On 16 May 2018 at 12:06, Samuel Lelièvre wrote:
> Would changing the doctest from
>
> sage: pol.roots(multiplicities=False, proof=False)
>
> to
>
> sage: sorted(pol.roots(multiplicities=False, proof=False))
>
> solve this?
>
I think that in other places where
Would changing the doctest from
sage: pol.roots(multiplicities=False, proof=False)
to
sage: sorted(pol.roots(multiplicities=False, proof=False))
solve this?
2018-05-16 10:16 GMT+02:00 Dima Pasechnik :
> in this case doctest basically compares strings,
> obtained
in this case doctest basically compares strings,
obtained from the list of roots.
Order of the latter is not important.
By right, one should compare sets, not lists.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
> On May 15, 2018, at 17:07 , Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 9:34:55 PM UTC+1, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> > On May 9, 2018, at 11:44 , Volker Braun wrote:
> >
> > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the
On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 9:34:55 PM UTC+1, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
>
> > On May 9, 2018, at 11:44 , Volker Braun > wrote:
> >
> > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> On May 9, 2018, at 11:44 , Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
Built from a fresh clone/update of