I tried to build Sage using Sun's compiler suite, based on Sun Studio 12
update 1. This is of course good for Solaris, but will also find other
issues. Since the Sun compiler is a lot stricter than the GNU one, it
will find bad code.
The version of sqlite in Sage (3.5.3) is the first package
Hi folks,
Sage 4.1.1 compilation aborted after an error trying to compile the
spkg sage-4.1.1.spkg. Here's a relevant snippet:
Host system
uname -a:
SunOS t2 5.10 Generic_141414-02 sun4v sparc SUNW,T5240 Solaris
Are
polybori-0-6-3.4.patch
polybori-0-6-3.5.patch
included in that spkg file? The patches were added after the link to the
.spkg file was posted.
These are revisions of the same patch. These are patches against the main Sage
tree and thus not included in the SPKG.
Cheers,
Martin
--
I've marked
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6177
that as '[with patch; needs work]' as it breaks on Solaris. There were
previous issues on Solaris with PolyBoRi which were resolved. With the
updated .spkg, those issues return. Basically if the Sun C++ compiler
(CC) can be found,
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
Sage 4.1.1 compilation aborted after an error trying to compile the
spkg sage-4.1.1.spkg. Here's a relevant snippet:
Host system
uname -a:
SunOS t2 5.10 Generic_141414-02 sun4v sparc SUNW,T5240 Solaris
I tried to build Sage 4.1.1 with Sun's compiler suite (Sun Studio 12
update 1 to be precise).
The Sun compilers are more fussy than gcc, and will reject code that gcc
accepts. One such big of code is below.
void
gcry_md_hash_buffer (int algo, void *digest,
const void
Hi sage-devel,
Prompted by William's message, I have spent some quality time
compiling a list of referee requests so we can get some of the waiting
patches on their way. Below is a list of names with ticket numbers.
I will send individual emails saying pretty please tomorrow morning.
Note that
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Alex Ghitzaaghi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi sage-devel,
Prompted by William's message, I have spent some quality time
compiling a list of referee requests so we can get some of the waiting
patches on their way. Below is a list of names with ticket numbers.
I
Hi folks,
The source of Sage 4.1.1 has been mirrored out. Now is the time to
polish up the release tour and showcase features in 4.1.1. I have
created a general structure of the release tour at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-4.1.1
with tickets that I think are good for a release tour. But if
Well chosen -- you put me down for three, of which I was already
reviewing one! (6672).
Is there a way of asking trac to list all open tickets which I have
commented on, or have uploaded a patch to? I have a feeling that
there are some not-yet-reviewed parches by me out there, but cannot
Hi folks,
FYI: Looks like NetworkX 1.0 is about to be released soon.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
-- Forwarded message --
From: Aric Hagberg ahagb...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:51 AM
Subject: [networkx-discuss] Recent posts NetworkX 1.0 release candidate
To:
Hi Minh,
On Aug 16, 4:15 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
The source of Sage 4.1.1 has been mirrored out. Now is the time to
polish up the release tour and showcase features in 4.1.1. I have
created a general structure of the release tour at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-4.1.1
On Aug 16, 5:03 pm, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
...
Would you mind if I describe my (optional) group cohomology package in
the release tour? It was merged in 4.1.1.rc1
Oops, I missed the fact that you already listed it on the Wiki page.
Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Simon
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Simon Kingsimon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Hi Minh,
On Aug 16, 4:15 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
The source of Sage 4.1.1 has been mirrored out. Now is the time to
polish up the release tour and showcase features in 4.1.1. I have
Hi John,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:16 AM, John Cremonajohn.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Well chosen -- you put me down for three, of which I was already
reviewing one! (6672).
Is there a way of asking trac to list all open tickets which I have
commented on, or have uploaded a patch to? I
David,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 8:06 AM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Are these in addition? I'm not an expert in graph theory anyway,
which most of the ones you listed are about.
I can take #6679, #6680 from your list if you like.
--
Robert L. Miller
http://www.rlmiller.org/
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Alex Ghitzaaghi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi sage-devel,
Prompted by William's message, I have spent some quality time
compiling a list of referee requests so we can get some of the waiting
patches on their way. Below is a list of names with ticket
Hi Minh,
On Aug 16, 5:11 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have put your optional package under the section Packages as
ticket #6491. By all means, please do so. It's better if people read
about your work from your own description than to read about it from
me. I have no idea
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Simon Kingsimon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Hi Minh,
On Aug 16, 5:11 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have put your optional package under the section Packages as
ticket #6491. By all means, please do so. It's better if people read
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Robert Millerrlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 8:06 AM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Are these in addition? I'm not an expert in graph theory anyway,
which most of the ones you listed are about.
I can take #6679, #6680
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:06 AM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Alex Ghitzaaghi...@gmail.com wrote:
...
David Joyner: #6685, #6679, #6680, #6572
I already volunteered for
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6447
I'm doing
Hmmm There are two cliquer-related patches in this list, so I
guess I should do something about it... Now I am not sure I understood
all of what you said : a showcase description is a description with
examples of the new features brought to sage by the closed patches,
isn't it ?
If it is the
Hi Nathann,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Nathann Cohennathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm There are two cliquer-related patches in this list, so I
guess I should do something about it... Now I am not sure I understood
all of what you said : a showcase description is a description
On 15 Aug, 21:30, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
I am pleased to learn that deficiencies in gmpy are not inherited by
Sage, and that
MPIR, equivalent functionally to GMP is accessible more directly.
It doesn't seem that it should be a point of pride that there are 5000
lines in Sage that
Dear David,
Sorry for mixing this up. The (imperfect) train of thought was that
the person who reviews the GLPK spkg is in a good position to also
look at the two tickets with applications.
I'm glad you and Robert sorted this out, and many thanks for
volunteering to do those reviews.
Best,
On Aug 16, 3:30 pm, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
..snip...
{RJF] (mpfr::with-temps (/(- (* (- (* 2 i)1) x t1) (* (- i 1) t0)) i)))
That's a very interesting example. Are you saying that Lisp
automatically divines which MPFR functions to assign to those
operators?
no,
On 17 Aug, 02:28, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 16, 3:30 pm, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
..snip...
{RJF] (mpfr::with-temps (/(- (* (- (* 2 i)1) x t1) (* (- i 1) t0)) i)))
That's a very interesting example. Are you saying that Lisp
automatically divines
I should point out that the vast majority of Sage files do not have
mpz_add in them The below are merely the ones that do.
Bill.
On 17 Aug, 04:04, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just to put this 5000 lines in context, here are counts of the number
of occurrences of mpz_add in
Just to put this 5000 lines in context, here are counts of the number
of occurrences of mpz_add in all the Cython and Python files in Sage:
/sage/modular/modsym/heilbronn.pyx:1
/sage/ext/multi_modular.pyx:2
/sage/combinat/expnums.pyx:1
/sage/modules/vector_integer_dense.pyx:2
First of all, I am confused about Python and macros. If I read this
posting from March, 2009,
Python doesn't have macros.
http://blog.pythonisito.com/2009/03/python-macros.html
So maybe this guy is misinformed?
...snip...
Right, but you could write a similar macro in python. {Scratches
30 matches
Mail list logo
