Re: [sage-devel] Conda package for Sage

Hi Erik, Here's a issue to track the packages in conda-forge, https://github.co m/conda-forge/staged-recipes/issues/2357 Conda-forge is a community effort to distribute conda packages. What's better than Continuum's own conda packages is that these packages are much more up-to-date and the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

Hi Harald, Thanks for yelling out. I've added the polynomial class project that I mentioned on the list earlier. But 1 project is surely not enough... Best, Johan Harald Schilly writes: > Hello, in 3 days is the deadline regarding the project application. > I'm working on the application

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

Hello, in 3 days is the deadline regarding the project application. I'm working on the application itself, but a list of suggested projects is *vital* to getting approval. I saw a few ideas here, but so far not a single proposal was added to https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2017 Please compare it

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Organisation of online : survey of developers

Am 2017-02-05 um 03:22 schrieb kcrisman: > > "Tutorial", "Thematic Tutorial", "PREP Tutorial", "A Tour of Sage". and > "Constructions" are mostly the same Tutorial. > > > Just for clarification, these are massively and completely different > documents. > There is also a lot of

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Organisation of online : survey of developers

> Exactly. I wouldn't like to have documentation that is *not* included in the > SageMath sources. Currently, one can access all documentation locally, during > a > SageMath session. +1 Most of the Feature Tour pages http://www.sagemath.org/tour.html are not in the source tree. They are also

[sage-devel] Re: Organisation of online : survey of developers

Hi! On 2017-02-06, Clemens Heuberger wrote: > Am 2017-02-05 um 03:22 schrieb kcrisman: >> >> "Tutorial", "Thematic Tutorial", "PREP Tutorial", "A Tour of Sage". and >> "Constructions" are mostly the same Tutorial. >> >> >> Just for clarification, these are

[sage-devel] root @ sagemath node

Hi guys, who do I discreetly share the bug I found on linux server ? I got the root .. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] root @ sagemath node

Email me: wst...@gmail.com On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:04 PM martin i wrote: > Hi guys, > who do I discreetly share the bug I found on linux server ? I got the root > .. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel"

[sage-devel] cc1 killed in iMac

Just for fun I tried to compile SageMath on an old iMac with 1 GB RAM and 2 x T7400 Intel Core 2. It stops when compiling m4rie, see http://www.sis.uta.fi/~jm58660/m4rie-20150908.txt for a full log. Error message is gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) I report this, as it

Re: [sage-devel] cc1 killed in iMac

Output of cat /proc/cpuinfo please. > On 7/02/2017, at 19:58, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > > Just for fun I tried to compile SageMath on an old iMac with 1 GB RAM and 2 x > T7400 Intel Core 2. > > It stops when compiling m4rie, see >

Re: [sage-devel] Organisation of online : survey of developers

What I think Mr. Rennekamp's answer shows beyond dispute is that someone who is well-intentioned and motivated still finds it difficult to sift through the vast archipelago - and it is a real cluster of islands, some closer together than others - of Sage documentation. (We haven't even

[sage-devel] Re: Organisation of online : survey of developers

Hi Johan, On 2017-02-06, Johan S H Rosenkilde wrote: > Under the Documentation main page doc.sagemath.org, the "guided tour" is > called "tutorial". And it is listed after "Thematic Tutorial" though it > should surely be visited first by a newcomer. And shouldn't it rather

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Organisation of online : survey of developers

I'm neither a developer (except indirectly, I suppose, via fixes to Maxima) nor a Sage user nor, for that matter, a fan of Python. (I don't object to it, just don't use it). Nevertheless, I'll throw my $0.02 in here. Why not have a top-level menu that leads to introduction to Sage for high

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2017 kickoff

I can add (and volunteer to mentor) a project to develop an implementation of graph modular decomposition (which is very broken in Sage, and no 3rd party implementations are suitable for interfacing) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel"

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Organisation of online : survey of developers

+1 Rosenkilde. If the tutorials really are different from each other, then they should be to the point when introducing which one to read. I also outlined my specific idea for www.sagemath.org in my second post. +1 King. Though it isn't "removing documentation", it is pointing users to 1) how

[sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 4:27:02 AM UTC-8, Isuru Fernando wrote: > > > Anybody interested in making proper conda packages for the remaining 74 > packages and sage itself? > People interested in this effort may want to look at: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21507 Task ticket: Make

[sage-devel] Re: Organisation of online : survey of developers

Well, the topic went to documentation very quickly. I think we've all decided that documentation in the source code generally shouldn't be messed with. To exend the statement, we have decided that we should make our directions to new users clearer. If that's all you read, then we should

Re: [sage-devel] Conda package for Sage

On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Isuru Fernando wrote: > I've packaged sage 7.5.1 for conda for linux and have uploaded it to > anaconda.org. > > To try it out you can do on linux with miniconda3, (Downloads about 1 GB) > > conda create -n sage sage sage-spkg-sources -c