Re: [sage-release] A detail that matters - please help

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 6:17 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > are there any setbacks in using svg nowadays? > > The only fundamental issue is file size. It's proportional to the number of elements you want to plot. So, e.g. when there are a million points, you end up with a million lines of text in

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.1 released

Hi, can you please try again? I made notes here: https://github.com/sagemath/website/issues/194 This has nothing to do with files.sagemath.org, because this list is served directly from sagemath.org. Besides that, could we change that url to be https:// ? -- Harald -- You received this

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.1.rc0 released

well, I don't know anything about how these upstream spkgs are uploaded, but I have access to the server. I created a symlink from sage_brial to brial. That should help! On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:19 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:13 PM Harald Schilly wrote: >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.1.rc0 released

I tried to build 9.1.rc0 clean from git sources, but it fails at brial it tries to get e.g. http://ftp.leg.uct.ac.za/pub/packages/sage/spkg/upstream/sage_brial/brial-1.2.5.tar.bz2 but fails the path I found is http://sage.mirror.garr.it/mirrors/sage/spkg/upstream/brial/... though. the diff is

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta3 released

some positive feedback: I wasn't able to build beta1 and beta2 for cocalc (that scipy error, not able to find libs), but beta3 works! -- h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta1 released

> > On Thu, 23 Jan 2020, 09:01 Harald Schilly, > wrote: > >> Building it for CoCalc (ubuntu 18.04 docker container) it fails at SciPy. >> Can't find any of the required libs. There was no change in the setup, >> hence I wonder what's going on... I'm happy to check var

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta1 released

Building it for CoCalc (ubuntu 18.04 docker container) it fails at SciPy. Can't find any of the required libs. There was no change in the setup, hence I wonder what's going on... I'm happy to check various env vars! [scipy-1.2.0] Running from scipy source directory.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.rc0 released

I'm not sure how interesting this is, but still ... I made a clean build from the git sources. I got many doctests failures, and each one I checked failed due to additional lines "Long-step dual simplex will be used" -- see: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24824 I guess it picked up my

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta10 released

aren't in the tarball. > > > > On Thursday, December 26, 2019 at 3:04:42 PM UTC+1, Harald Schilly wrote: >> >> I got a build failure (running in an ubuntu 18.04 docker container for >> cocalc). This is the whole log it says to report: >> >> ~:$ cat /ext/sage/sage-dev/lo

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta10 released

I got a build failure (running in an ubuntu 18.04 docker container for cocalc). This is the whole log it says to report: ~:$ cat /ext/sage/sage-dev/logs/pkgs/python3-3.7.3.p1.log Found local metadata for python3-3.7.3.p1 Using cached file /ext/sage/sage-dev/upstream/Python-3.7.3.tar.xz

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7.beta0 released

Ok, I see, I've removed that file and pushed the timestamp of the master mirror. I don't know how to get the correct file, so that's all I can do… On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 12:44 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2019-01-24 12:20, Harald Schilly wrote: > >there is only the master server with

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7.beta0 released

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 8:10 AM Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > And I confirm that the one downloaded from mirrorservice.org > is broken I've disabled that mirror. Ideally, whatever mechanism is downloading the files in Sage should blacklist such a mirror when there is an

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.4.rc0 released

Building it this time (in an ubuntu 18.04 docker container), it got stuck building the documentation. I don't know why, and maybe it was just a one-time fluke, but I'm still reporting this here. Bottom of the output looks like that, where I interrupted it via ctrl-c ... [dochtml] [structure]

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.3 release notes

Commit for website: https://github.com/sagemath/website/commit/daa32c428adc288ec994beb7c44dedec06b74b81 leading to http://www.sagemath.org/changelogs/sage-8.3.txt Thank you :-) -- Harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3 released

Thank you, yes, I'm usually holding back chatting online too much about a release until some binaries -- and ideally some windows build -- is available :-) -- harald On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:15 PM Volker Braun wrote: > > I copied the binaries over. There are no 32-bit binaries at this point

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3 released

On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 1:47:49 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-8.3. As always, you can > get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, > the self-contained source tarball is at >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc2 released

oh ok, sorry for the noise :-) On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > yes, this is a missing dependency of docbuilding on sympy. > just restart the build... > this is one of the current blocker tickets. > > -- > You received this message because you are

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc2 released

For me, the compilation failed (in a docker environment we are running on cocalc). Has anyone seen this sympy-error before? [dochtml] [manifolds] reading sources... [ 96%] tangent_space

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.0.beta0 released

On Friday, March 31, 2017 at 3:44:02 AM UTC+2, kcrisman wrote: > > Remember, we want LOTS OF TESTING of this one - including the Mac > interface. Any possible bugs in the move to the ExportSageNB interface > must be exposed. > I haven't checked it with ExportSageNB, but it's probably worth a

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.6 released

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Thierry wrote: > +1, while it is not necessary to have them on the mirrors, they should all > remain publically available from somewhere. I'm curious, is there really such a value of the development sources? We never archived them

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.6 released

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > Binaries are done! Also, the documentation pages are updated, as is the website. Is it ok if I slim the mirror a little bit by removing old development sources? I think they're only for historic purposes and nobody

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4 released

On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 12:23:20 AM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-7.4. > Maybe I overlooked it, but has there ever been a sage-7.4.txt changelog? -- Harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.rc2 released

On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 1:09:23 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > b7198d2 Trac #21675: Revert the renaming libfplll -> fplll > > Hello, I just tried to build it, but it fails to find it. The lines from the log e.g. say: [libfplll-5.0.3rc0] ERROR [transfer|run:135]: [Errno 404] Not

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.3 released

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 4:40 PM, leif wrote: > Is there demand for sage-7.3-Ubuntu_{14.04,15.10,16.04}-i686.tar.bz2? > (After all, Ubuntu stopped "recommending" their 32-bit OS versions even > on 64-bit machines.) > So, the only thing I can offer are javascript events when

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.0 released

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:01 PM, kcrisman wrote: > (Harald, an app dmg 7.2 ready for mac/intel at > http://www.math-cs.gordon.edu/~kcrisman/sage-7.2-OSX_10.7.5-x86_64.app.dmg - > thanks!) ok, done -- h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.1 released

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > The binaries are complete and on their way to the mirrors now. ​Cool, I'll update the website's version number. -- h​ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release"

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.0 released

Great! I've pushed the version number on the website and the timestamp on files. -- harald On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > The binaries are now on the file server > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.10 released

In case someone hasn't already brought this up: I've just compiled the documentation and http://doc.sagemath.org/ is updated. -- h -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10.beta5 released

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Rob Beezer wrote: > Did the source tarball go out to the mirrors? I'm not sure, but this is the master server from which all the others are feeding from http://files.sagemath.org/devel/index.html -- h -- You received this message because you

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.9.beta5 released

On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 2:44 AM, kcrisman wrote: >> * Whats the content of SAGE_ROOT/upstream/mirror_list >> > 3) It's what is listed in the log (including the weird extra > sagemath.polytechnic.na part). Is there an easy way to regenerate that? > Presumably this is the

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.9.beta5 released

That's a really odd error. Every full hour this mirror_list file is autogenerated by probing the mirrors and selecting those which are online and uptodate. Do you know when you have encountered this? All published website states are in this repository here.

Re: [sage-release] README.txt

It's not known (at least to me) and it's probably the best place to report it here. My suggestion is to remove that readme file from there. It's inside the tarball anyways, right? -- harald On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Marc Mezzarobba m...@mezzarobba.net wrote: Hi, The src/README.txt

Re: [sage-release] README.txt

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: I guess we can remove it safely from the server, as we all have a copy of it? It's exactly that file, right? http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/tree/README.txt I could put that link onto the download page. Then it's

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.6 and 6.7 changelogs

allright, thank you! On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: These are the text changelogs for Sage 6.6 and 6.7, see attachments. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-release group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [sage-release] Re: 16 binaries of Sage 6.7 for Debian and Ubuntu (32 and 64 bits)

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Eric Gourgoulhon egourgoul...@gmail.com wrote: Do you know when these binaries will be on the official Sage mirrors? The file hosting situation at the UW is solved, hence I have to do some tedious work again but there is a bright light at the end of the tunnel.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.7 released

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori jpfl...@gmail.com wrote: Did we loose the French mirror? As you can see on it's page, the timestamp at the bottom is old http://www-ftp.lip6.fr/pub/math/sagemath/index.html (apart from the fact, that the index pages are also not showing newer

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.7 released

On Monday, May 18, 2015 at 1:28:45 AM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: The self-contained binary tarball is on its way to the mirrors. This is a short promotion to use the torrent file. Personally, I think this is the best option. * it picks good mirrors automatically for you, no matter where

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.7 released

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Francois Bissey francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote: All the universities who have employed me here in New Zealand object to peer to peer clients running on their networks and will shut you down. Hmm, good point. I file that under politics :-\ You email

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.7.beta5 released

On Thursday, May 14, 2015 at 1:57:55 AM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball should appear on the mirrors soon. With the new setup, I have started to monitor its operation more closely. If someone is interested, attached are the traffic spikes for

Re: [sage-release] sage releases - DOI number?

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Daniel Krenn kr...@aon.at wrote: Isn't SageMath Mathematical Software System 6.6 an even better title, since it contains SageMath, which should occur everywhere? Back in that re-naming thread, I did argue that the duplicate Math Math in the long title is a bit

Re: [sage-release] Multiple Sage 6.6 binaries for Ubuntu 14.04 ?

The first one has been built by the same buildbot as with the previous binaries (hence, this one is a bit more official) and the second one does from from france. I don't think there is any significant difference. -- harald On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Eric Gourgoulhon

Re: [sage-release] Re: sage releases - DOI number?

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com wrote: Since (one of the) purpose(s) of a DOI is to enhance reproductibility ... So, just two tiny comments by me: 1. There are hashsums inside the sage release for the standard packages, which are part of the

Re: [sage-release] Re: sage releases - DOI number?

there (I guess). But either way, I think it's a neat thing to have ;-) -- Harald On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 12:37:00 PM UTC+2, Harald Schilly wrote: ok, then I'll do it, and I think I've also figured out how to set the Authorname to SageMath Developers instead of claiming that all

Re: [sage-release] sage releases - DOI number?

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:37 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe it is time to change it to not say my name explicitly either. The example you list above says me et al rather than the sage developers. Hi, I can change the autor field any time, I just did copy it from the wiki page

[sage-release] Re: Virtual Appliance for Sage-6.6

done! On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: Here is the virtual machine image: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/vbraun/vm/ Harald: please mirror -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-release group. To

Re: [sage-release] tons of builds for 32 bits

Hi, thank you! I've put them on the mirror: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/sagemath/sage-mirror/linux/32bit/index.html I've trans-compressed the files for Ubuntu14* with lrzip. They safe about 50%. Maybe you can tar-compress them with lrztar in the first place? -- h On Fri, Mar 27,

Re: [sage-release] Typos in changelog for 6.5

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: On 2015-02-27 11:13, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: Harald: please update allright! will do! -- harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-release group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.6.beta0 released

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:52 PM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote: Are the sizes on http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/sagemath/sage-mirror/devel/index.html correct? For example, I am finding that the download of the tarball for sage-6.6b0 is 479.7 MB, not 457.44 MB. It could be the

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (ipython notebook and ssl)

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: On 2014-11-19 17:28, kcrisman wrote: Please run it again Done. So, is there somewhere a proper sage-6.4.txt release log file for the website? -- Harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4.rc0 released

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: In my opinion, doctest output should be the actual output of a Sage run somewhere and not artificially be adjusted Well, if there are different outputs for the same input, which one to pick? IMHO, in this case it's

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4.beta4 released

On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: Note: boxen will be reinstalled soon, and the source tarball link might be unavailable. Watch this thread for an updated url ;-) should one of us put it on the mirrors? -- harald -- You received this message because

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta1 released

On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori jpfl...@gmail.com wrote: It seems that the tarball for the devel sources is very outdated on mirrors (at least the french and chinese ones). yes, that's simply not updated. the website for the development versions is also out of date. -- h

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta0 released

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 9:44 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: Nono, this is all garbage - I see what happened. git doesn't know that origin is in fact not behind because I never pulled from origin! I think that is the problem - have I diagnosed correctly? Git by default doesn't talk

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.3 released

Took me a day and a small headache, but finally let me present: http://sagemath.org/doc/reference/combinat/index.html http://sagemath.org/doc/reference/graphs/index.html (I'm not sure what exactly is new, but it seems like there is at least more) Harald On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:02 AM,

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage-6.3.rc0 released

On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: In any case, can you post logs/pkgs/r-3.1.1.p0.log Tried again after pulling the new dev update, but no surprises: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/schilly/logs/r-3.1.1.p0.log harald -- You received this message

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage-6.3.rc0 released

On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: Also, where is the /home/harri/.local coming from? Is that from some environment variable that you have set? Well, no idea, I've certainly adjusted some knobs on my ​ubuntu box … with maybe not so fortunate effects.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage-6.3.rc0 released

On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting, which gcc version? ​well, mabye it is picking up the wrong file? (I'll delete my CCACHE and try again) ... i don't know. version numbers: (sage-sh)$ which gcc

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.2 changelog

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:11 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: By the way, this still hasn't made it to http://sagemath.org/mirror/src/changelogs/sage-6.2.txt - I'm cc:ing Harald. I'm aware of that. It will happen in the next days, I promise ;-) Harald -- You received this message

[sage-release] Re: Sage-6.1.1 Virtual Appliance

thank's! file is on its way around the world ;-) h On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: I've updated the scripts for generating the virtual appliance, its now based on CentOS 6 which should be less maintenance effort... Updated VM is here:

Re: [sage-release] Page with closed tickets for sage-6.1 and sage-6.1.1 does not exist

Thanks. Good catch. I believe the tickets.html file is the one in jeroen's directory. It needs to be copied to that location from here http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/sage-git/logs/ Harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-release

Re: [sage-release] Releasing Sage 6.0

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Jaap Spies jaapsp...@gmail.com wrote: Please, tell me more exact what you want to see. I'm rusty in building Sage! The error message mentions log files for both packages, i.e. log file: /home/jaap/downloads/sage-6.0/ logs/pkgs/atlas-3.10.1.p7.log and log file: