Re: [sage-devel] sage foundation ???

2018-09-24 Thread kcrisman
On Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 1:18:50 AM UTC-4, rjf wrote: > > I assume that other research universities work about the same as at UC > Berkeley. Anyone can donate money to a professor's research activities > with a designation something like "to support Prof X's research in the > area of

Re: [sage-devel] Can't pull from develop branch.

2018-09-24 Thread Erik Bray
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 10:30 PM Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > Le samedi 22 septembre 2018 22:19:32 UTC+2, Erik Bray a écrit : >> >> Try >> >> $ git branch -d origin/u/embray/python3/sage-rings-polynomial-polydict > > > No such luck : > > charpent@asus16-ec:/usr/local/sage-8$ git branch -d >

[sage-devel] Re: Corrupt system

2018-09-24 Thread Bruce Westbury
I did "git checkout master" and then "make build". It has just finished building (so the better part of a day!) and left me on sage 8.2 I assume that it would have been quicker to have used "git checkout 8.4.beta4" (with the period, thanks Travis) On Sunday, 23 September 2018 14:05:58 UTC+1,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Deprecate and remove/relocate explain_pickle module?

2018-09-24 Thread Erik Bray
Ok, thanks for the feedback. This isn't a high priority right now, but it was just one my mind at the moment so I wanted to put the idea out there. I'll plan to split it out to a stand-alone package when I get there (probably it will be one of the last things to do before we can claim full

Re: [sage-devel] sage foundation ???

2018-09-24 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:35 PM William Stein wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:12 AM, kcrisman wrote: > > > > > > On Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 1:18:50 AM UTC-4, rjf wrote: > >> > >> I assume that other research universities work about the same as at UC > >> Berkeley. Anyone can donate

Re: [sage-devel] sage foundation ???

2018-09-24 Thread Dima Pasechnik
I think joining NumFocus is a good idea. On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, 15:07 Erik Bray, wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:35 PM William Stein wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:12 AM, kcrisman wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 1:18:50 AM UTC-4, rjf wrote: > > >> > > >> I

Re: [sage-devel] sage foundation ???

2018-09-24 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > I think joining NumFocus is a good idea. +1 and it doesn't preclude people/companies still donating to something at UW if they want to... William > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, 15:07 Erik Bray, wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:35 PM

Re: [sage-devel] sage foundation ???

2018-09-24 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:40 PM William Stein wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I think joining NumFocus is a good idea. > > +1 and it doesn't preclude people/companies still donating to > something at UW if they want to... there are formal things needed

Re: [sage-devel] sage foundation ???

2018-09-24 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > 1, 3, 4 is there or very easy to set up. 5 should not be too hard either. > Perhaps the most tricky is 2 (or perhaps not anymore, after out > infamous CoC discussion fiasco we could agree it makes sense to get > something in place; we can

Re: [sage-devel] sage foundation ???

2018-09-24 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:00 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:40 PM William Stein wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > I think joining NumFocus is a good idea. > > > > +1 and it doesn't preclude people/companies still donating to > >

Re: [sage-devel] sage foundation ???

2018-09-24 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:39 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 5:11 PM William Stein wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > > 1, 3, 4 is there or very easy to set up. 5 should not be too hard either. > > > Perhaps the most tricky is 2

Re: [sage-devel] sage foundation ???

2018-09-24 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 5:53 PM Erik Bray wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:39 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 5:11 PM William Stein wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > > > > 1, 3, 4 is there or very easy to set up. 5

Re: [sage-devel] sage foundation ???

2018-09-24 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:00 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:40 PM William Stein wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > I think joining NumFocus is a good idea. > > > > +1 and it doesn't preclude people/companies still donating to > >

Re: [sage-devel] sage foundation ???

2018-09-24 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 5:11 PM William Stein wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > 1, 3, 4 is there or very easy to set up. 5 should not be too hard either. > > Perhaps the most tricky is 2 (or perhaps not anymore, after out > > infamous CoC discussion fiasco

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Developer guide for casual user

2018-09-24 Thread Erik Bray
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 7:23 PM William Stein wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Simon King wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > > > On 2018-09-23, Andy Howell wrote: > >> I'd guess the word "tricks" was objectionable. What I meant was > >> techniques like locating the source using funcName? Now

Re: [sage-devel] sage foundation ???

2018-09-24 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Erik Bray wrote: > 5) also might be harder than you think--or at least, even if we can > come up with an uncontroversial list of names, it's a discussion that > invites questions about project governance. To make it easier, I would suggest that the three names