[sage-devel] Re: RR, coercion of numpy.float32() and clang - coercion experts needed

Dima Pasechnik wrote: > but it looks as if it might be a coercion problem. > Any ideas where to look? Not really, but it does look like the common parent discovered by the coercion system is incorrect: sage: import numpy as np sage: a = np.float('1.5') sage: b = np.float32('1.5') sage:

[sage-devel] Re: RR, coercion of numpy.float32() and clang - coercion experts needed

On Friday, April 21, 2017 at 9:11:37 AM UTC+1, Marc Mezzarobba wrote: > > Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > but it looks as if it might be a coercion problem. > > Any ideas where to look? > > Not really, but it does look like the common parent > discovered by the coercion system is incorrect: > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac slow

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Thursday, April 20, 2017 at 4:04:19 PM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Thursday, April 20, 2017 at 3:38:12 PM UTC+1, Erik

Re: [sage-devel] How about moving the AUTHORS section to the last?

On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Kwankyu Lee wrote: I propose to move the AUTHORS section to the last of the heading: +1. -- Jori Mäntysalo

[sage-devel] Re: How about moving the AUTHORS section to the last?

On 2017-04-21, Jori Mantysalo wrote: > On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > >> I propose to move the AUTHORS section to the last of the heading: > > +1. Question: Do you suggest to *manually* move the AUTHORS: section of *all* affected docstrings? Or do you merely

Re: [sage-devel] Re: How about moving the AUTHORS section to the last?

> > > Question: Do you suggest to *manually* move the AUTHORS: section of > > *all* affected docstrings? Or do you merely suggest to modify Sage's > > doc builder I merely suggest the official location of the AUTHORS section, as done in the ticket. > Having more structured docstring would

Re: [sage-devel] Re: How about moving the AUTHORS section to the last?

On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Simon King wrote: On 2017-04-21, Jori Mantysalo wrote: On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Kwankyu Lee wrote: I propose to move the AUTHORS section to the last of the heading: +1. Question: Do you suggest to *manually* move the AUTHORS: section of *all*

[sage-devel] Sage on Cygwin status update

Hi all, I'd like to report a positive status of the Cygwin port of Sage. As of this week, I *finally* have a custom branch based on top of Sage's develop branch building successfully on Cygwin again, with all tests passing (excluding any optional packages). This was previously the case for Sage

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on Cygwin status update

Good job! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: RR, coercion of numpy.float32() and clang - coercion experts needed

Quick guess (don't have time to look at this soon): the issue could be in the action discovery code, which may try creating elements of numpy.float32 using weird inputs. This could cause a difference between right and left multiplication. One way to check if this is the source is to try converting

[sage-devel] can't upload slides of SageDays86 on the wiki

Bonjour to all, I am currently at https://wiki.sagemath.org/days86 where we had great presentations during the week by James Mitchell (GAP libsemigroup), Jennifer Balakrishnan (Three problems in number theory), François Bergeron (experimental mathematics) and Thierry Monteil (gems of

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on Cygwin status update

That's great to hear. What about the latest version of R? This is where I'm currently stuck on my Cygwin64 build. Best, Travis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

Re: [sage-devel] can't upload slides of SageDays86 on the wiki

Hi, i am not admin on the wiki, but setting client_max_body_size variable to a larger number (or 0 for infinity) should fix the issue. Ciao, Thierry On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 08:16:10AM -0700, Sébastien Labbé wrote: > Bonjour to all, > > I am currently at https://wiki.sagemath.org/days86 where

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Cygwin status update

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > That's great to hear. > > What about the latest version of R? This is where I'm currently stuck on my > Cygwin64 build. What about it? It works for me... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: RR, coercion of numpy.float32() and clang - coercion experts needed

On Friday, April 21, 2017 at 3:46:03 PM UTC+1, David Roe wrote: > > Quick guess (don't have time to look at this soon): the issue could be in > the action discovery code, which may try creating elements of numpy.float32 > using weird inputs. This could cause a difference between right and left

Re: [sage-devel] SageNB -> Jupyter conversion needs testers

> Let me remind that there are various tickets regarding the > SageNB->Jupyter conversion which need review: > > #22668: HTML widget without description > #22654: Implement %%fortran in Jupyter > #22636: Make the Sage interact library work in Jupyter > > And please anyone who can test the

[sage-devel] Re: can't upload slides of SageDays86 on the wiki

> I am currently at https://wiki.sagemath.org/days86 where we had great > presentations during the week by James Mitchell (GAP libsemigroup), > Jennifer Balakrishnan (Three problems in number theory), François Bergeron > (experimental mathematics) and Thierry Monteil (gems of

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Cygwin status update

Ah, I missed https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22761. Best, Travis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Cygwin status update

Great! I am in favor of having cygwin as another main goal for 8.0. On 21/04/2017 14:45, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: Good job! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Cygwin status update

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > Ah, I missed https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22761. Looks like I didn't include that one in the "Porting: Cygwin" category since it also has a few non-Cygwin-specific changes--oops -- You received this message

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Cygwin status update

I also used atlas as my blas, using gcc 6.3, did it in parallel, and did not build the docs. Best, Travis On Friday, April 21, 2017 at 8:03:32 PM UTC-5, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > I was able to build and run Sage with the positively reviewed Cygwin > tickets plus: > > >-

Re: [sage-devel] Re: RR, coercion of numpy.float32() and clang - coercion experts needed

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Friday, April 21, 2017 at 3:46:03 PM UTC+1, David Roe wrote: >> >> Quick guess (don't have time to look at this soon): the issue could be in >> the action discovery code, which may try creating elements of

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Cygwin status update

Okay, I can't get it to run tests: $ ./sage -t src/sage no stored timings available Running doctests with ID 2017-04-22-01-14-29-566bb225. 0 [main] python2.7 5280 child_info_fork::abort: unable to map C:\ cygwin64\home\Travis\sage\local\lib\python2.7\site-packages\psutil\

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Cygwin status update

More updates, I've been able to install and use most of the packages that I normally would except: - libhomfly won't compile its corresponding pyx file: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22856 - gap3 installed fine but won't run (but this is currently an experimental package, so slightly less

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on Cygwin status update

I was able to build and run Sage with the positively reviewed Cygwin tickets plus: - https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21459 - https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21399 (I'm not sure if this was necessary) - https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22628 -