Re: [sage-devel] SageNB -> Jupyter conversion needs testers

2017-04-21 Thread kcrisman
> Let me remind that there are various tickets regarding the > SageNB->Jupyter conversion which need review: > > #22668: HTML widget without description > #22654: Implement %%fortran in Jupyter > #22636: Make the Sage interact library work in Jupyter > > And please anyone who can test the

Re: [sage-devel] SageNB -> Jupyter conversion needs testers

2017-04-19 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Let me remind that there are various tickets regarding the SageNB->Jupyter conversion which need review: #22668: HTML widget without description #22654: Implement %%fortran in Jupyter #22636: Make the Sage interact library work in Jupyter -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [sage-devel] SageNB -> Jupyter conversion needs testers

2017-02-27 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2017-02-26 16:52, John Cremona wrote: @ cells with %gp and %magma were not recognised as being different. I could put %magma followed by a magma command on the same line, but it was useful to put %magma just once at the top of a cell and have the whole cell interpreted using magma. Right.

Re: [sage-devel] SageNB -> Jupyter conversion needs testers

2017-02-26 Thread John Cremona
I was never a big user of the old notebooks but I had several lying around. This conversion worked pretty well for me. The only things I noticed were the following (which are maybe known): @ macros such as \QQ and \ZZ in (mathjax) text blocks were not recognised. The Sage notebook must have

[sage-devel] SageNB -> Jupyter conversion needs testers

2017-02-24 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Hello, At https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22433 there is a ticket implementing a move from SageNB towards Jupyter. It does conversion of SageNB notebooks to Jupyter, hopefully with little loss of functionality (but I know it's not 100% perfect and it never will be). If you are currently