Re: [sage-release] Is 10.3.beta5 released ?

Hi, I looks like Volker just put together a release, but hasn't pushed the corresponding git repo to github. If you download that tarball you link to, it contains a git repo with a 10.3.beta5 tag, lots of merged code, etc. William On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 9:50 AM Gonzalo Tornaría wrote: > > A

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.0.beta9 released

GPT-4 quick summary: "The SageMath 10.0.beta9 release features numerous updates, improvements, and bug fixes, including faster computation of Frobenius powers and Kohel isogenies, refactored poset examples for better code coverage, updated documentation and developer manual, fixes for pycodestyle

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8 Release Tour

Hi, I added py and sh after all the fenced code blocks (triple backticks), so now all the code and shell examples are syntax highlighted. William On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 4:58 PM Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > That is a nice summary of the GitHub migration efforts. Thank you. > > -- > You received this

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6 released

Hi, Thanks for the new release! I built the cocalc-docker images [1] using sage-9.6 on both x86-64 and amd64 (Apple Silicon) and the builds worked fine, and everything I tested regarding integration with CoCalc also worked fine. I've updated these images on Dockerhub. CoCalc-docker is

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.6.beta2 released

For what it's worth, I use a free app from the MacOS app store called Amphetamine: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/amphetamine/id937984704?mt=12 This makes it easy to make the laptop stay on indefinitely, even if the lid is closed. It works very robustly. -- William On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 1:32

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 released

Trying to build on an M1 ARM Mac with MacOS 12.x finally gets past the very first package (GMP), due to upgrading to 6.2.1. It fails with gfortran, with an error about this version of macOS being "unreleased" (which is not true, of course -- it is released): [gfortran-10.3.0] checking if mkdir

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta7 ?

I think the develop branch is regularly changing with new commits each day (hopefully) as Volker merges positively reviewed tickets. You can browse pages and pages of commits that came after 9.5.beta6 to the develop branch here: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/commits/develop It looks like he

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:30 AM Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 10:13:14 PM UTC-7 William Stein wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:00 PM Matthias Köppe >> wrote: >> >>> It's really just the command "tox -e >>&g

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

don't know, though "grep -i tachyon tox.ini" doesn't output anything, so I'm guessing it doesn't. William > > On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 8:37:54 PM UTC-7 William Stein wrote: > >> What did you do exactly? For example did you install tachyon >> systemwide

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

tly > newer than ubuntu-focal (20.04) > > sage -t --random-seed=0 > src/sage/algebras/quatalg/quaternion_algebra_cython.pyx >[10 tests, 0.17 s] > > -- > > All tests passed! > > > > > On T

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

platforms, e.g., recent Rasberry Pi? On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 10:55 AM William Stein wrote: > Here's how "make test" ended: > > sage -t --random-seed=225297532770316936918573996029610176361 > src/sage/groups/class_function.py # Timed out > sage -t --random-seed=22529753277031

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

stuck at 0 percent for a long time and manually killed it. So it looks like nothing is giving wrong answers, but a couple of things are randomly hanging. -- William On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 10:31 AM William Stein wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 10:21 AM Matthias Köppe > wrote: >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 10:21 AM Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 9:13:25 AM UTC-7 William Stein wrote: > >> This is a quick update about building the 9.5.beta5 version of Sage on an >> M1 Mac under Docker aarch64 Linux. >> >> > A quick

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

trix/matrix_integer_dense.pyx", line 1, in init sage.matrix.matrix_integer_dense (build/cythonized/sage/matrix/matrix_integer_dense.cpp:57704) ImportError: /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libgomp.so.1: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 5:33 PM William Stein wrote

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 4:35 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:28 PM William Stein wrote: > >> Great idea. Thanks Dima! >> >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 3:37 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon,

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

Great idea. Thanks Dima! On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 3:37 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 10:18 PM William Stein wrote: > >> I tried to build sage-9.5.beta5 on a very clean Linux Ubuntu:20.04 image >> with standard dev packages (in Docker) but on an

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

I tried to build sage-9.5.beta5 on a very clean Linux Ubuntu:20.04 image with standard dev packages (in Docker) but on an ARM aarch64 architecture instead of Intel. It fails with Tachyon simply saying "Error: Sorry, your platform isn't supported by Tachyon and/or Sage. Exiting...". I don't know

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta0 released

Hi, The official non-beta OpenSSL 3.0.0 release just happened. Finally! On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 3:20 PM 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release wrote: > > > > > On Aug 31, 2021, at 15:38 , Volker Braun wrote: > > > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.5.beta1 released

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 5:46 AM Erik Bray wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 1:25 PM Eric Gourgoulhon > wrote: > > > > Le lundi 29 octobre 2018 13:18:11 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > >> > >> I've noticed something new in this release, certainly introduced by > >> 6d6c459c6b Trac #26174:

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.0.beta11 released

it this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- William Stein -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.6.rc1 released

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:19 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > I pulled sage-7.6.rc1, typed 'time MAKE="make -j1" make ', and the > build got stuck on ECL. This is how top looked, with nearly 3 hours Hitting control+c, then typing just plain "make&quo

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.5.beta4 released

There is really no good way to deal with this besides proper OS packages or rebuild sage from source when you do nontrivial system upgrades. On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:27 AM Francois Bissey < francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > libvpx has stung before. When we upgraded linbox I made sure

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4 released

OK, something will happen by next Monday... On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote: > On 2016-11-02 21:12, William Stein wrote: >> >> Jereon - is this script the thing you want from >> disk.math.washington.edu? > >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4 released

Jereon - is this script the thing you want from disk.math.washington.edu? Is that the only copy? If so, next time I'm on campus I can turn that machine on and get the script... On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Samuel Lelièvre wrote: > The changelog is produced after

Re: [sage-release] 7.3.beta6

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 6:36:49 PM UTC+2, William Stein wrote: >> >> The build still failed due to libpynac issues >> "/projects/sage/dev/sage-7.3.beta6/local/lib/li

Re: [sage-release] 7.3.beta6

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:53 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Since the build failed with "> [pynac-0.6.7] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find > -lao", I installed libao-dev, which is an Ubuntu package: > > libao-dev - Cross Platform Audio Out

Re: [sage-release] 7.3.beta6

der libao-dev something I have to install before Sage, given that I have also installed giac.I'm sure this will cause great confusion to other people who like to install lots of math software on the same system in the future though. William > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:39 AM William Stei

Re: [sage-release] 7.3.beta6

Ubuntu 15.10 and I said 16.04 before. William On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:38 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On sagemathcloud (Ubuntu 16.04+lots) I've built all the betas up to > 7.3.beta4 fine. 7.3.beta5 (via upgrade) won't build, nor will > 7.3.beta6. The

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.3.beta0 released

Builds for me. (On SMC you can type sage-develop in a terminal to use this version immediately.) On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.2.rc0 released

Either my build is completely hosed, or "sage -bdist" is completely broken: salvus@compute7-us:/projects/sage/sage-develop$ time ./sage -bdist tmp sage-run received unknown option: -bdist usage: sage [options] Try 'sage -h' for more information. salvus@compute7-us:/projects/sage/sage-develop$

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.2.beta6 released

Hi, I built this but "anything??" results in a traceback. This looks like a serious bug, which doctesting might not catch. Is it just me (quite possible, since I built 7.2.beta5 first)? Sorry for the noise if this is just me. ~/tmp$ sage-develop

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.2.beta6 released

In case you want to quickly try something out, this release is now sage-develop on SageMathCloud (if you use the terminal). William On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Friday, April 29, 2016 at 10:41:51 AM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> docs

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.2.beta5 released

Hi, If you type "sage-develop" in a terminal on sagemathcloud, it'll run this 7.2.beta5. (Note tested: To make it work with worksheets you would do "cd ~; mkdir -p bin; cd bin; ln -s /usr/local/bin/sage-develop sage" and restart the sage worksheet server.) -- William On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.9.rc0 released

On Monday, September 28, 2015, Volker Braun wrote: > Hmm but /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpari-gmp-tls.so.2.7.2 brings just a > slightly different version of Pari's concat. It may very well be that it > doesn't trigger libkpathsea crashing but thats just by chance; the

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.9.rc0 released

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:00 AM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > In Sage-6.7 this library (which is *pure python*) works well: > >https://github.com/datasift > > In Sage-6.9.beta6 (for me) this library crashes with the following > weird traceback. Any ideas

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.9.rc0 released

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > Symbol collision. Unless TeX's libkpathsea really intends to use concat() > from Pari... That makes sense. Basically you're noticing this part of the traceback: ...

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.9.rc0 released

In Sage-6.7 this library (which is *pure python*) works well: https://github.com/datasift In Sage-6.9.beta6 (for me) this library crashes with the following weird traceback. Any ideas? (sage-sh) [m 4a5f054258734eeda85ca18c706e8bcd@compute4-us:tmp$ which [Kpython Python 2.7.9

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.7 released

Hi, Sage-6.7 is now the default on SageMathCloud. William On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Justin C. Walker jus...@mac.com wrote: On May 21, 2015, at 19:03 , kcrisman wrote: Justin, could you perhaps contribute a binary for the 10.6.8 platform? We certainly still get people on older

Re: [sage-release] Re: 16 binaries of Sage 6.7 for Debian and Ubuntu (32 and 64 bits)

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Eric Gourgoulhon egourgoul...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you very much Thierry ! Do you know when these binaries will be on the official Sage mirrors? Harald is working on it right now... Regards, Eric. -- You received this message because you are

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.7.beta5 released

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: As usual, get the develop git branch. We now measure the fastest mirror and download packages from there, this should result in a net speedup. Let us know if you encounter any problems. Alternatively, the

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.7.beta5 released

Hi, I built sage-6.7.beta4 fine, then did git pull, then build sage-6.7.beta5 fine, which passed all tests. But I can't do ./sage -bdist ...: sage -t --long --warn-long 64.2 local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sagenb-0.11.4-py2.7.egg/sagenb/misc/sphinxify.py [14 tests, 1.23 s]

Re: [sage-release] sage releases - DOI number?

On Thursday, April 23, 2015, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote: So, here it is: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17093 LaTeX: @misc{w_a_stein_et_al_2015_17093, author = {W. A. Stein et al.} title= {SageMath 6.6}, month= apr, year =

Re: Install with openssl [Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.6.rc2 released]

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:26 AM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote: On 04/08/2015 12:48 PM, Daniel Krenn wrote: Am 2015-04-08 um 12:28 schrieb Vincent Delecroix: At least, does 'sage -i openssl' before 'make' work? Seems to be possible (tried; but still compiling). It used to work and hence

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.6.rc0 released

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: As usual, get the develop branch or the source tarball from http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 7f1fbd5 Updated Sage version to 6.6.rc0 Hi, On SageMathCloud, make ptestlong worked perfectly and all tests

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.6.rc0 released

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: One more design issue is the lack of a top margin ... Yes, put in this when fixing the color: margin-top: 6px; On Saturday, March 21, 2015 at 3:27:25 PM UTC+1, William Stein wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 7:05

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.6.beta5 released

On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: This is the hard part: well-defined subset of the optional packages and tests Once you fill this in, the testing can trivially be done on the buildbot. These are the optional packages I care about (the ones

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.6.beta5 released

On Monday, March 16, 2015, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe its not quite as trivial since optional packages won't build on every supported platform, so what is the winning criterion? Perhaps with docker we could require that an optional package comes with a Dockerfile that

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.6.beta5 released

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: On 2015-03-13 18:37, William Stein wrote: M = self._new_uninitialized_matrix(self._ncols,B._ncols) It seems that your machine is extremely slow: Sage is still constructing the matrix to contain

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.6.beta5 released

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: On 2015-03-13 18:10, William Stein wrote: On 64-bit Ubuntu 14.10, make ptestlong yields one doctest failure. Since it's something that I think absolutely anybody who ran the doctest on any system would see, I guess

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.6.beta3 released

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 9:25 AM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote: On 03/07/2015 04:56 PM, William Stein wrote: (1) the group for that directory is the user (which is standard on Linux, btw, but not other os's) and Well, obviously checking which users belong to the file's group would be too

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.6.beta3 released

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: Should be fixed in 6.6.beta3. However if you built 6.6.beta2 then setuptools created the directory with wrong permissions, and installing 6.6.beta3 on top will not change the permissions. Just delete .sage/.python-eggs

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:50 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: Do you have /scratch/wstein/sage-6.5.beta5/src/setup.py? I just checked and that is definitely in the tarball. Nope -- /scratch/wstein/sage-6.5

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta5 released

...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-release@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.5.beta0 released

-- Total time for all tests: 15.4 seconds cpu time: 2.2 seconds cumulative wall time: 15.2 seconds Just out of curiosity, does it fail repeatedly for you? -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4 released

at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-release group

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4.rc1 released

cpu time: 1.3 seconds cumulative wall time: 1.3 seconds -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-release group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4.rc1 released

On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: #17278 Thanks; positively reviewed. On Sunday, November 2, 2014 7:54:59 PM UTC, William Stein wrote: On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Volker Braun vbrau...@gmail.com wrote: This is the second release candidate. Most

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4.beta5 released

** 1 item had failures: 1 of 27 in sage.combinat.combinat.stirling_number2 [396 tests, 1 failure, 14.48 s] William -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed

[sage-release] sage-6.3

Hi Volker, I just realized that it seems to be well over 3 months since sage-6.2 was released, and there still isn't a sage-6.3 release candidate. Is there any sort of plan or timetable for when you sage-6.3 will get released? 4+ months between releases seems a bit long to me. Do you need

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.2.rc2 released

Building this from scratch on SageMathCloud and applying all my optional stuff worked well. There were no problems with building R graphics support, and I didn't have to do anything to hack around that issue. -- William -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http

Re: Building Sage on Chromebooks [was Re: [sage-release] Re: sage-5.8.rc0 released]

/group/sage-release. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-release group. To unsubscribe from this group