Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-28 Thread Matthias Köppe
I have added this report to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32789 On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 4:44:56 PM UTC-8 Samuel Lelievre wrote: > On Cygwin, build failure on sagemath_doc_html-none, > apparently having something to do with Singular. > > Details: > > >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-27 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
On Cygwin, build failure on sagemath_doc_html-none, apparently having something to do with Singular. Details: https://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/slel-2021-11-27-s95b7-cygwin-fail.zip -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-21 Thread Dima Pasechnik
PS. IM¬HO we just rise a hard error in ./configure if there is no pkg-config On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 6:16 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 6:10 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > Hi William, > > > > please do > > > > brew install pkg-config > > > > and try again. From your

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-21 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 6:10 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Hi William, > > please do > > brew install pkg-config > > and try again. From your log, it appears missing,for some reason, > > configure:6572: checking for pkg-config > configure:6605: result: no > > > and this breaks everything in

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-21 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Hi William, please do brew install pkg-config and try again. From your log, it appears missing,for some reason, configure:6572: checking for pkg-config configure:6605: result: no and this breaks everything in ./configure that relies on it. Yes, for some packages there are workarounds for

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-21 Thread Kenji Iohara
I use Mac OS 12.0.1 on my mac book pro (intel Core i5). >From the first built, I couldn’t compile Sage 9.5.beta6 and beta7, it has some >problems to compile scipy-1.6.3. Up to beta5, I had no problem on the compilation. > 20/11/2021 22:12、'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release > のメール: > > > >>

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-20 Thread Matthias Köppe
On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 1:57:40 PM UTC-8 William Stein wrote: > it would be good to amend this sentence in the README: > > "Sage fully supports all major Linux distributions, recent versions of > macOS, and Windows (using Cygwin, Windows Subsystem for Linux, or > using

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-20 Thread Matthias Köppe
> checking for library containing openblas_get_config... no config.log please On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 3:17:37 PM UTC-8 William Stein wrote: > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 2:23 PM Matthias Köppe > wrote: > > > > On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 1:57:40 PM UTC-8 William Stein wrote: > >>

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-20 Thread Matthias Köppe
On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 1:57:40 PM UTC-8 William Stein wrote: > > So I do "brew install openblas && ./configure && make" to continue onward: > > This fundamentally fails, because the brew installed openblas doesn't > get detected by ./configure, and make results in immediately

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-20 Thread William Stein
Trying to build on an M1 ARM Mac with MacOS 12.x finally gets past the very first package (GMP), due to upgrading to 6.2.1. It fails with gfortran, with an error about this version of macOS being "unreleased" (which is not true, of course -- it is released): [gfortran-10.3.0] checking if mkdir

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-20 Thread 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release
> On Nov 20, 2021, at 12:18 , Matthias Köppe wrote: > > On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 12:10:18 PM UTC-8 jus...@mac.com wrote: > unlike the previous builds, this time there is no log file for the doc > build. > > Is this a change? I did not notice anything in the changeless below that

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-20 Thread Matthias Köppe
On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 12:10:18 PM UTC-8 jus...@mac.com wrote: > unlike the previous builds, this time there is no log file for the doc > build. > > Is this a change? I did not notice anything in the changeless below that > seemed relevant. Yes, it is coming from this change:

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-20 Thread 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release
I just built 9.5-b7 on my 2019 MBP (16” 8-Core Core i9) with macOS 10.15.7. All went well, no build or “ptestlong” problems. However, unlike the previous builds, this time there is no log file for the doc build. Is this a change? I did not notice anything in the changeless below that seemed

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-20 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
2021-11-20 10:25 UTC, Volker Braun: > > cc60cfebc4 (tag: 9.5.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.beta7 Thanks for this new release! On Debian 10 buster, using many system packages, Sage 9.5.beta7 pulled on an existing older develop built but failed its tests. After `make distclean` though:

[sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-20 Thread Volker Braun
As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html cc60cfebc4 (tag: 9.5.beta7, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.beta7 cdb3614b34 Trac #32858: tiny