Yeah, so the failure's definitely happening in the check for version
guards. I added a couple print statements in the update script to try
to figure out what's happening; does this look like the right kind of
thing to you?
current sage version: [4, 6, 2]
hg_all_guards: ['guards in series
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 03:29:41AM -0700, tom d wrote:
Yeah, so the failure's definitely happening in the check for version
guards. I added a couple print statements in the update script to try
to figure out what's happening; does this look like the right kind of
thing to you?
current sage
Le 12/05/2011 17:13, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4.7
in about a week or so.
sage-4.7rc2
On 05/15/11 08:47 AM, Julien PUYDT wrote:
Le 12/05/2011 17:13, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release
On 05/15/11 08:47 AM, Julien PUYDT wrote:
Le 12/05/2011 17:13, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release
Maybe the following workaround attempt
will be helpful?
var('x,mp,me')
eq=mp-sqrt(x^2+me^2)==x
assume(mp0)
solve(eq^2,x)
[x == 1/2*(me^2 - mp^2)/mp, x == -1/2*(me^2 - mp^2)/mp]
On 15 Maj, 01:34, Dox o.castillo.felis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again list,
This time I come with a problem of
I think it would be nice if our Sage VM appliance could run on a wide
variety of hardware, much as Sage itself does not require high-end
machines to work.
-- Kelvin
Very true - if Sage is primarily a research tool for mathematicians
then one doesn't need to worry about ressources to much.
I had (what appeared to me to be) same/similar problems with UBUNTU
11.04
I had NOT attempted to install flask.
The sage -fhttp://users.aims.ac.za/~jan/python-2.6.4.p10.spkg;
appeared to resolve that,
but I had to re-build docs to get the help and the tutorial up.
I run the plot3d examples as a
I played a bit with gource, a project to visualize the repository activity.
Here is a quick YouTube video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOdzratlbQAhd=1
* Every file is a dot, colored by file type
* Directories are branches of the tree
--
To post to this group, send an email to
Le 12/05/2011 17:13, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4.7
in about a week or so.
I gave it a
You are right, once again we see why LD_LIBRARY_PATH should not be set. I
posted a workaround in
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/hLL02U1Q5zU/discussion
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
Le 15/05/2011 13:45, Volker Braun a écrit :
You are right, once again we see why LD_LIBRARY_PATH should not be set.
I posted a workaround in
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/hLL02U1Q5zU/discussion
Good to know, but I'm not interested in a workaround : I just wanted to
give
Le 15/05/2011 14:13, Julien PUYDT a écrit :
I'm still using latest stable :-)
Well, I *was* still using it : I decided to check if it was still
compiling correctly too, so I removed it and gave it a try : it doesn't
compile anymore :-)
(not a big problem -- I wouldn't have tried that if I
On 2011-05-13 07:24, Tom Boothby wrote:
Bottom line: I think this was handled wrong. If a ticket's been
merged, unless it's found to have a genuine flaw, it should supersede
(IMO) tickets with positive reviews which have not been merged.
In this case, the *author* of those tickets decided to
On 2011-05-15 16:15, Julien PUYDT wrote:
Le 15/05/2011 14:13, Julien PUYDT a écrit :
I'm still using latest stable :-)
Well, I *was* still using it : I decided to check if it was still
compiling correctly too, so I removed it and gave it a try : it doesn't
compile anymore :-)
(not a big
Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2011-05-13 07:24, Tom Boothby wrote:
Bottom line: I think this was handled wrong. If a ticket's been
merged, unless it's found to have a genuine flaw, it should supersede
(IMO) tickets with positive reviews which have not been merged.
In this
squaring both sides of an equation often produces extraneous
solutions as you've illustrated.
Maxima's solve program produces the illustrated form when it cannot
solve any better. It is presumably a feature.
Also a feature: It does not produce extraneous solutions and check
them afterwards, at
Fair enough. I think 32-bit guests can work with software virtualization
irregardless of the processor/host OS bitwidth, so thats probably safer. I
made another VM with F14 i386 + Sage-4.6.2:
http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/Sage-4.6.2.ova
Volker
--
To post to this group, send an email to
18 matches
Mail list logo
