[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 10:21:19 PM UTC-7, Matthias Köppe wrote: > > On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 4:25:39 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git >> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at >>

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 10:21:19 PM UTC-7, Matthias Köppe wrote: > > On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 4:25:39 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git >> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at >>

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta12 released

I could compile it on Mac OS 10.15.6 but failed in making ptestlong: The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarilyduring this run of 'make all-start'):* documentation:         dochtml  last build time: Sep 7 09:57  log file:       

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

Hi, Le lundi 7 septembre 2020 à 07:21:19 UTC+2, matthia...@gmail.com a écrit : > > ubuntu-bionic-standard (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/1078907737 > > ): > [dochtml] UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta12 released

pynormaliz 2.12 isn't on the mirrors yet (I can work around that) Dima Pasechnik schrieb am Montag, 7. September 2020 um 13:20:34 UTC+2: > please also send the top-level config.log > Otherwise it is not clear how to reproduce this, e.g. what Python is used. > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 10:09 AM

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta12 released

please also send the top-level config.log Otherwise it is not clear how to reproduce this, e.g. what Python is used. On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 10:09 AM Kenji Iohara wrote: > > I could compile it on Mac OS 10.15.6 but failed in making ptestlong: > > The following package(s) may have failed to build

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

I now upgraded to Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS (which may explains why I am reporting errors below I was not reporting before). Moreover, my config.log confirms that I am using python3.8 from my system: ... ## ## ## Checking whether SageMath should

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

Migration from beta 11 to beta 12 (Ubuntu 20-04): - compilation ok. - make ptestlong: sage -t --long --warn-long 110.2 --random-seed=0 src/sage/interfaces/singular.py # Killed due to segmentation fault t.d. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

On Debian testing running on core i5 + 8 GB RAM, upgrading 9.2.beta11 to 9.2.beta12 after make python3-cleanusing all system packages and running ptestlong gives 7 permanent failures : File Result P/T src/sage/schemes/hyperelliptic_curves/monsky_washnitzer.py Killed due to abort P

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

Again, the doctests gets interrupted with an error OSError: [Errno 24] Too many open files. Is it related to Python 3.8? ... -- sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/graphs/generic_graph.py # 2 doctests failed sage -t --long

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 2:48:29 PM UTC+2 Sébastien Labbé wrote: > Again, the doctests gets interrupted with an error OSError: [Errno 24] Too > many open files. Is it related to Python 3.8? > Running tests only with the optional packages (not the external packages), I managed to