[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Add support for uploading static html doc page as a worksheet in the notebook

2011-04-06 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Dear Jeroen, dear Jason, dear all, On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:47:41PM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: Last january, I wrote a small and local patch to the notebook code allowing for for uploading static html doc page as a worksheet in the notebook #10652. As a side effect, it: *

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Add support for uploading static html doc page as a worksheet in the notebook

2011-04-06 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi, On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:47:41PM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: Last january, I wrote a small and local patch to the notebook code allowing for for uploading static html doc page as a worksheet in the notebook #10652. As a side effect, it: * allows for uploading a

[sage-combinat-devel] #7922

2011-04-06 Thread Daniel Bump
Hi Nicolas, I saw your reviewer patch for #7922 (thanks). There were a couple of further minor revisions which are in the patch trac_7922_alpha3-changes.patch that I put in the combinat queue. The patch: trac_7922-rebased-4.7.alpha3.patch that is now on the trac server is the sum of the

[sage-devel] Re: Add support for uploading static html doc page as a worksheet in the notebook

2011-04-06 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Dear Jeroen, dear Jason, dear all, On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:47:41PM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: Last january, I wrote a small and local patch to the notebook code allowing for for uploading static html doc page as a worksheet in the notebook #10652. As a side effect, it: *

Re: [sage-devel] Another zn_poly problem

2011-04-06 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2011-04-05 22:44, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: make: getcwd: No such file or directory make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. Error building zn_poly. I agree with Justin. getcwd means get current working directory. This is probably a bug in make, libc or the operating

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage and gcc 4.3.0

2011-04-06 Thread Han Frederic
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:12:37PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: On 04/ 5/11 03:06 PM, Bill Hart wrote: One possibly data point is that GCC 4.3.2 miscompiles GMP and MPIR on x86_64 and as far as I know cannot and will not be worked around. Thank you for that. I'm not going to address the

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Add support for uploading static html doc page as a worksheet in the notebook

2011-04-06 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi, On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:47:41PM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: Last january, I wrote a small and local patch to the notebook code allowing for for uploading static html doc page as a worksheet in the notebook #10652. As a side effect, it: * allows for uploading a

Re: [sage-devel] Another zn_poly problem

2011-04-06 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 04/ 6/11 08:07 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2011-04-05 22:44, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: make: getcwd: No such file or directory make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. Error building zn_poly. I agree with Justin. getcwd means get current working directory. This is

Re: [sage-devel] has Apple effectively forked gcc?

2011-04-06 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 04/ 6/11 02:21 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: In XCode 4.0.1, the default C compiler (cc) is gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2335.9) (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Level_Virtual_Machine) whereas it also has gcc: gcc version 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot

[sage-devel] Join the Sage IRC channel!

2011-04-06 Thread Keshav Kini
Hi, I'd like to advertise our IRC channel a little bit, as it is getting very quiet in there these days. If you are on Freenode IRC, it would be great if you could idle in #sagemath (the old #sage-devel channel has lapsed its registration and Harald Schilly has made this new one). It's a

[sage-devel] Re: Join the Sage IRC channel!

2011-04-06 Thread kcrisman
P.S. If anyone has access to the sagemath.org website, could you please updatehttp://sagemath.org/help-irc.htmland the related pages (such as the Java IRC client) to send users to #sagemath instead of #sage-devel ? That would be great. As a followup to this, now that Google Groups has gotten

[sage-devel] Please test new version of sqlite

2011-04-06 Thread Dr David Kirkby
I've placed here an updated package with the latest version of sqlite, as the one we have in Sage is 2-3 years old. http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/patches/sqlite-3.7.5.spkg I've built Sage from scratch using this, and found all doctests passed. But I'd be interested how it works

[sage-devel] Fwd: [cython-users] Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference

2011-04-06 Thread William Stein
-- Forwarded message -- From: Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com Date: Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:26 AM Subject: [cython-users] Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference To: IPython Development list ipython-...@scipy.org, IPython User list ipython-u...@scipy.org, cython-users

[sage-devel] Re: [cython-users] Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference

2011-04-06 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com Date: Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:26 AM Subject: [cython-users] Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference To: IPython Development list

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: [cython-users] Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference

2011-04-06 Thread Fernando Perez
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com Date: Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:26 AM Subject: [cython-users] Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference To: IPython Development list

Re: [sage-devel] Please test new version of sqlite

2011-04-06 Thread Francois Bissey
I've placed here an updated package with the latest version of sqlite, as the one we have in Sage is 2-3 years old. http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/patches/sqlite-3.7.5.spkg I've built Sage from scratch using this, and found all doctests passed. But I'd be interested how it

[sage-devel] Re: Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference

2011-04-06 Thread kcrisman
In case people are curious, Sage (because of Singular!) takes 0.07 seconds to do the benchmark that Sympy takes 11 seconds to do at the end of the Sympy talk:    http://flask.sagenb.org/home/pub/16/ I noticed that the talk said Sympy has Mma and Maple parsing. We have something like this,

Re: [sage-devel] Please test new version of sqlite

2011-04-06 Thread David Kirkby
On 6 April 2011 19:38, Francois Bissey francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote: I've placed here an updated package with the latest version of sqlite, Hi Dave, we have been using sqlite 3.7.x in sage-on-gentoo since about November 2010 (when 3.7.2 was marked stable). 3.7.5 works great.

[sage-devel] MPIR seg fault when building Sage from source on Linux

2011-04-06 Thread IanSR
I've just downloaded Sage 4.6.2 and have spent the past hour trying to sort out an error with the MPIR 1.2.2.p2 compilation. Here are some extracts which could help someone tell me if I've done something strange. Ian #./configure output:

Re: [sage-devel] MPIR seg fault when building Sage from source on Linux

2011-04-06 Thread David Kirkby
On 6 April 2011 21:24, IanSR ijsto...@hkl.hms.harvard.edu wrote: I've just downloaded Sage 4.6.2 and have spent the past hour trying to sort out an error with the MPIR 1.2.2.p2 compilation.  Here are some extracts which could help someone tell me if I've done something strange. Ian I don't

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [cython-users] Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference

2011-04-06 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:45 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: -- Forwarded message -- [...] Hi all, sorry for the massive cross-post, but since all these projects were highlighted with talks at

Fwd: [sympy] Re: [sage-devel] Re: [cython-users] Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference

2011-04-06 Thread Ondrej Certik
Forwarding Mateusz's reply. -- Forwarded message -- From: Mateusz Paprocki Date: Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:14 PM Subject: Re: [sympy] Re: [sage-devel] Re: [cython-users] Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference To: sy...@googlegroups.com Cc: sage-devel@googlegroups.com Hi,

[sage-devel] error doing install_package('glpk')

2011-04-06 Thread VictorMiller
I got a cython error. On on a Mac book pro running OSX 10.6 with sage 4.6.2 64 bit: cythoning patch/mipGlpk.pyx to patch/mipGlpk.cpp Error converting Pyrex file to C: ... # Builds the GLPK version of the problem

[sage-devel] Re: has Apple effectively forked gcc?

2011-04-06 Thread Felix Lawrence
On Apr 6, 7:19 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: There seems to be a growing body of opinion that Clang http://clang.llvm.org/ will replace gcc as the compiler of choice for open-source projects - not just on OS X. I've heard this too. I also noticed that Xcode is no

[sage-devel] Re: has Apple effectively forked gcc?

2011-04-06 Thread kcrisman
For many people, this would make Sage no longer free - it would effectively cost $5 and none of that money goes to Sage. Well, you could still download a binary. They aren't requiring that people give them money from things compiled with it, are they? But I agree it's a problem, if true. $5

Re: [sage-devel] error doing install_package('glpk')

2011-04-06 Thread Robert Miller
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:37 PM, VictorMiller victorsmil...@gmail.com wrote: cdef int build_glp_prob(c_glp_prob * lp, c_glp_iocp * iocp, LP, int log, bool names) except -1: ^

[sage-devel] Re: error doing install_package('glpk')

2011-04-06 Thread Dima Pasechnik
glpk is a standard spkg. Version 4.44, if I am right. So you seem to have tried installing an optional glpk version 4.42. This looks like a case for it to be removed. I already suggested this a while ago, but got a reply from someone that it's OK to keep it. Dima On Apr 7, 7:37 am,

[sage-devel] Absolute value of a matrix...

2011-04-06 Thread Rob Beezer
... is the determinant? Does this make sense to anyone? Am I missing something? I can't think of a reason why, and the documentation (sage.matrix.matrix2.Matrix._abs_) does not shed any extra light on the reason. This came up on sage-support

[sage-devel] fix install_package() to do version-checking

2011-04-06 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Having optional package GLPK breaks things for people who try to install it by mistake. Simply removing it from the optional repository will break things for people who still run an old version of Sage, from the times it was still optional. Either we decide to drop supporting these users and

[sage-devel] Re: fix install_package() to do version-checking

2011-04-06 Thread Simon King
Hi Dima, On 7 Apr., 05:13, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote: Either we decide to drop supporting these users and remove the optional glpk, or fix install_package(), and probably optional_packages(), too to make them version-sensitive. It *is* supposed to be version-sensitive, IIRC. --