The installation instructions say that ecl is roughly 3 times slower. Once
upon a time, when I was a fricas contributor, it made quite a difference.
But back than, sbcl was a no-go for sage (I forgot why).
I still love fricas' language. I never underrstood why Python succeeded
and Aldor
Maybe one reason to prefer ecl is that it is embeddable, which could allow us
to have a much faster interface than pexpect?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
I'm not sure that fricas *has* to be a package : the current versins (6.4,
6.5beta) already have the fricas interface compiled in :
/usr/local/sage-6.5/src/build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
/usr/local/sage-6.5/src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
Le samedi 6 décembre 2014 19:01:46 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
I'm not sure that fricas *has* to be a package : the current versins (6.4,
6.5beta) already have the fricas interface compiled in :
/usr/local/sage-6.5/src/build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/sage/interfaces/fricas.py
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Emmanuel Charpentier
emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com wrote:
Le samedi 6 décembre 2014 19:01:46 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
I'm not sure that fricas *has* to be a package : the current versins (6.4,
6.5beta) already have the fricas interface compiled
On Saturday, December 6, 2014 11:13:27 AM UTC-8, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
Ahem. I have to retract that : if we want to add an 'algorithm=fricas'
option to sage's integrate(), fricas just *has* to be there as a standard
package.
There is precedent otherwise. For instance
On Saturday, December 6, 2014 9:33:57 AM UTC-8, Martin R wrote:
The installation instructions say that ecl is roughly 3 times slower.
Once upon a time, when I was a fricas contributor, it made quite a
difference. But back than, sbcl was a no-go for sage (I forgot why).
I think it was
