[sage-devel] Re: cocalc and sagemath webpage

Acknowledging first all that William did and the fact that Harald is currently maintaining the website, I think that the Sage website should remove the links to Cocalc from the front page. Perhaps they can be collected in a displayed box dedicated for sponsors. -- You received this

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X Big Sur progress report

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:23 AM Andrew wrote: > > Thanks for this John. Did you do anything special to compile sage with big > sur? I just tried: > > make distclean && source .homebrew-build-env && ./configure > --with-system-gfortran=no --with-system-openblas=no --with-system-gmp=no && > make

[sage-devel] Re: OS X Big Sur progress report

Thanks for this John. Did you do anything special to compile sage with big sur? I just tried: make distclean && source .homebrew-build-env && ./configure --with-system-gfortran=no --with-system-openblas=no --with-system-gmp=no && make but the build fails with: Error building Sage. The

[sage-devel] Mathics 1.1.0 released

... and just when you thought we'd never get around to it. This is now available from PyPI. It might be a simple as: $ pip install Mathics3 Note the "3" at the end. Without that you get the pre 1.1.0 code. Or you can run from the recently updated

[sage-devel] Re: Docker images

Dima Pasechnik wrote: > hopefully everything needed to fix docker builds will be merged in the > coming beta. Ok, thank you! -- Marc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 9.3 release cycle

I think there are pros and cons to looking at the Milestone field; In particular, if scripts evaluate it then it must always be set correctly or else your ticket is silently ignored forever. There is certainly a use case for deferring tickets, but you can do that already manually by depending

[sage-devel] Mathics 1.1.0 Released

.. and just when you thought we'd never get around to it. This is now available from PyPI. It might be a simple as: $ pip install Mathics Or you can run from the recently updated dockerhub image : $ docker

[sage-devel] cocalc and sagemath webpage

Dear all, Beware that this message may be controversial. If you look at https://www.sagemath.org/ you can see four links to cocalc, one of them hidden behind the icon "sage". So, taking great care to acknowledge first all that William did and the fact that Harald is currently maintaining the

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 9.3 release cycle

It does not look like https://trac.sagemath.org/rpc#rpc.ticket.milestone reveals this information. But surely your scripts must have a notion of the current release series for calling sage-update-version? On Sunday, November 15, 2020 at 2:42:30 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > I think there are

Re: [sage-devel] polynomial_modn_dense_ntl.pyx -- small_roots function -- minor change

On 11/4/20 3:37 AM, Adam Larat wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I hope I am posting at the correct place. > > There is a minor bug in the verbose output of the small_roots function... Thanks, this should be a quick fix: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30921 -- You received this message because you

Re: [sage-devel] polynomial_modn_dense_ntl.pyx -- small_roots function -- minor change

On 11/4/20 3:37 AM, Adam Larat wrote: > I would be glad to contribute if you indicate me the procedure to > follow, Oh, I just saw this part now. Most of the process is covered by https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/index.html but can be simplified if you're used to contributing to

[sage-devel] Re: Docker images

This will depend on when https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30874 will be merged. And even still, there may be some other bad surprises in the build process Le dimanche 15 novembre 2020 à 09:53:11 UTC+1, Marc Mezzarobba a écrit : > Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > hopefully everything needed to fix