sage is > concerned. I think it's fine for it to be a stadard part of >

[sage-devel] Re: [Yet again] Sage's R vs system's R

William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Erik Bray wrote: >> I think almost any dependency that Sage-the-Python-package can work >> without should be considered "optional" insofar as installing Sage is >> concerned. I think it's fine for it to be a stadard

[sage-devel] Re: [Yet again] Sage's R vs system's R

On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 4:54:45 PM UTC-4, leif wrote: > > kcrisman wrote: > > > > Make R optional? (Nothing in Sage depends on it, except for the > > interface to it, including Rpy2.) > > > > Gosh, R has been standard for*ever*, practically, > > Hört sich nach Schwäbischem

[sage-devel] (William Stein) "my top priority right now is to **make a lot of money**"

Quote from William Stein, CEO of SageMath Inc (private for-profit Delaware company) [1] So there is no confusion, my top priority right now is to **make a lot of money** by building a profitable company on open source software (Latex, Linux, Sage, Octave, R, etc.) (full post)

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] (William Stein) "my top priority right now is to **make a lot of money**"

Hi Nathann, But you are responsible for hiding the rest of the message... - William's strategy is: making money with SageMath Inc and use this money to continue (i.e. after having started Sage) building an open source ecosystem for mathematical computations. - Not every Sage developer

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] (William Stein) "my top priority right now is to **make a lot of money**"

Hello, But you are responsible for hiding the rest of the message... > With a link toward the full message follows the quote ? You claim that I hid it is rather bold. - William's strategy is: making money with SageMath Inc and use this > money to continue (i.e. after having started Sage)