Hi,
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 21:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Alexandre Blondin Massé
alexandre.blondin.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
- There is only one day available, which is September 1st, for this
Sage Day (not official, I know, but I can still call it that way!). We
have the whole day. Maybe starting around
- Lastly, from memory, among the developpers, there will be Sébastien,
Vincent, Franco (not sure about him), Christian (Stump), you and I.
I will definitely be there!
Franco
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-combinat-devel group.
To post
Hi!
Thanks Florent for starting this topic. It's time to start organizing this!
- I have already the rights to put web pages on the LaCIM server:
therefore, I can be in charge of the website for this Sage Day.
Alex, I propose not to do a web page on the LaCIM server. My opinion
is that web
Hi Alexandre,
I'll meet next week with Sébastien and we'll start thinking more
deeply about the logistic of the event.
Looking forward to seeing you again in Montreal !
Ok ! I'll contact you when I arrive in Montreal !
Good summer !
Florent
--
You received this message because you
So I will create such a page right now and will try to gather all the
basic informations we have (date, people attending, objective ...). I
think it can be a good way to start the organisation.
The page is up (it is a first version) :
http://wiki.sagemath.org/days25.5
I put the information I
Alex, I propose not to do a web page on the LaCIM server. My opinion
is that web pages are often not that practical for Sage Days because
it centralizes its management. A wiki page is lot more convenient. It
can be updated by anyone, people can add their pdf presentations, etc.
So I will
We should definitely include talking about iterators, since they are
very useful for enumeration purposes and the audience will be
interested in that. I know that we will talk about it, but, in my
opinion, it would be good to show many examples of iterators over
various structures and maybe even
On 08/ 7/10 04:48 AM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
We're in the *very* early stages of developing a new doctesting API at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9224
Unifying sage-test and sage-ptest does make sense.
I'm not over-impressed with the current system. I've had tests fail with zero
On Aug 3, 5:52 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
6. TRANSPOSE/CONJUGATE
It seems that implementing this would just involve modifying the
__pos__(self) method for complexes, matrices and complex matrices, and
I think that both conjugating and transposing are common enough
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:52 PM, cousteau cousteaulecommand...@gmail.com wrote:
The aim of my syntax suggestion wasn't to clone Matlab's syntax, but
to provide an easy way to input matrices.
Speaking of syntax and matrices, let's not forget the seemingly
bizarre behavior one gets when one does
Yes, sorry for not providing email addresses. It is best to write to
the contact address on the MPIR webpage, or email me and I'll pass the
message on to the MPIR developers.
Of course if it is not confidential, please post directly to the MPIR
development list (in CC).
Thanks,
Bill.
On 7 Aug,
On 08/ 7/10 01:25 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
Yes, sorry for not providing email addresses. It is best to write to
the contact address on the MPIR webpage, or email me and I'll pass the
message on to the MPIR developers.
Of course if it is not confidential, please post directly to the MPIR
development
sympow seems to have presented some problems on Solaris 10 on x86. I've tried
looking at this source code, and it makes little sense whatsoever to me.
William has tried to clean up the 'Configure' script, though it's still very
messy, with things like
SH=`whichexe sh` echo #define SH \$SH\
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 02:47:45PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
sympow seems to have presented some problems on Solaris 10 on x86. I've
tried looking at this source code, and it makes little sense whatsoever
to me.
snip
Anyway, that aside, lets get to the C source code.
I tried to
On 08/ 7/10 03:37 PM, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
From my experience, by far the most efficient way of writing cross-platform
code is being reasonably aware of the relevant standards, and then simply fix
any remaining issues as they pop up.
Please don't take this the wrong way, as I greatly
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 03:59:49PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 08/ 7/10 03:37 PM, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
From my experience, by far the most efficient way of writing cross-platform
Who are you quoting?
I'm not quoting. Somewhere in the email chain the escaped From wasn't
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:52 PM, cousteau cousteaulecommand...@gmail.com
wrote:
The aim of my syntax suggestion wasn't to clone Matlab's syntax, but
to provide an easy way to input matrices.
Speaking of syntax and
Hi sage-devel,
According to http://wiki.sagemath.org/Workshops the upcoming Sage
workshops are :
* Sage Days 25 -- Mumbai, India (August 9-12, 2010); funded by India
* Sage Days 26 -- Kaiserslautern, Germany (August 27-31, 2010); funded
by Germany
But according to
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:31 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:52 PM, cousteau cousteaulecommand...@gmail.com
wrote:
The aim of my syntax suggestion wasn't to clone Matlab's syntax, but
to
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Removing the package from unstable doesn't prevent you from working on
the package. It's just a way to clean up Debian. It will be very easy to
re-upload when you will have something that builds in i386 and amd64
(though it might be better to
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM, slabbe sla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi sage-devel,
According to http://wiki.sagemath.org/Workshops the upcoming Sage
workshops are :
* Sage Days 25 -- Mumbai, India (August 9-12, 2010); funded by India
* Sage Days 26 -- Kaiserslautern, Germany (August 27-31,
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Kamaraju,
Overall I like your plan. And I'd like to help.
I do not like starting with version 3.0.6. I think such an old version
is unlikely to attract many users and hence testing will be suboptimal.
In addition, upstream reports
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, tabb...@ksplice.com wrote:
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Kamaraju,
Overall I like your plan. And I'd like to help.
I do not like starting with version 3.0.6. I think such an old version
is unlikely to attract many users and hence
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, tabb...@ksplice.com wrote:
I think there are a couple new dependencies that are not in Debian; there
weren't any as of version 4.0 or so. I would recommend first getting
sagemath working building the copies
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Tim Abbott tabb...@mit.edu wrote:
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, tabb...@ksplice.com wrote:
I think there are a couple new dependencies that are not in Debian; there
weren't any as of version 4.0 or so. I would
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca wrote:
When I paste the following code into a notebook worksheet in magma
mode, I consistently get Syntax Error. When I paste the same code
directly into magma, it works properly:
{{{
_x:=PolynomialRing(Rationals());
repeat
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9705
exact traceback in ticket.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
Hi folks,
We're releasing Sage 4.5.2. Many thanks to everyone for their
contributions, including numerous patches, packages, reviews,
troubleshooting, emails posts, and build test reports!
Source archive:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.5.2/sage-4.5.2.tar
Upgrade path:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Mitesh Patel qed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
We're releasing Sage 4.5.2. Many thanks to everyone for their
contributions, including numerous patches, packages, reviews,
troubleshooting, emails posts, and build test reports!
Thanks. I'm building binaries
On Aug 7, 2010, at 14:13 , Mitesh Patel wrote:
Hi folks,
We're releasing Sage 4.5.2. Many thanks to everyone for their
contributions, including numerous patches, packages, reviews,
troubleshooting, emails posts, and build test reports!
Source archive:
Maurizio's function is pretty nice! It's exactly what I was looking
for. I think it should be included in future releases. But it's a bit
slow (at least for the 1..1e9 range), maybe it should be rewritten or
compiled.
The only thing I didn't like is that it saves the image to the current
Upgraded from .rc1 which was in turn upgraded from .rc0, on Mac OS X,
10.5.8 (Dual Quad Xeon), w/o problems.
One test failed (ptestlong):
devel/sage/sage/plot/plot3d/base.pyx
4 instances of _imaging C module is not installed.
Try a search for imaging C module not installed mac -
In your opinion, is it better to leave the current behavior of including
fpu.c on Itanium Linux systems, or just remove that since it will be safer?
Be a bit careful with the language here. If someone has an older
(pre-Montecito) Itanium, then from what I understand it is perfectly
plausible
33 matches
Mail list logo
