[sage-gsoc] Re: Introduction: Rajesh Veeranki [Matroid Theory]

2014-02-25 Thread Stefan van Zwam
Hi Rajesh, Welcome! Good to see you getting started with Sage development. What textbook do you use for your course? That could help pointing you in the right direction. For the automorphism group, the way to go is to construct an appropriate graph (e.g. a bipartite one with the elements on on

[sage-gsoc] Re: Matroid Theory

2014-03-02 Thread Stefan van Zwam
Hi Stephen, Have you looked at the list of potential projects we provided? Which ones sound interesting to you? --Stefan van Zwam. On Friday, February 28, 2014 6:59:14 PM UTC-5, Stephen Long wrote: > > Hello, I am an undergraduate Computer Engineering Major with some > experience i

[sage-gsoc] Re: Introduction as a GSoC aspirant

2014-03-05 Thread Stefan van Zwam
Hi Shubham, One thing you could do, which goes for any of our projects, is to familiarize yourself with Sage's development process. Get and compile the development version, find an easy ticket which you can review, and take an easy open ticket and work on it. What in particular attracts you to

[sage-gsoc] Re: Introduction

2015-02-20 Thread Stefan van Zwam
Hi Ramchandran, There is a list of currently open tickets regarding matroid theory code here: http://trac.sagemath.org/query?status=!closed&component=matroid+theory If those tickets are too much, you can pick a beginner's ticket instead: http://trac.sagemath.org/query?status=needs_info&status=

[sage-gsoc] Re: Interested in working on connectivity algorithms for matroids

2015-03-09 Thread Stefan van Zwam
binatorial Optimization is a good reference. How much do you know about matroids? Cheers, Stefan van Zwam. On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 2:39:49 PM UTC-6, Chao Xu wrote: > > Hi all! > > I'm Chao Xu, a computer science PhD student at UIUC. > - I had experience with Sage a few

[sage-gsoc] Re: Interested in working on connectivity algorithms for matroids

2015-03-17 Thread Stefan van Zwam
, >> >> Thanks for the reply. I know the definitions for many matroid concepts >> and its applications. >> For example, I have no problem reading the chapter on matroid in >> Schrijver's book. >> I don't have background with the deeper theories. >>

Re: [sage-gsoc] Re: Interested in working on connectivity algorithms for matroids

2015-03-20 Thread Stefan van Zwam
tation of connectivity > algorithms might take longer than expected. Rajan’s algorithm is described > for representable matroids, and I would need to figure out if it is still > fast if it only have access to independence oracle. There is a large amount > of time allocated for useful exa

[sage-gsoc] Re: Matroid Theory; Topology topics for GSoC

2015-03-20 Thread Stefan van Zwam
Hi Islam, Realistically, I can't mentor more than one person on the matroid theory project. If you want to compete on that front, write the best proposal you can, and don't worry about overlap. However, be advised that I would probably prefer a graduate-level student on this particular project,

[sage-gsoc] Re: want to work with sage for gsoc 2016

2015-11-06 Thread Stefan van Zwam
Dear Pankaj, Welcome! The Google Summer of Code program won't be active until some time next year (keep an eye on google-melange.com). Until then, you can get started by picking a project to work on (a ticket on the SageMath trac server for Sage; I don't know where lmnd does their development)

[sage-gsoc] Re: [sage-gsoc-mentors] SageMath has been accepted as an GSoC 2016 mentor org

2016-02-29 Thread Stefan van Zwam
Hi Harald, I don’t see anywhere for mentors to sign up, but I will make myself available again this year. Cheers, Stefan. > On Feb 29, 2016, at 2:39 PM, Harald Schilly wrote: > > Hi, just a quick note to everyone: SageMath has yet again been > accepted as a mentoring organization for this

[sage-gsoc] Re: SageMath has been accepted as an GSoC 2016 mentor org

2016-02-29 Thread Stefan van Zwam
Also: yay! A huge thanks to you and the other admins for putting in all the work to get this off the ground! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-gsoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-g

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC 2016: Regression Test Framework and Extending Matroid Theory Functionality

2016-03-21 Thread Stefan van Zwam
Hi Nikhil, I don't see a fundamental problem working with two mentors, but you'll need to have a very good reason to propose such a thing. I think proposals are stronger if they propose to do only one thing, and go in more depth for that thing. As for the matroid project: I feel this year's id

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC 2017 accepted SageMath

2017-04-04 Thread Stefan van Zwam
Be aware that this is not the mentor list, but the public list. Please don't discuss content of the submitted proposals here. -- Stefan On Tuesday, April 4, 2017 at 6:25:45 AM UTC-5, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > Thanks Harald. > I did not realize so many of them were for my project. > I only s

Re: [sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC 2018 Project : Redesigning the polynomial class hierarchy and linking with libraries

2018-02-28 Thread Stefan van Zwam
Until that time, you can familiarize yourself with SageMath development, and start writing your proposal. Note that the "ideas page" only has suggestions for things you might work on, it is up to you to write a proposal. Also, we can't select everyone who applies. On Tuesday, February 27, 2018

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSOC '18 proposal re: SOS/SDP

2018-04-09 Thread Stefan van Zwam
Dear Reese, It is against GSoC rules to comment on student acceptance before Google announces who's in and who's out. According to the Summer of Code timeline, this announcement will happen on April 23. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-gso