On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 at 10:30:39 AM UTC+8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> I'm getting this silly error while installing pillow:
>
> Copying package files from temporary location
> /home/scratch2/dimpase/sage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/pillow-5.3.0.p0/inst
>
>
> to /home/scratch2/dimpase/s
I'm getting this silly error while installing pillow:
Copying package files from temporary location
/home/scratch2/dimpase/sage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/pillow-5.3.0.p0/inst
to /home/scratch2/dimpase/sage/sage/local
cp: cannot overwrite non-directory
'/home/scratch2/dimpase/sage/sage/local/./
On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 8:59:06 PM UTC-4, Simon King wrote:
>
> On 2020-03-31, Matthias Köppe > wrote:
> > On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 8:30:34 PM UTC-4, Simon King wrote:
> >>
> >> I installed python3 after "sudo add-apt-repository ppa:deadsnakes/ppa".
> >> Has that been a mistake?
> >>
Dear Matthias,
On 2020-03-31, Matthias Köppe wrote:
> On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 8:30:34 PM UTC-4, Simon King wrote:
>>
>> > Are you sure your /usr/bin/python comes from that distribution? As far
>> as I
>> > can see, xenial only has 3.5.1-3.
>>
>> I installed python3 after "sudo add-apt-rep
On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 8:30:34 PM UTC-4, Simon King wrote:
>
> > Are you sure your /usr/bin/python comes from that distribution? As far
> as I
> > can see, xenial only has 3.5.1-3.
>
> I installed python3 after "sudo add-apt-repository ppa:deadsnakes/ppa".
> Has that been a mistake?
>
>
On 2020-03-30, Matthias Köppe wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 6:45:17 PM UTC-4, Simon King wrote:
>> Concerning too old:
>> $ uname -a
>> Linux klap 4.15.0-91-generic #92~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 28 14:57:22
>> UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>> $ cat /etc/issue
On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 6:59:30 PM UTC-4, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> I see the same in the log file for the Python 2 build. I wonder if this
> has to do with upgrading Xcode, which I seem to have done 6 days ago. To be
> clear, yesterday and today I have built 9.1.beta8 + Python 3 and 9.1.b
> On Mar 29, 2020, at 05:59 , Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
Built from a fresh clone of 9.1.beta9, on two macOS sy
On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 7:16:26 PM UTC-4, Matthias Köppe wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 6:45:17 PM UTC-4, Simon King wrote:
>>
>> Trying what src/doc/en/installation/debian*.txt tells me:
>> Note, selecting 'zlib1g-dev' instead of 'libz-dev'
>> E: Unable to locate pack
Hi Simon,
On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 6:45:17 PM UTC-4, Simon King wrote:
>
> Trying what src/doc/en/installation/debian*.txt tells me:
> Note, selecting 'zlib1g-dev' instead of 'libz-dev'
> E: Unable to locate package libflint-arb-dev
> E: Unable to locate package libplanarity-dev
> E: Unabl
I see the same in the log file for the Python 2 build. I wonder if this has
to do with upgrading Xcode, which I seem to have done 6 days ago. To be
clear, yesterday and today I have built 9.1.beta8 + Python 3 and 9.1.beta9
+ Python 2, both successfully, despite this crash. It's 9.1.beta9 + Pyth
Hi Matthias,
On 2020-03-30, Matthias Köppe wrote:
> This is outdated. We now generate an up-to-date version of this manual
> section at boostrapping time. Use "cat src/doc/en/installation/debian*.txt"
> to print it.
>
> Or re-run configure and take a look at the system package installation
> h
On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 5:54:19 PM UTC-4, Steven Trogdon wrote:
>
> *Gentoo [...]*
>
>>
>>
Please help with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29105 so that builds on
top of Gentoo can be properly tested.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-rel
Hi Simon,
On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 6:20:24 PM UTC-4, Simon King wrote:
>
> Let me add further disappointments:
>
> After making sure that python3.7.7 is installed on my laptop and after
> installing the recommended system packages mentioned in
>
> http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installatio
Hi!
On 2020-03-30, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2020, 03:03 Vincent Delecroix, <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Le 29/03/2020 à 21:50, Matthias Köppe a écrit :
>> >
>> > Let me remark that this is the first beta that tries to use the system
>> > python3 in a venv (#27824) instead
*Gentoo*
Incremental build 9.1.beta8 -> 9.1.beta9
After make python3-clean && make I have the following failures:
--
sage -t --long --warn-long 115.0 src/sage/doctest/test.py # 1 doctest
failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 115.0
>From your config.log ... rather suspicious:
configure:10189: g++ -std=gnu++11 -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.cpp -lgmp -lm
>&5
configure:10189: $? = 0
configure:10206: result: -lgmp
configure:10231: will use system package and not install SPKG mpir
configure:10265: checking absolute name of
co
I ran "brew upgrade" and it only upgraded a few packages: tox, cmake,
boost, automake, and some port of emacs. I rebuilt Sage and it didn't help.
(Just to be sure, I also built 9.1.beta8, and that one passes tests.)
On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 9:30:26 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> I vagu
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020, 03:03 Vincent Delecroix, <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> Le 29/03/2020 à 21:50, Matthias Köppe a écrit :
> >
> > Let me remark that this is the first beta that tries to use the system
> > python3 in a venv (#27824) instead of building our own copy of python3.
> > Test
Le 29/03/2020 à 21:50, Matthias Köppe a écrit :
Let me remark that this is the first beta that tries to use the system
python3 in a venv (#27824) instead of building our own copy of python3.
Tests of building from scratch or (after "make python3-clean") would be
valuable.
Very disappointing
On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 12:23:00 PM UTC-4, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> I should also mention that I have built every beta from scratch for Python
> 2 and 3 for quite a while, and these failures are new. So if the gcc in
> homebrew is getting picked up, it's because of some new change in Sage.
I vaguely recall seeing similar errors on Homebrew, they were due to
stale Homebrew. Could you try updating it?
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:23 AM John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> I should also mention that I have built every beta from scratch for Python 2
> and 3 for quite a while, and these failures a
I should also mention that I have built every beta from scratch for Python
2 and 3 for quite a while, and these failures are new. So if the gcc in
homebrew is getting picked up, it's because of some new change in Sage.
On Sunday, March 29, 2020 at 10:01:31 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Co
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:14 PM Thierry
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:04:46PM +0800, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 21:47, Thierry
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 12:50:18PM -0700, Matthias Köppe wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, March 29, 2020 at 8
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:04:46PM +0800, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 21:47, Thierry
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 12:50:18PM -0700, Matthias Köppe wrote:
> > > On Sunday, March 29, 2020 at 8:59:43 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As always, yo
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 21:47, Thierry
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 12:50:18PM -0700, Matthias Köppe wrote:
> > On Sunday, March 29, 2020 at 8:59:43 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote:
> > >
> > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> > > branch. Alternative
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 12:50:18PM -0700, Matthias Köppe wrote:
> On Sunday, March 29, 2020 at 8:59:43 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote:
> >
> > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> > http://www
On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 1:49:28 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 1:12 PM Matthias Köppe > wrote:
> >
> > By the way, current homebrew does not seem to have Python 3.7.x.
> really?
> https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/master/Formula/python.rb
> still
Volker Braun wrote:
> I don't see any major issues for 9.1 any more, so we should soon have
> the first rc. If you have anything that you thing should go in then
> now is the time to finish it up ;-)
I'd really like #28517 to go in, because it fixes some serious issues
reported by a user attempti
29 matches
Mail list logo
