is good enough for me, the only
problem was figuring out the url.
Also maybe one could point out how to skip building the documentation.
Denis
On Tuesday, April 9, 2024 at 11:52:23 PM UTC+2 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 10, 2024 at 1:30:21 AM UTC+9 Denis wrote:
>
> At s
is still built by default, it looks more like a bug than a feature. Any
thoughts?
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-deve
So it may be that in the three upgrades that worked the dependency was
satisfied by accident. I can check if it is of any interest now. Thanks for
the help again.
Denis
On Saturday, April 1, 2023 at 6:17:06 PM UTC+2 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> I made a mistake when upgrading a pack
It worked, thank you very much! I am mystified, though.
Denis
On Saturday, April 1, 2023 at 8:55:08 AM UTC+2 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> Try if "./sage -pip install argon2-cffi-bindings" fixes this problem for
> you.
>
> On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 11:46:19 PM UTC-7 Denis w
mended by configure, but that was also the case for 9.7,
so possibly some specific package got updated between the two versions
which broke the installation. I depend on Sage in my daily work so I am
reluctant to try to break the three working systems.
Any ideas?
Cheers,
Denis
--
You recei
Hi,
I am checking whether I should open a ticket. Any comment is welcome.
Cheers,
Denis
save_session() in Sage 9.5 has problems with ETuple variables:
sage: from sage.rings.polynomial.polydict import ETuple
sage: key = ETuple((1,2,3,4))
sage: save_session('data/sessions/example
On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 4:11:05 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> IMHO this is not exposing the server to "open internet", this is
> allowing your client machine (at home), and only it (using "bind
> addess), to access your server --- which, normally speaking, is behind
> a
Hi Markus,
well, that would be the non-paranoic approach, to put it mildly. Generally
speaking, it is against best practices to expose the server of a web
application to the open internet. This is true even for a CMS like Plone, let
alone Jupyter, which is intended for execution of arbitrary
, something like a case study, for those in a similar position. I
would emphasize the security issues in particular, on the other hand I am
not at all sure I have mastered them properly myself, so there would have
to be some serious review if I open a ticket.
Any thoughts welcome,
Denis
--
You
On Thursday, February 20, 2020 at 2:13:23 PM UTC+1, Denis Sunko wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, February 20, 2020 at 2:46:37 AM UTC+1, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> there is nothing wrong with pushing a non-working branch somewhere.
>>> T
things)
>>
>
> Also linking it to the ticket by filling out the branch field there.
>
> Best,
> Travis
>
Did all that, thanks to everyone for the quick replies.
Looking forward to comments on the code,
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribe
Thanks for the encouragement.
I have opened a trac ticket <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29221> now. I
will push the branch as soon as I sort some things out. (I asked for help
with git under sage-combinat-devel, not necessary to repeat here.)
Denis
On Thursday, February 13, 2020 a
rtitions
./.git/refs/heads/fast_vector_partitions
I hesitate to connect this branch with the trac server before figuring out
what is going on. In any case I think I should try the build locally first.
Can anyone please help?
Thanks,
Denis
On Monday, February 10, 2020 at 12:34:40 PM UTC+1, Denis Sunko w
about that - I had read several papers on the subject a while ago and
simply forgot which one I implemented.
I will open a trac ticket ASAP.
Thanks for the advice,
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from
Sorry about that - I had read several papers on the subject some time ago
and forgot which one I implemented.
I will open a trac ticket with this ASAP.
Thanks for the advice,
Denis
On Thursday, February 13, 2020 at 6:08:33 PM UTC+1, Denis wrote:
>
> This is a re-post from sage-combinat
l. Any further advice is welcome.
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view
ficult (or necessary) it would be to address these
points.
Of course, anyone can take it up straight from Er's paper instead, I won't
be jealous:)
Cheers,
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this g
straight from Err's paper instead, I won't
be jealous:)
Cheers,
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-combinat-devel+unsubsc
for their friendly input,
Denis
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Denis <denissu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Bill: your comment about normal/expected behavior covers my initial post,
> but not the fact that the same code works in 7.0 and crashes in 7.3.
>
> So the qu
y I
think that is a system message, i.e. Sage always crashes silently.
Of course, if someone can suggest some way at least to figure out which was
the last function invoked, that would help.
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sa
address and post it here, unless you have a better idea.
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.co
Tried but it didn't work out. MathCloud admins say they can't help. Tried
also at SageCell but the calculation wouldn't end either way after several
hours. Any ideas?
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubs
I tried to reproduce the issue in the cloud, but it cannot do it with the
default settings. Although I can check that my code works, the benchmark
calculation cannot complete because of the limitations of the free account.
To make a realistic comparison I need 4G of RAM and unlimited timeout
Thanks for the idea to post the example on the cloud. I will try to do
that, but can't begin before Sept. 20.
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, sen
As far as I am concerned, development of Sage stopped at 7.0 - I tried 7.3
yesterday, and could not do a mid-level benchmark calculation, which I have
been repeating since at least 6.4. The problem is a memory fault. 7.0 is
the last version with which I can do it. I am prepared to collaborate
Sorry for the stupid question - I did not realize that some old sources are
to be found among the new sources :)
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fro
and cannot afford this factor of 4 in memory use, but
the tarball is not found among the old sources - did someone forget to put
it there?
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Sorry, forgot to mention: all this is happening under Sage 7.0. Under 7.1
it is much worse, I get a silent "Memory exhausted" crash the FIRST time
round, without a report. So it seems something really broke between 7.0 and
7.1.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
think that releasing BIG should then involve a cascade
of releasing the hidden variables.
I wonder if the developers think this is a bug. From the user's point of
view it is certainly strange that one cannot invoke the same function call
twice in a row.
Denis
--
You received this message
The usual command ./sage --optional does not work on MacOSX (I'm using
the pre-compiled version of Sage 6.7)
Using Sage Server http://www.sagemath.org/spkg
HTTP Error 404: Not Found
Error contacting
can take it from here. Note that it is not clear whether any package
compiled after ncurses has a similar problem.
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
31 matches
Mail list logo
