[sage-devel] trouble compiling singular

[I tried to post already yesterday, but my message somehow didn't get through] When trying to build sage (the current develop-branch 7.5) I get an error on my debian box with a current sid-install. For the end of the logfile, see the end of this post. It also throws some of the following

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] combinat.sagemath.org

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Matthew Rennekamp wrote: > I'm working on the www.sagemath.org & SageWiki. What happened to > combinat.sagemath.org? Are there other places those files are stored? The machine exists, and I have a backup copy of all files. As with

[sage-devel] Error when attaching file, NameError: name 'cython' is not defined

I am trying to attach a code file to a sage notebook. The call is : attach ("~/.sage/MHF_Bloch_n_Plot.sage"). The error I get is "NameError: name 'cython' is not defined". The code in the attach file is: ... cython(""" #Parallel Cython, Numpy calls -- 3 part3 #Part 1 #Cython version for

[sage-combinat-devel] combinat.sagemath.org

I'm working on the www.sagemath.org & SageWiki. What happened to combinat.sagemath.org? Are there other places those files are stored? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

[sage-devel] Re: maxima_calculus.load("blah.mac") throws, load("blah.mac'") in sage --maxima works

On 2017-01-12, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > maxima_calculus.load("blah.mac") throws a TypeError: > ECL says: THROW: The catch MACSYMA-QUIT is undefined. Well, there is more than one way to process an input file in Maxima, and in one of those ways, the function reading the file

[sage-devel] Re: Release note auto-generation RFC

On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 8:10:54 PM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 6:01:55 PM UTC, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> The whole point of NEWS would be to have coarser granularity than >> individual tickets. E.g. 7.4 -> 7.5 is over 300 tickets, and a

[sage-devel] maxima_calculus.load("blah.mac") throws, load("blah.mac'") in sage --maxima works

I am trying to understand how to load Maxima user code into maxima_calculus(). Running maxima_calculus.load("blah.mac") throws a TypeError: ECL says: THROW: The catch MACSYMA-QUIT is undefined. maxima.load("blah.mac") just hangs indefinitely. Trying the same code in sage --maxima, there

[sage-devel] Re: maxima_calculus.load("blah.mac") throws, load("blah.mac'") in sage --maxima works

This works: sage: maxima_calculus.load('to_poly_solve') \"/usr/local/sage/sage-git/local/share/maxima/5.35.1/share/to_poly_solve/to_poly_solve.mac\" whereas this does not: sage: maxima_calculus.load('to_poly_solve.mac') TypeError: ECL says: In function PATHNAME, the value of the only argument

[sage-devel] Re: Release note auto-generation RFC

If you want the name "Sage" (vs. "sage") it must be under src/Sage like in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22176 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] Release note auto-generation RFC

Hi, On 12/01/2017 00:09, Volker Braun wrote: There is a somewhat painless approach to generating human-readable release notes using https://github.com/hawkowl/towncrier. As far as the ticket author is concerned, if you think that your ticket #12435 is of wider interest and should be announced

Re: [sage-devel] Sage runs in Window's 10's new Unix subsystem

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:43 AM, GK wrote: > >> >> I am not having any problem starting the notebook. You might genuinely be >> out of memory, or hard drive space. >> > > I am not having trouble starting the notebook either, but I can not do > anything with it, also, no, I am

Re: [sage-devel] Sage runs in Window's 10's new Unix subsystem

> > I am not having any problem starting the notebook. You might genuinely be > out of memory, or hard drive space. > > I am not having trouble starting the notebook either, but I can not do anything with it, also, no, I am not running out of memory nor hard disk space. I have increased the

Re: [sage-devel] Release note auto-generation RFC

On 12/01/17 10:41, 'Julien Puydt' via sage-devel wrote: I have to point out that this isn't auto-generated since a specific command has to be entered. I also notice that towncrier has pretty rough single-level structuring (feature, bugfix, doc, removal, misc), which might be a bit limitative

[sage-devel] Re: trouble compiling singular

I figured out what the problem was: I had a version of polymake installed (3.0.6) and singular checks for a polymake install. However when I removed polymake and polymake-config from /usr/local/bin sage could be build successfully. When configuring singular one could also pass the

[sage-devel] trouble compiling on debian sid

When trying to build sage from source on my debian box with a current sid install, I get the following error: [singular-4.1.0p1] ../../../gfanlib/gfanlib_matrix.h:221:24: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare] [singular-4.1.0p1] Makefile:573: recipe

[sage-devel] A triangulate method that produces quadrilaterals. Why ?

While investigating the stl export from 3D plots, (which have been recently improved, see trac-ticket-22144 ) I found a method in plot/plot3d/parametric_surface.pyx

Re: [sage-devel] Release note auto-generation RFC

> > Wouldn't some directive like "If you think ticket #314159 is of wider > interest, all you have to do is to fill in the Changes-7.6.rst file" > make it possible to both drop this new tool and allow a richer > structure? Said Changes-.rst could start as a copy from a > Changes-template.rst

Re: [sage-devel] Release note auto-generation RFC

On 12/01/2017 09:54, Kwankyu Lee wrote: Wouldn't some directive like "If you think ticket #314159 is of wider interest, all you have to do is to fill in the Changes-7.6.rst file" make it possible to both drop this new tool and allow a richer structure? Said Changes-.rst could

[sage-combinat-devel] Fomin's growth diagrams

In https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21594 there is a implementation of Fomin's growth diagrams for dual graded graphs in quite some generality. For illustration, I implemented RSK and its variants, Domino insertion, the Binary Word growth, the Sylvester graph, Young Fibonacci. I took some

[sage-devel] Re: Release note auto-generation RFC

On 2017-01-12, Volker Braun wrote: > Yes, to the Sage src tree. That is, we would add a newsfragments directory > somewhere under $SAGE_ROOT. Seriously??? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe

[sage-devel] Re: Release note auto-generation RFC

On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 1:48:28 PM UTC+1, Simon King wrote: > > On 2017-01-12, Volker Braun wrote: > > Yes, to the Sage src tree. That is, we would add a newsfragments > directory > > somewhere under $SAGE_ROOT. > > Seriously??? > How else would the ticket

[sage-devel] Re: trouble compiling singular

Thanks for the report. Sage has an experimental polymake package: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20892 Not sure if we ever checked how well it lives together with Singular --- but we should. On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 10:53:19 AM UTC, moritz wrote: > > I figured out what the problem

Re: [sage-devel] Release note auto-generation RFC

Volker Braun writes: > There is a somewhat painless approach to generating human-readable release > notes using https://github.com/hawkowl/towncrier. As far as the ticket > author is concerned, if you think that your ticket #12435 is of wider > interest and should be announced then all you'd

[sage-devel] Re: Release note auto-generation RFC

Wouldn't it be better to relate news to closed/merged trac tickets? This might need an extra trac feature allowing for tagging tickets for priority in the sense of how much value a ticket adds. (critical/blocker/major hierarchy is something different) Then NEWS would come from harvesting

[sage-devel] Re: Release note auto-generation RFC

The whole point of NEWS would be to have coarser granularity than individual tickets. E.g. 7.4 -> 7.5 is over 300 tickets, and a 300-item list is never a good answer to the question "whats new in this release". I would envision a list of, say, 10-20 highlights to have associated news

[sage-devel] Re: A triangulate method that produces quadrilaterals. Why ?

Hello, I think this is more subtle than that. The procedure "triangulate" is used in several places, and sometimes it may generate triangles. When I wrote the old stl_ascii_string, I was lazy and did not care about faces other than triangles, even if I knew perfectly that they could happen. I

Re: [sage-devel] trouble compiling on debian sid

I haven't looked at the details, but I would guess that singular's polymake interface is out of date / untested (our polymake package is up to date). A ticket should be created and upstream singular be notified. Matthias On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 11:00:36 AM UTC-8, François wrote: > > I

Re: [sage-devel] trouble compiling on debian sid

Would you happen to have polymake installed system wide? Francois On 13/01/2017, at 12:29 AM, moritz > wrote: When trying to build sage from source on my debian box with a current sid install, I get the following error:

Re: [sage-devel] trouble compiling on debian sid

I now see that was indeed the problem. No easy to solve it sage side without dropping the experimental polymake package or never building the singular interface to it. Considering version problems between singular and polymake, the later would be my inclination. Francois On 13/01/2017, at

[sage-devel] Re: Release note auto-generation RFC

One could perhaps use metatickets on trac for that. On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 10:01:55 AM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote: > > The whole point of NEWS would be to have coarser granularity than > individual tickets. E.g. 7.4 -> 7.5 is over 300 tickets, and a 300-item > list is never a good

[sage-devel] Re: Release note auto-generation RFC

On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 6:01:55 PM UTC, Volker Braun wrote: > > The whole point of NEWS would be to have coarser granularity than > individual tickets. E.g. 7.4 -> 7.5 is over 300 tickets, and a 300-item > list is never a good answer to the question "whats new in this release". I >

[sage-devel] Re: A triangulate method that produces quadrilaterals. Why ?

Hi. Thank you for the explanation. You can add me to the list of people telling : export to stl is definitely good to have! A On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 7:25:50 PM UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > > Hello, > > I think this is more subtle than that. The procedure "triangulate" is used >