On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:04 PM Jakub Jabłoński wrote:
>
> Sorry, didn't notice it's not rebuilding. Done it now and issue with omp
> still occurs.
hmm. Somewhere something instists on using openmp.
Perhaps, do
make distclean
make
>
> On Friday, April 3, 2020 at 4:13:39 PM UTC+2, Dima
I have removed whole cygwin and reinstalled everything, now ecl is not
failing. However sage is still not building.
Building log ends with following text (can't upload logs as attachment,
don't know why)
[sagelib-9.1.beta9] collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
[sagelib-9.1.beta9] error:
I have removed whole cygwin and reinstalled everything, now ecl is not
failing. However sage is still not building.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
from this part of the log it is not possible to see much, except that
Sage's Python library has failed to build.
Please paste as many lines above these from the output as you can.
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, 15:09 Jakub Jabłoński, wrote:
> I have removed whole cygwin and reinstalled everything, now
you are building fflas-ffpack with OpenMP on, for some reason.
it should be possible to modify its spkg-install.in file so that it does
not happen, rebuild it, and sagelib itself.
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 16:40, Jakub Jabłoński wrote:
> Okay, uploaded only log which seems to be relevant (it's
I have added --disable-openmp here in spkg-install.in:
if [ "$SAGE_FAT_BINARY" = yes ]; then
FFLAS_FFPACK_CONFIGURE="--disable-openmp --disable-sse --disable-sse2
--disable-sse3 --disable-ssse3 --disable-sse41 --disable-sse42
--disable-fma --disable-fma4 --disable-avx --disable-avx2
it seems that your addition is conditional on SAGE_FAT_BINARY being set to
yes.
It should not be so.
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, 19:56 Jakub Jabłoński, wrote:
> I have added --disable-openmp here in spkg-install.in:
> if [ "$SAGE_FAT_BINARY" = yes ]; then
> FFLAS_FFPACK_CONFIGURE="--disable-openmp
could you post the top-level config.log ?
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 16:59, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> you are building fflas-ffpack with OpenMP on, for some reason.
> it should be possible to modify its spkg-install.in file so that it does
> not happen, rebuild it, and sagelib itself.
>
>
> On Fri, 3
have you rebuilt fflas-ffpack after your addition of flags?
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:00 PM Jakub Jabłoński wrote:
>
> Current version:
>
> # If SAGE_FAT_BINARY is set, disable all processor-specific optimizations
> if [ "$SAGE_FAT_BINARY" = yes ]; then
>
Sorry, didn't notice it's not rebuilding. Done it now and issue with omp
still occurs.
On Friday, April 3, 2020 at 4:13:39 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> have you rebuilt fflas-ffpack after your addition of flags?
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:00 PM Jakub Jabłoński > wrote:
> >
> >
sage-9.1.beta8 on Ubuntu Linux 20.04 LTS Focal Fossa.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this
So is it the master branch or the develop branch? and git push right?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To
Hi Dima,
On Freitag, 3. April 2020 19:13:50 CEST Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:44 AM Ferdinand Ihringer
> wrote:
> Certainly we can make that function more general, and test for the
> strongly regular needs elsewhere.
That would be nice.
> (although functions with names
Dear Sage Developers,
My understanding is that I should ask for improvements here. Can one remove
the restriction on q in NonisotropicOrthogonalPolarGraph in
graphs/generators/classical_geometries.py? These graphs are nice for
general q, see [1] or [2].
My current hack is to change
if m
Somehow I can seem to upgrade sage with the sage -upgrade command it gives
me this error: error: cannot open .git/FETCH_HEAD: Permission denied
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
sabe-9.1.beta8 on Ubuntu Linux 20.04 LTS Focal Fossa
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this
sage -upgrade is obsolete and should be removed.
It's better to install a new version from source.
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:45 AM Ethan Lin wrote:
>
> Somehow I can seem to upgrade sage with the sage -upgrade command it gives me
> this error: error: cannot open .git/FETCH_HEAD: Permission
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 1:06 AM Ethan Lin wrote:
>
> So is it the master branch or the develop branch? and git push right?
it's develop branch (master is for releases), and it's pull, not push.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-devel"
Hi Ferdinand,
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:44 AM Ferdinand Ihringer
wrote:
>
> My understanding is that I should ask for improvements here. Can one remove
> the restriction on q in NonisotropicOrthogonalPolarGraph in
> graphs/generators/classical_geometries.py? These graphs are nice for general
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:57 AM Ethan Lin wrote:
>
> sabe-9.1.beta8 on Ubuntu Linux 20.04 LTS Focal Fossa
Did you install it from source?
If so, then use git to get an update, then run
./bootstrap
make
otherwise, if it was binary, get a newer binary.
>
> --
> You received this message because
I forgot a minor remark.
On Freitag, 3. April 2020 19:13:50 CEST Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:44 AM Ferdinand Ihringer
> wrote:
> > My understanding is that I should ask for improvements here. Can one
> > remove the restriction on q in NonisotropicOrthogonalPolarGraph in
> >
21 matches
Mail list logo
