Re: [sage-devel] Should we consider an unmaintained upstream package as upstream?

2015-01-15 Thread mmarco
The imput that the library takes is basically the oriented Gauss code (slightly modified). Converting from the format that we use for the oriented Gauss code is straightforward. El jueves, 15 de enero de 2015, 14:17:02 (UTC+1), Amit Jamadagni escribió: Hello Miguel, I have few

[sage-devel] Should we consider an unmaintained upstream package as upstream?

2015-01-15 Thread mmarco
I have been working on patching a program that computes the homfly polynomial of knots and links, in order to use it as a shared library. I would like to include it as an optional sage package in the mid term, so we could use it in the knot theory module that is being worked on (by the way,

Re: [sage-devel] Should we consider an unmaintained upstream package as upstream?

2015-01-15 Thread Amit Jamadagni
Hello Miguel, I have few queries, not related to the questions though : 1. I have read through the readme and as I understand the input that the package uses is a bit different. So it would be really helpful to know how all of this will fit together with the current input ?? 2. Given, if