Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error building package python3-3.6.1.p1 Sage 8.1 on Mac

On Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 12:22:18 AM UTC+1, Christelle Vincent wrote: > > Done! Thanks! > > On Saturday, April 28, 2018 at 6:45:31 PM UTC-4, Samuel Lelievre wrote: >> >> Congratulations for building SageMath! >> >> You can now rename /local/bin_bak, /local/share_bak and /local/lib_bak >>

Re: [sage-devel] Sage 8.2rc1 and Ubuntu 18.04: ecm fails to build

On Saturday, April 28, 2018 at 7:41:49 PM UTC-5, Erik Bray wrote: > > I just finished a full build from scratch on Ubuntu 18.04 and it went > fine. This was of 8.2.rc4. > > I don't recall off the top of my head whether anything changed between > rc1 and rc4 that might have effected this, but

Re: [sage-devel] Sage 8.2rc1 and Ubuntu 18.04: ecm fails to build

I just finished a full build from scratch on Ubuntu 18.04 and it went fine. This was of 8.2.rc4. I don't recall off the top of my head whether anything changed between rc1 and rc4 that might have effected this, but you might try bumping a rc4 just in case. On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 1:03 AM, Erik

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error building package python3-3.6.1.p1 Sage 8.1 on Mac

Done! Thanks! On Saturday, April 28, 2018 at 6:45:31 PM UTC-4, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > Congratulations for building SageMath! > > You can now rename /local/bin_bak, /local/share_bak and /local/lib_bak > back to their original names. (And just temporarily rename them to the > _bak version when

Re: [sage-devel] Sage 8.2rc1 and Ubuntu 18.04: ecm fails to build

Thanks for the report--I have yet to try doing anything on Ubuntu 18.04, but I'll try it now and see if I get the same. On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 5:47 AM, Nathan Dunfield wrote: > Dear Sage folks, > > I tried building Sage 8.2rc1 on a clean Docker container running the newly

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error building package python3-3.6.1.p1 Sage 8.1 on Mac

Congratulations for building SageMath! You can now rename /local/bin_bak, /local/share_bak and /local/lib_bak back to their original names. (And just temporarily rename them to the _bak version when you need to build SageMath. Happy SageMath usage and development! 2018-04-29 0:20 GMT+02:00

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error building package python3-3.6.1.p1 Sage 8.1 on Mac

Thanks! I actually went ahead and tried and built 8.1 and that worked!! So I think that whatever you suggested before with exporting the path and renaming local/bin, local/share and local/lib worked! Thank you so much to everyone who helped with this, I really appreciate finally being able to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error building package python3-3.6.1.p1 Sage 8.1 on Mac

Try 8.2.rc2 with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25118 on top of it. This would not build gcc, but rather use Xcode's C compiler. In his infinite wisdom the release manager decided to wait till 8.3 with it... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error building package python3-3.6.1.p1 Sage 8.1 on Mac

I had not typed that. In general if something was not explicitly said then I didn't do it, because while I can develop for Sage I'm not good enough with the guts of a computer to know to do anything extra. Anyway, after make distclean, I couldn't build gcc-7.2.0, which at the very beginning

[sage-devel] Re: Re: Problem of reduction of rational functions

A few comments. 1. Giving someone a surprising or undesirable result because a GCD computation is considered expensive sounds like a really bad idea. (I believe I'm overstating the situation here, but that's sort of what it sounds like. 2. (Judging from Macsyma/Maxima) it is ok, workable, and

[sage-devel] Compilation of custom C code from Cython

Hi, I have code on https://github.com/okazymyrov/sbox. It works fine with sage 7.1 . However, in SageMath 8.1 I get warnings like: /Users/okazymyrov/bin/sage8.1/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/misc/ cython.py:313: DeprecationWarning: the Sage-specific Cython pragma '#clang' is

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error building package python3-3.6.1.p1 Sage 8.1 on Mac

after these changes in /usr/local, did you do make distclean without it, stuff in /usr/local that you moved away could be still linked to, and could cause all sorts of errors. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe