On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 6:50 AM, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really need to go to sleep so I won't do a top-ten, but here's a top
2:
Thanks for reminding me this. It seems that people really like
Mathematica, so when I graudate, I'll try to learn it and do something
in it, so that I
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:37 PM, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used to really enjoy writing programs in mathematica, but maybe I'm
a strange person. I only stopped in order to force myself to get
fluent with Sage. I think it just depends on your background, what
you are used to, and
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:37 PM, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used to really enjoy writing programs in mathematica, but maybe I'm
a strange person. I only stopped in order to force myself to get
fluent with
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:50 AM, mhampton wrote:
I really need to go to sleep so I won't do a top-ten, but here's a
top 2:
1) Powerful substitutions and rules. Sage does not have anything
comparable. The .subs() function is buggy even in its limited
domain. There have been previous
On Aug 21, 2008, at 8:08 AM, Bill Page wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:50 AM, mhampton wrote:
I really need to go to sleep so I won't do a top-ten, but here's a
top 2:
1) Powerful substitutions and rules. Sage does not have anything
comparable. The .subs() function is buggy even in
On Aug 21, 9:08 am, Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps Sage can implement some form of pattern matching and
subsitution such is done by Axiom's rewrite rules? I think that in
many respects these provide a functionality similar to Mathematica.
There is also a similar re-writing
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but
programming in Mathematica is not fun.
And that would be the understatement of the week.
Cheers,
f
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
I used to really enjoy writing programs in mathematica, but maybe I'm
a strange person. I only stopped in order to force myself to get
fluent with Sage. I think it just depends on your background, what
you are used to, and what you want to do. For symbolic calculations
and programming I still
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:37 PM, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used to really enjoy writing programs in mathematica, but maybe I'm
a strange person. I only stopped in order to force myself to get
fluent with Sage. I think it just depends on your background, what
you are used to, and
I really need to go to sleep so I won't do a top-ten, but here's a top
2:
1) Powerful substitutions and rules. Sage does not have anything
comparable. The .subs() function is buggy even in its limited
domain. There have been previous posts on sage-devel that give good
examples of this.
2)
I would be glad (with your permission) to post this question and my
reply on-list somewhere - sage-devel if you prefer.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi Bill,
since you know both Python and Aldor or Axiom and now you know
Sage quite a bit, do you think Aldor or the
Hi Bill,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, certainly I think Axiom domains are viable. Another way of asking
this question is: if static strongly typed language with first-order
polymorphic dependent types is viable? I think this has been answered
in
12 matches
Mail list logo
