Because we do not have a clean command inside sage to launch the jupyter
noteboook.
For the moment, we should just try to avoid new people start using the
deprecated sagenb.
F
Le lundi 29 octobre 2018 23:51:22 UTC+1, Simon King a écrit :
>
> Hi Frédéric,
>
> On 2018-10-29, Frédéric Chapoton
Hi,
I had the same problem this morning, while performing the python3 build of
Sage 8.5.beta1:
[sagenb-1.1.0] Error installing package sagenb-1.1.0
The command was
MAKE="make -j8" make build
Running it a second time lead to a successful build though...
Eric.
--
You received this message
On 2018-10-30 13:47, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
> I had the same problem this morning, while performing the python3 build
> of Sage 8.5.beta1:
> [sagenb-1.1.0] Error installing package sagenb-1.1.0
> The command was
> MAKE="make -j8" make build
> Running it a second time lead to a successful build
If you insist of building sagenb on python3 (where it's broken)
then one should not build its docs there
(docbuilding of sagenb on python3 is known to be broken)
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:35 PM Daniel Krenn wrote:
>
> On 2018-10-30 13:47, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
> > I had the same problem this
On 2018-10-30 14:44, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> If you insist of building sagenb on python3 (where it's broken)
> then one should not build its docs there
> (docbuilding of sagenb on python3 is known to be broken)
I do not need sagenb nor docs at all. I simply want a SageMath on
Python3 to see the
Just add
exit 0
at the 1st line of build/pkgs/sagenb/spkg-install
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:57 PM Daniel Krenn wrote:
>
> On 2018-10-30 14:44, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > If you insist of building sagenb on python3 (where it's broken)
> > then one should not build its docs there
> >
I just had the same issue. Why do you think "several versions of gfortran
guts" are the issue? How does sage find gfortran / why does it get confused?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 4:01 PM Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>
> I just had the same issue. Why do you think "several versions of gfortran
> guts" are the issue? How does sage find gfortran / why does it get confused?
>
What's the OS you are using? How do you install Sage?
I suspect it's a conflict
I tried to build Sage with Python3 via
make configure
./configure --with-python=3
make build
(fresh clone of 8.5.beta1)
as announced on https://wiki.sagemath.org/Python3-compatible%20code
but it failed building its docs. From what I read, building the docs
does still not work (part of the log
solved at
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26593
Le 26/10/2018 à 16:48, 'Paul Mercat' via sage-devel a écrit :
Thank you. So the bug is with the test of equality in QQbar, not with
NumberField.
Do you know how to solve this problem with QQbar ?
I tried to look at where is the error, and it
IMHO sagenb should not be installed with python 3 at all.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:47 PM Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I had the same problem this morning, while performing the python3 build of
> Sage 8.5.beta1:
> [sagenb-1.1.0] Error installing package sagenb-1.1.0
> The command was
>
On Monday, October 29, 2018 at 9:36:33 PM UTC-7, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>
> Or run 'make distclean' before switching Python versions.
>>
>
> For me, "make distclean" did not work.
>
What didn't work about it? "make distclean" followed by "./configure
--with-python=3" and then "make" works for me.
Good thing you made me check. I didn't actually include gfortran into the
build environment, so its saying `checking for gfortran... no`.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 4:48 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Well, does ./configure outputs something like
>
> .
> gcc-7.2.0 not installed (configure
Its a bit of a complicated case, but I'm not using anaconda. I'm using
nixos and a special build environment that uses linux namespaces to make
sure all the dependencies are in the location sage expects them. I'm using
that to build sage-the-distribution when testing because that won't build
No, but nixos doesn't follow FHS[0], so I am using linux namespaces (more
precisely this[1]) to build sage in an environment where all the build
dependencies are at their FHS locations. So sage is using nixos's gfortran,
the namespaces are just so it can find it where it expects it. This worked
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 4:29 PM Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>
> Its a bit of a complicated case, but I'm not using anaconda. I'm using nixos
> and a special build environment that uses linux namespaces to make sure all
> the dependencies are in the location sage expects them. I'm using that to
>
Well, does ./configure outputs something like
.
gcc-7.2.0 not installed (configure check)
gdb-8.2
gf2x-1.2.p0
gfan-0.6.2.p0
gfortran-7.2.0 not installed (configure check)
...
If so it should not build gfortran (unless you have SAGE_INSTALL_GCC
set to yes for some
Do _l_action_ and _r_action_ actually work?
We have the following occurrences:
dakrenn@nops:~$ sage -grep "_l_action_"
sage/rings/multi_power_series_ring_element.py:#return
self._l_action_(c)
sage/rings/multi_power_series_ring_element.py:def _l_action_(self, c):
Hi Daniel,
On 2018-10-30, Daniel Krenn wrote:
> Do _l_action_ and _r_action_ actually work?
I've already used that kind of methods in the past.
Best regards,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
I just need to use the library from my C code in included in sage.
Is it necessary to write an interface for that ?
Le mercredi 31 octobre 2018 00:25:34 UTC+1, Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx)
a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 04:18:16PM -0700, 'Paul Mercat' via sage-devel
> wrote:
On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 2:34:59 AM UTC+9, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, October 29, 2018 at 9:36:33 PM UTC-7, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>>
>> Or run 'make distclean' before switching Python versions.
>>>
>>
>> For me, "make distclean" did not work.
>>
>
> What didn't work about
Hi !
I'm using the Graphviz librairy to draw graph in the tools that I'm
currently developping for sage,
because it produces much better pictures than the default tool of Sage.
But I use the program "dot" that I installed on my computer.
If I'm not mistaken, Graphviz is partially included in
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 04:49:16PM -0700, 'Paul Mercat' via sage-devel wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I'm using the Graphviz librairy to draw graph in the tools that I'm
> currently developping for sage,
> because it produces much better pictures than the default tool of Sage.
> But I use the program
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 04:18:16PM -0700, 'Paul Mercat' via sage-devel wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I'm currently working on things in sage that uses the librairy SDL2.
> This librairy is not part of sage if I'm not mistaken, but it is really
> usefull to draw efficiently and interact with the user.
>
Hi !
I'm currently working on things in sage that uses the librairy SDL2.
This librairy is not part of sage if I'm not mistaken, but it is really
usefull to draw efficiently and interact with the user.
It's a low level and not too big C librairy, with a licence compatible with
sage if I'm not
Hello everyone:
It has become necessary to lean on Magma's extensive ability to compute
with lattices (and in particular with ideal classes in definite quaternion
algebras).
I am trying to write some code in Magma (granting that this is an
abomination) and for the life of me, I cannot
26 matches
Mail list logo
