On 2016-10-16 20:20, 'Martin R' via sage-release wrote:
It seems that this made openblas build, thank you.
However: the build takes so long that it makes me wonder. Is it
possible that it takes much longer to build this release candidate than
some beta before?
The build of *what* takes so lon
It seems that this made openblas build, thank you.
However: the build takes so long that it makes me wonder. Is it possible
that it takes much longer to build this release candidate than some beta
before?
Should I do a precise timing?
Martin
Am Sonntag, 16. Oktober 2016 15:20:08 UTC+2 schrie
I'd try
OPENBLAS_CONFIGURE="TARGET=ATOM" make
See also https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/983
On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 2:18:18 PM UTC+2, Martin R wrote:
>
> openblas still fails to build on my machine (not sure whether it is
> supposed to build), log is attached.
>
> moreover
openblas still fails to build on my machine (not sure whether it is
supposed to build), log is attached.
moreover, I still don't know which TARGET I should pass.
Martin
martin@Martin-Laptop:~/sage-patchbot$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 55
mode
builds on OSX 10.12 (after make distclean); running tests now
On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 11:09:23 AM UTC, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org
