Hello,
I would appreciate very much if somebody could add the following thing
to the symmetric functions in sage. Mostly this is just a variant of
the omega function, which is implemented by transposition of
partitions in the schur basis. The point is that I just do not dare to
do it myself...
for positive roots, but for positve linear combinations of
positive roots.. And the behaviour is not coherent, which was the
cause of my initial problem.
Somebody has an idea for a better name ?
Frederic
On 14 juin, 13:54, Frédéric Chapoton fchapot...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have found the following
Hi Christian,
well, I have not yet uploaded this patch to track, because I do not
feel very confident (the procedure seems too complicated to me..) If
somebody has some time to help..
By the way, do you know if there is a way in Sage to try something on
all posets of size 6, 7 or even 8 ? I
Salut,
je suis supposé faire quoi ? Comment je peux savoir pourquoi le patch
trac_10167-posets_Jposet_ARmatrix_fc.patch pose probleme ?
Frédéric
On 22 jan, 16:40, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr wrote:
Hi there,
I just put a guard on the following patches:
I have found the following problem.
sage: Set([len([v for v in mySet if v==u]) for u in mySet])
{1, 2}
sage: type(mySet)
class 'sage.sets.set.Set_object_enumerated_with_category'
So we have here a *set with repetitions*. This happens for a very
specific set mySet which contains linear
Salut,
it will take a lot of place to give here all the procedures needed to
enable you to run this example. This is ok for me, but this is maybe
not the place for this ?
Here is a little more detail, a reduced example, coming from the
problem above.
sage: kiki
{B[[1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0,
Frédéric Chapoton fchapot...@gmail.com:
Here is a little more detail, a reduced example, coming from the
problem above.
sage: kiki
{B[[1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0]] + B[[1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0]]
+ B[[1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0]] + B[[1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0,
0]] + B[[1, 0, 1, 1
Hello Christian,
first, thanks a lot for your hard job on many interesting topics. This
is certainly a useful thing to have clusters here.
I would have a suggestion, but I have not checked whether you have
already done that : define the fan associated with the cluster
complex. I am not really
Salut Nicolas,
ok, tu as le feu vert pour modifier mon patch pour enlever la
dependance.
I think the method auslander_reiten_matrix should really be called
*coxeter_transformation*, because this is the usual name. One speaks
of the Auslander-Reiten functor, but this is not the same thing.
Once
Hello Hugh,
I have the same problem. As far as I understand, this should be solved
by Mike. One can only wait and hope.
cheers,
Frederic
On 1 juin, 04:54, Hugh Thomas hugh.ross.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear friends of the queue--
With sage-4.6.2, running sage -combinat update, I got:
Merci beaucoup !
I will take care of the folding and try to clean up as soon as I can.
Frederic
On 1 juil, 23:23, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr wrote:
Hi Fr d ric,
Sorry for not answering sooner. I was giving a talk at Strasbourg at Kurush
and Frederic F. conference). So
I have found the following bug. When one tries to replace a full tree
by another tree, using the *empty path* as an adress, this does not
work.
sage: lt=LabelledOrderedTrees()
sage: toto=lt([lt([lt([],None)],None)],None)
sage: titi=lt([lt([],'a')],'a')
sage: toto[()]
None[None[None[]]]
sage: with
Here is a try
Z=species.SingletonSpecies()
E2=species.SetSpecies(min=2)
P=CombinatorialSpecies()
S=CombinatorialSpecies()
P.define(E2.composition(Z+S))
S.define(E2.composition(Z+P))
N=Z+P+S
That seems to work :
sage: koko=N.generating_series().coefficients(8)
sage: [koko[i]*factorial(i) for i
Hello,
Trying to use inversions for elements of Weyl groups, I found that it
exists, but does not work, and is badly documented and tested. In which
patch is this located ?
Frederic
sage: W=WeylGroup(['A',3])
sage: w=W.from_reduced_word([1,2,1])
sage: w.inversions()
AttributeError:
Here is a correct version. I am not currently able to post patches (still
working with 4.7.1 here..)
def inversions(self):
EXAMPLES::
sage: W = WeylGroup(['A',3])
sage: w = W.from_reduced_word([1,2,1])
sage: w.inversions()
[(0, 1, -1, 0, 0, 0), (1,
This is now
Ticket #12770 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12770
If somebody can cross-post to sage-devel, it would be great, yes.
Should I create another ticket for products of posets ?
Frederic
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Le mercredi 28 mars 2012 23:14:33 UTC+2, Nicolas M. Thiery a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 05:03:37AM -0700, Fr�d�ric Chapoton wrote:
If somebody can cross-post to sage-devel, it would be great, yes.
Done.
Should I create another ticket for products of posets ?
Please!
Hello,
I have the same problem, with 5.0 beta8 :
/home/chapoton/sage-5.0.beta8/spkg/bin/sage: line 308: 2466 Erreur de
segmentation sage-ipython $@ -i
Frederic
Le lundi 23 avril 2012 18:16:52 UTC+2, Anne Schilling a écrit :
Thank you! But now sage won't even start any longer for me with
Hello,
trying to test my own files on sage 5.0, it seems that it takes many import
statements. Some of them behave strangely :
sage: import_statements(euler_phi)
from sage.rings.arith import Number of positive integers =n but relatively
prime to n
sage: import_statements(QQ)
from
Well, there should be no problem with my patch, as it does just create a
new file and does not touch anything else. The need for a merge was
triggered because you did not update sage-combinat before commiting. This
is normal and rather harmless, unless two persons work on the same files at
the
Hello,
I was told to rebase a patch (namely
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13067) by the release manager.
What is the procedure to do that ? I have not found it on the mercurial
guide (http://wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/MercurialStepByStep).
I have only a rather basic understanding
Hello Anne,
my patch
trac_13088_paley_graphs-fc.patch #+5_2_rc0 needs
rebase on 5_2_rc0!!!
has been merged in 5.2rc0. see :
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13088
Should I simple delete it from the queue ?
Frederic
Le mercredi 25 juillet 2012 00:57:19 UTC+2,
Hello,
Well, this looks like a very interesting thing to add to sage. I am sure
that the graph-guys around here would be enthousiastic, were it not for the
summer vacations..
Could you open a ticket on trac for that ? and prepare and upload a patch ?
Do you need help to do that ?
Salut Matthieu,
il ne faut pas d'accents dans le chemin de sage : le mot Thèse avec un
accent pose probleme, je crois...
ressaye d'installer dans un repertoire sans accent.
Fred
Le jeudi 19 juillet 2012 21:54:53 UTC+2, Martin a écrit :
I just wanted to test whether some experimental changes
ouarf.. :) damned !
Bon, bon, je ne sais pas trop quoi dire. Il faudrait retrouver le fichier
sage et le remettre la ou il doit etre, i.e. dans le repertoire
home/matthieu/sage-5.1. Si tu l'as effectivement effacé, une maniere serait
peut-etre juste de re-decompacter le .tar *ailleurs*, et
Il faut utiliser with comme ca :
with T.clone() as TT:
TT[chemin[:-1]]=trees([],None)
Tant qu'on est dans le with l'arbre est mutable
Frederic
Le lundi 3 septembre 2012 18:57:51 UTC+2, Viviane Pons a écrit :
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to work with trees but I find them quite
Hello
on 5..5.rc0, with the latest sage-combinat queue fully applied, I got the
following error at start:
265 import sys
266 sys.path.append('/Users/andrew/Sage')
-- 267 from utility import trace_function
268
269
ImportError: No module named utility
Of course, I have no
Well, this is not exactly true, as the latex method is not modified in my
patch. I only introduce new methods (written just before the latex method
indeed)
Is there any conflict with my patch when you apply the queue in full ? does
it say that it need to be rebased ? or is there just a hunk ?
Hello,
I would like to change the default ordering of terms in some Modules with
basis, for the purpose of changing leading_term.
More precisely, I would like to use my own term-orders for some free
modules on LabelledOrderedTrees, a bit like the choice of term orders on
polynomials algebras
Hello,
merci ! Ca a l'air de marcher.
A bientot,
Frédéric
Le lundi 14 janvier 2013 10:38:05 UTC, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
Hello,
I would like to change the default ordering of terms in some Modules with
basis, for the purpose of changing leading_term.
More precisely, I would like
And it is spelled in sage/combinat with just one !
I have made a (little bomb) patch at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14673
turning everything to cristallographic
I think this is necessary, but I am afraid it may cause a lot of trouble in
the combinat queue
Opinions ?
Frederic
Yes indeed, and that is what I have done in the patch. Sorry for the
mistake here.
Le vendredi 31 mai 2013 22:44:37 UTC+2, Anne Schilling a écrit :
Hi Frederic,
If you want the English spelling, I think it is crystallographic.
Best,
Anne
On 5/31/13 12:41 PM, Fr�d�ric Chapoton
I vote for
1. The invalid path maps to the zero of the algebra,
since you have chosen to linearise the free category into an algebra,
that's the logical thing to do
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-combinat-devel group.
To unsubscribe from
Salut Jean-Yves
chez moi, je n'ai pas ton problème non plus
quelle version de sage tu as ? tape version() pour voir
tu peux me telephoner au boulot si tu veux (voir mon tel sur
http://math.univ-lyon1.fr/~chapoton/)
Fred
Le mardi 15 octobre 2013 16:23:14 UTC+2, Jean-Yves Thibon a écrit :
Hello,
There are some tickets about Puiseux series and Puiseux polynomials
awaiting on trac:
#9289 and #4618
http://trac.sagemath.org/query?status=!closedkeywords=~Puiseux
But they are not ready to use, as far as I know.
Fred
Le mardi 15 avril 2014 19:19:25 UTC+2, Mark Shimozono a écrit :
Dear sage-combinat participants,
currently, sage ships with broken scripts that were used to install the
mercurial version of the sage-combinat queue. This should be cleaned.
In http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15628, I have prepared the complete
removal of these scripts.
Also
Here is the result of running pep8 on the combinat folder :
35 E111 indentation is not a multiple of four
499 E201 whitespace after '('
17 E202 whitespace before ')'
52 E203 whitespace before ':'
57 E221 multiple spaces before operator
16 E222 multiple spaces after
The same in increasing order of number of occurences
[4 W601 .has_key() is deprecated, use 'in',
'16 E222 multiple spaces after operator',
17 E202 whitespace before ')',
'18 E301 expected 1 blank line, found 0',
'18 E702 multiple statements on one line (semicolon)',
After ticket #17270, with a more modern pep8, one gets
['2 E122 continuation line missing indentation or outdented',
2 E123 closing bracket does not match indentation of opening
bracket's line,
'2 E703 statement ends with a semicolon',
'4 E124 closing bracket does not
Hello everybody,
there is a post-doctoral position in algebraic combinatorics opening in
Lyon (France) next September.
Details can be found here:
http://math.univ-lyon1.fr/~chapoton/postdoc2015-2016.html
Please pass the word to people you know that could be interested. Lyon is a
nice city,
Working on ticket #14496 (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14496)
I have met the following problem:
I have defined a function q_binomial
and an alias for this function : gaussian_binomial
but the definition of q_binomial contains a reference, say to [iota2013]
Then the documentation
Hello,
I do not understand what the new plugin
plugins.doctest_continuationhttp://patchbot.sagemath.org/log/12848/Fedora/18/x86_64/3.8.11-200.fc18.x86_64/desktop/2013-05-17%2005:01:04%20+0100?plugin=plugins.doctest_continuation
is supposed to test.
Is it the plugin alluded to in the previous
This could be done as part of #14609 maybe ?
Le jeudi 6 juin 2013 11:18:40 UTC+2, John Cremona a écrit :
While reviewing #13591 I noticed that two functions on point on
elliptic curves over number fields are spelled incorrectly:
schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_point.py:2600:def
Well, the problem comes from
a.matrix()
which does not work. This is because it receives an incorrect number of
terms, so it cannot build the matrix. In turn, this is because
the length of (a**i).list() depends on i, which is maybe unexpected.
I have not tried to look further.
Frederic
Le
Bonjour Matthieu, je vais essayer d'expliquer comment je fais.
you can also work from a terminal, using sage -hg instead of hg_sage
inside sage. You have to be in your SAGE_DIRECTORY/devel/sage-main/
first step: create a patch
sage -hg qnew trac_14914_stuffle.patch
second step: create or
Hello,
for the sake of testing image filters, I would need to have a png and/or
jpg image available in the sage sources, and it should rather be a *
photograph*
does something like that already exist ? where ? there is nothing in
sage/media. Maybe in some tutorials ?
otherwise, maybe somebody
well, a very classical one !
thanks a lot
Frederic
Le jeudi 22 août 2013 21:42:41 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
$SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/mpl-data/sample_data/lena.jpg
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 8:38:28 PM UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
Hello
The banner does no longer look like that, it has been changed in 5.12.beta2.
Le dimanche 25 août 2013 11:02:45 UTC+2, P Purkayastha a écrit :
Hi devs,
How would you like a centered banner when sage is started? Is that
something desirable, or do you always prefer a left-aligned banner?
It seems that the patchbot currently does not work.
More precisely, it does not know where to stop in the dependencies to be
applied, and tries to apply very old (and since long included) dependencies
Just one example among many :
http://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/8388/
Patchbot is a great
Hello,
so far, the patchbot is not able to test the tickets given by a git branch
(and it seems that it does not recognize the branch field)
Would it be hard to get that working ? There are already several tickets
with a git branch waiting for review (just one example #15054)
Frederic
--
Hello,
it seems (the patchbot has told me) that I am not a default trusted user.
That must be the reason why the patchbot dos not look at my patches.
I feel a bit sad :( Not so long ago, the patchbot was working on my
patches very often.
If this is not a deliberate banishment (I hope not,
if not told otherwise
So, if somebody has the power to add me back, it would be great. Otherwise,
what should I do ?
Frederic
Le jeudi 12 septembre 2013 14:17:45 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
Hello,
it seems (the patchbot has told me) that I am not a default trusted user.
That must
trusted user. :)
Frederic
Le jeudi 12 septembre 2013 14:17:45 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
Hello,
it seems (the patchbot has told me) that I am not a default trusted user.
That must be the reason why the patchbot dos not look at my patches.
I feel a bit sad :( Not so long ago
for this ticket, even if you have
not contributed to the code. So my being non-trusted currently prevents the
bot to run on a lot of patches..
Frederic
Le jeudi 12 septembre 2013 14:17:45 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
Hello,
it seems (the patchbot has told me) that I am not a default
://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/?status=closed%20:%20fixedauthor=chapoton
and
http://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/?status=closedauthor=chapoton
So it would be good to try and find a better way to know who can be trusted
!
Cheers,
Frederic
Le jeudi 12 septembre 2013 14:17:45 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit
Thanks Robert for your answer !
I am trying to do that myself, but i am not an expert of github...
should i go on, or rather let you do that ?
Le jeudi 12 septembre 2013 14:17:45 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
Hello,
it seems (the patchbot has told me) that I am not a default trusted
Hello,
I have made a pull request at https://github.com/robertwb/sage-patchbot
I am not sure whether I have done the right changes in the sources of the
patchbot. I guess it is now up to Robert to give his opinion.
Frederic
Le jeudi 12 septembre 2013 14:17:45 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit
Hello,
If you want to run a patchbot on your own tickets, I would suggest the
following :
0) upload (i.e. clone) the latest patchbot from here :
https://github.com/robertwb/sage-patchbot
Then in a shell
1) cd sage-patchbot/src
2) ipython
3) from patchbot import Patchbot
4)
Hello,
since the new trac server introduced last week, the trac emails are
classified as spam in my mailbox. This is very inconvenient. Am I the only
one observing this ? If not, maybe this could be caused by a
misconfiguration of the new trac machine ?
Frédéric
--
You received this message
Hello everybody,
two things about the patchbots:
1) I would like to tell whoever is running the patchbot named
Fedora/19/x86_64/3.11.2-201.fc19.x86_64/desktophttp://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/?machine=Fedora/19/x86_64/3.11.2-201.fc19.x86_64/desktopstatus=open
that her/his patchbot is
version is in the spkg, but maybe
it needs to be updated. Maybe one should ask Robert Bradshaw what is the
current status of things ?
Frederic
Le mardi 22 octobre 2013 14:03:19 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 12:53:02 PM UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
1) I would
Hello
Since a few days, I am no longer receiving any email from trac, even in my
spam box..
Can somebody please confirm that this problem is still there ?
Frédéric
Le mercredi 23 octobre 2013 19:09:56 UTC+2, Keith Clawson a écrit :
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:21:21 AM UTC-7, Anne
Hello,
I have made a ticket #15335 (about removing the linefrom
sage.server.all import * )
Fred
Le dimanche 27 octobre 2013 19:09:52 UTC+1, William a écrit :
Hi,
I think the startup time of Sage may be starting to get out of control
again. For example, I'm concerned about some
Hello Anna,
primes_above is a *method* of number fields, you cannot import this (and
you do not need to import it to use it)
Frederic
Le jeudi 14 novembre 2013 21:30:10 UTC+1, Anna Haensch a écrit :
I'm running 5.11 (built from source-code). I went into the file
I have the same problem with #15550. Quite displeasant.
Frédéric
Le vendredi 20 décembre 2013 04:18:37 UTC+1, Travis Scrimshaw a écrit :
I'm getting the following error anytime I try to attach a new branch to a
ticket which previously didn't have one (in particular #12453 and #9280):
*Trac
Hello,
it seems that the patchbot has not really digested the git transition. I
would be happy to see it back, as it was very useful in the development
process in the mercurial era.
To modify the patchbot, you have to clone from here
https://github.com/robertwb/sage-patchbot
and then propose
Hello,
to avoid recompliation, I am rather doing the following (not sure if this
is a good thing to do) :
$ git fetch trac# needs to be in /sage
$ git ch develop# I switch to the develop branch
$ git pull trac develop # this updates to the latest developement version
of sage
$
Hello everybody,
In ordre to solve the problem raised in trac
#12706http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12706,
it is necessary to make a backward incompatible change, namely :
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12706
BEFORE:
at some point, in the doc, one can find something
Hello,
I have tried to build first 5.1 and then 5.2rc0 on an Dell E5500 laptop
running a brand new ubuntu. Both fails in the same way ; here below is a
small excerpt of the log.
What should I do ?
Thanks for your help
Frederic
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating
Frederic
Le lundi 23 juillet 2012 20:33:06 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
Hello,
I have tried to build first 5.1 and then 5.2rc0 on an Dell E5500 laptop
running a brand new ubuntu. Both fails in the same way ; here below is a
small excerpt of the log.
What should
oops, I have just shut the window and lost the messages.. :(
Where can I find this log file ?
Le lundi 23 juillet 2012 20:33:06 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
Hello,
I have tried to build first 5.1 and then 5.2rc0 on an Dell E5500 laptop
running a brand new ubuntu. Both fails
.rc0/spkg/build/givaro-3.2.13.p0'
'/home/chapoton/sage-5.2.rc0/sage' -sh)
When you are done debugging, you can type exit to leave the subshell.
Le lundi 23 juillet 2012 20:33:06 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
Hello
Thanks a lot. I reinstalled from scratch and it worked.
Le mardi 24 juillet 2012 10:31:42 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
This is because the error in building GCC sort of messed up the whole
build. Either reinstall from scratch, or reinstall MPIR using:
$ ./sage -f mpir
--
--
To
I am missing the patchbot, too.. Can we hope for its return soon ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
There is the same problem with ticket #8386 (
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8386)
Le mercredi 12 décembre 2012 18:48:50 UTC+1, Nils Bruin a écrit :
There's a patchbot problem on #8327 that needs more eyeballs (or at
least Robert's eyeballs):
The patchbot there sporadically
Hello everybody,
What do you think of the idea of adding two new roles (such as the ones
existing for trac and wikipedia) :
:arxiv:`hep-ph/0206021`
and
:doi:`10.1007/BF02546665`
The idea is to try to have more links in the references, towards the outer
web, so that one can click to the
This is not a bug, because x can be any complex number :
sage: x=CDF(4+2*I)
sage: abs(sin(x))**2
13.7268664349
sage: sin(x)**2
2.48667440045 + 13.4997523143*I
Le jeudi 14 février 2013 16:21:29 UTC+1, Julius a écrit :
I think (abs(sin(x))^2).simplify_full() should render sin(x)^2. This
Same for #8698 !
Le dimanche 20 juillet 2014 07:41:32 UTC+2, Ralf Stephan a écrit :
Hello,
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12455
gives me
*Trac detected an internal error:*
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/tmp/tmpfcOFO7'
Could an admin please have a look?
Regards,
Hello,
is there any spanish (native) speaker there, to have a quick look at
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/7192 that needs review ?
and maybe a catalan (native) speaker to look at
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12847 ?
Thanks,
Frederic
--
You received this message because you are
Hello everybody,
there is a rather simple ticket needing review that removes the last
mercurial footprints :
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16104
could you please have a look ?
Frederic
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To
I have made ticket #16738 for removing the long tests in
src/sage/combinat/cluster_algebra_quiver/mutation_type.py
Le mardi 29 juillet 2014 04:58:52 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
A small handful of modules takes the majority of the doctest walltime, see
e.g. this lopsided distribution:
Hello,
it works for me on sage 6.3.beta8, giving:
2201*xbar^2 + 487324445*xbar + 487325602
which version of sage do you use ? type version() to know that.
By the way, you should rather have asked that question on sage-support or
on ask.sagemath.org
Le jeudi 7 août 2014 16:03:43 UTC+2, Bill
Hello,
I am trying in #12212 to allow plotting colored 3D surfaces.
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12212
So far, progress has been done on jmol, tachyon and canvas3D viewers.
Does anybody know what is the viewer used in sagemath cloud ?
--
You received this message because you are
(you have to call it
explicitly as (threejs(plot(sin))), but they function differently. There
are some threads on the notebook list about three.js problems.
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:19:52 UTC-6, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
Hello,
I am trying in #12212 to allow plotting colored 3D surfaces
cannot experiment with it right now.
Frederic
Le vendredi 22 août 2014 06:09:03 UTC+2, jason a écrit :
On 8/21/14, 15:27, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
Thanks ! Do you know which file format is used by sagemath cloud to
communicate with threejs ? Is it .obj or .x3d or json ? Where can I find
Maybe it was caused by some temporary slowness of trac ?
Anyway, I have created #16872 to upgrade the patchbot to the latest
version. http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16872
Le vendredi 22 août 2014 12:17:21 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
Hello,
Given the message asking for patchbot
This could have some relation with http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15635,
maybe.
Le samedi 11 octobre 2014 03:26:24 UTC+2, Alasdair a écrit :
I've written an article about using Sage to develop explicit Runge-Kutta
formulas for the numerical solution of ODEs. I've sent it off to a few
Hello,
I got that on two different machines with 6.4.beta5:
Error building Sage.
The following package(s) may have failed to build:
package: python-2.7.8
Does anybody else meet the same problem ?
I have not yet used the heavy option make distclean, because I hate to
recompile ATLAS
Error installing package python-2.7.8
Le dimanche 12 octobre 2014 20:47:02 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
Hello,
I got that on two different machines with 6.4.beta5:
Error building Sage
Hello,
it seems that the bots have disappeared. Both the buildbot (was top left)
and the patchbot (top right).
The patchbot links are broken (used to be colored little round things).
And http://patchbot.sagemath.org points to William's homepage.
Can we we hope that the bots will be back soon
Probably one should keep *closed_interval* as an alias of *interval*
I also noticed today that *interval_iterator* forgets about trivial
intervals [v,v].
Le mercredi 5 novembre 2014 12:17:10 UTC+1, Jori Mantysalo a écrit :
What is the logic having both interval() and closed_interval() defined
, R. Andrew Ohana andrew...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
The buildbot was having some issues and was reporting everything as a
failure. I disabled it until I get a moment to fix it.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Frédéric Chapoton fchap...@gmail.com
javascript:
wrote
Hello everybody,
Once again the patchbot blobs have disappeared from the trac website. It
seems to happen after every new beta release. What's happening behind the
scene ?
Frederic
Le mercredi 19 novembre 2014 10:04:34 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
Hello,
the patchbot seems
I have the same problem with #16630. I was afraid that I did something
wrong.
Le samedi 14 février 2015 22:45:23 UTC+1, Marc Mezzarobba a écrit :
Hi,
Here's what I get when trying to comment on #17194:
Oops…
Trac detected an internal error:
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or
Hello,
And it fact, something like Butcher series is also waiting in ticket #15635
This depends of course on #11529, which is currently blocked by
ticket #10194
I have tried to work on #10194, but the author has not answered my
questions so far.
If somebody in his university could ask him
Salut, pour moi
sage: polytopes.n_simplex(3).show() et polytopes.n_simplex(4).show()
ouvrent Jmol. Sage version 6.5.rc1, ubuntu.
Le mercredi 11 février 2015 11:41:44 UTC+1, Nathann Cohen a écrit :
Hello everybody,
Could you please check what the following command does on your computer ?
that did the spam filtering, and it is
urgent. See also http://ahbl.org/node
On Thursday, January 8, 2015 9:20:30 AM UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
I will investigate what happens locally. For information, here is the
report
X-Spam-Report: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?
* 2.7
REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC?=
Le mercredi 7 janvier 2015 19:19:19 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
Since yesterday, the trac messages are classified as spam by my mail
server. Maybe there is something that has gone wrong ?
Does anybody else see the same thing ?
--
You
Since yesterday, the trac messages are classified as spam by my mail
server. Maybe there is something that has gone wrong ?
Does anybody else see the same thing ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
*+ 1*
And if possible, let the patchbot work on the base of the latest beta.
Frederic
Le jeudi 19 mars 2015 07:54:05 UTC+1, Ralf Stephan a écrit :
Hello,
this system is still spamming with wrong patchbot results:
6.6.beta5 Ubuntu/14.04/i686/3.13.0-40-generic/arando
1 - 100 of 528 matches
Mail list logo
