Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta2 released

2019-09-18 Thread Clemens Heuberger
For the record, I also needed to install libpango1.0-dev to fix that. No idea why it work in previous sage versions, but no longer from 8.9.beta2 onwards. Am 16.07.19 um 12:48 schrieb Clemens Heuberger: On one of my machines (Linux Mint 18.2 Sonya), I get the following reproducible doctest

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.rc1 released

2019-12-31 Thread Clemens Heuberger
I probably had a similar problem on _one_ of my three Linux Mint patchbots. I then installed all recommended dependencies listed on http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/source.html#linux-recommended-installation as well as libpango1.0-dev . Then, IIRC, it worked again. The libpan

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.rc0 released

2020-10-07 Thread Clemens Heuberger
In contrast to 9.2.beta14, on my Linux Mint 19.3 Tricia machine I get (after a fresh build) ./sage -t -p --all --long --logfile=logs/ptestlong.log Traceback (most recent call last): File "/local/cheuberg/local/sage-9.2.rc0/src/bin/sage-runtests", line 181, in DC = DocTestController(opti

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.rc1 released

2020-10-13 Thread Clemens Heuberger
On a Linux Mint 19.3 Tricia machine, I get the following error on 9.2.rc1: ./sage -t -p --all --long --logfile=logs/ptestlong.log Traceback (most recent call last): File "/local/cheuberg/local/sage-9.2.rc1/src/bin/sage-runtests", line 181, in DC = DocTestController(options, args) File

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.rc1 released

2020-10-13 Thread Clemens Heuberger
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30740 - but apparently it was not enough. On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 9:06 AM Clemens Heuberger wrote: On a Linux Mint 19.3 Tricia machine, I get the following error on 9.2.rc1: ./sage -t -p --all --long --logfile=logs/ptestlong.log Traceback (most recent call last

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.rc3 released

2020-10-22 Thread Clemens Heuberger
Strangely enough, make distclean and then make ptestlong made the error go away after the ticket which caused problems yesterday; Trac #30425. So I try to refine my git bisection. Am 21.10.20 um 19:41 schrieb Clemens Heuberger: On one machine (Linux Mint 18.2 Sonya) (which also serves as a

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta3 released

2020-12-07 Thread Clemens Heuberger
I get (Linux Mint 19.3 Tricia): $ LANG=C ./sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py Running doctests with ID 2020-12-07-09-45-22-291831e7. Using --optional=build,ccache,debian,dochtml,memlimit,pip,sage,sage_spkg Doctesting 1 file. sage -t --long --warn-long 44.1 --random-seed=0 s

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta3 released

2020-12-11 Thread Clemens Heuberger
> On 7/12/2020, at 9:50 PM, Clemens Heuberger wrote: > > > I get (Linux Mint 19.3 Tricia): > > $ LANG=C ./sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py > Running doctests with ID 2020-12-07-09-45-22-291831e7. > Using --option

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta0 released

2021-05-27 Thread Clemens Heuberger
Also on Ubuntu 18.04 (without any optional packages apart ccache installed), I have the failing doctest with graph.py (two out of three runs) and consistently $ ./sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/misc/package.py Running doctests with ID 2021-05-27-16-31-10-59754af4. Using --optional=build

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.4.beta5 released

2021-07-27 Thread Clemens Heuberger
Am 19.07.21 um 01:19 schrieb Volker Braun: I think we are in a reasonable shape right now, so if anyone is still in favor of a fast release cycle we could do it now... discuss ;-) I would appreciate if Trac #32198 could still be included into 9.4: this ticket slightly changes the signature o

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta1 released

2021-09-15 Thread Clemens Heuberger
On my patchbot, I get an error when testing ticket 0 sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/misc/weak_dict.pyx ** File "src/sage/misc/weak_dict.pyx", line 38, in sage.misc.weak_dict Failed example: len(D) > 1 Expected:

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta1 released

2022-05-31 Thread Clemens Heuberger
With a Python 3.8.10 installed as a system python, I get a persistent doctest failure (Linux Mint 20.2 uma): Running doctests with ID 2022-05-29-17-41-28-c07c4f34. Using --optional=ccache,debian,pip,sage,sage_spkg Features to be detected: 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,data

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.rc2 released

2022-09-19 Thread Clemens Heuberger
On most of my machines, ptestlong passes (except for the usual transient failures in src/sage/interfaces/process.pyx ). However, on one machine, where there has not been any problem with 9.7.rc1, I consistently get the doctest failure below. It seems to depend on the random seed; with another

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.8.beta0 released

2022-09-28 Thread Clemens Heuberger
I encountered one doctest error in src/sage/schemes/toric/sheaf/klyachko.py which depends on the random seed: Failing seed: 76370439031557170215448337120651728168 Running doctests with ID 2022-09-28-10-42-42-4892f4f5. Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/local/cheuberg/local/sage-9.8.beta0/local' and SAG

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.0.rc0 released

2023-04-23 Thread Clemens Heuberger
On two Linux Mint 20.3 machines, I got doctest errors which I have not seen before in the previous betas, see below. Regards, Clemens Heuberger $ ./sage -t --long src/sage/modules/torsion_quadratic_module.py Running doctests with ID 2023-04-24-07-32-35-be944086. Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.3.beta6 released

2024-01-23 Thread Clemens Heuberger
On one machine, I encountered persistent doctest errors with a specific random seed: sage -t --long --warn-long 51.5 --random-seed=218399045362864612956198671406486371465 src/sage/plot/plot.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t --long --warn-long 51.5 --random-seed=2183990453628646129561986714064863

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4.beta5 released

2014-10-12 Thread Clemens Heuberger
just one remark: the last three tickets merged into 6.4.beta5 do not have status "closed" in trac yet. Am 2014-10-12 um 17:47 schrieb Volker Braun: > Use get git "develop" branch! Alternatively, download > http://sage.sagedev.org/home/release/sage-6.4.beta5.tar.gz > > 026cc65 Trac #17131: Improve

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4.rc0 released

2014-10-31 Thread Clemens Heuberger
Am 2014-10-30 um 15:12 schrieb Volker Braun: > Notable changes are > > * OSX 10.10 support > * SageNB now can do 3d plots without Java, so it is usable again in chrome. > > Please test, especially if you are a notebook user! prior to 6.4.beta6, the following worked: $ /local/sage/sage-6.3/sag

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4.rc0 released

2014-11-01 Thread Clemens Heuberger
Am 2014-11-02 um 04:13 schrieb kcrisman: > sage -n option=choice > > should in principle work with all options that work with > > sage: notebook(option=choice) > > and if they don't that is a bug. It seems that quote signs are now required for strings and were disallowed before: $ /local/sag

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4.rc0 released

2014-11-03 Thread Clemens Heuberger
Am 2014-11-03 um 16:05 schrieb Volker Braun: > IMHO that is the expected outcome for an optional command line argument. If > you > don't want the command line parsing to end (and not treat "directory..." as > value) then you should use > > sage -n -- directory=sage.sagenb I'd appreciate if we wo

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4.rc0 released

2014-11-05 Thread Clemens Heuberger
On 2014-11-06 02:41, kcrisman wrote: > > It is an interface that worked the same way for a long time and > achieved > de facto status. > > > Fine, if you don't want a way to start the ipython notebook then I can > take > out the optional argument. > > > Perhaps I wil

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4.rc0 released

2014-11-06 Thread Clemens Heuberger
On 2014-11-06 15:59, kcrisman wrote: > > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17280 > > If you would be so kind as to confirm on that ticket that the fix there does > indeed fix it and the code seems right to you? (Assuming you've tried it > out.) I'll try it out within the next two days (sorry for

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.5.beta0 released

2014-11-16 Thread Clemens Heuberger
Am 2014-11-16 um 16:41 schrieb Volker Braun: > Hot on the heels of the 6.4 release, here is the first beta for the next > version. As usual, get the "develop" git branch. [...] > Mini-changelog: [...] > 1e39935 Trac #16747: Add optional Arb package (arbitrary-precision > floating-point ball arithme

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.5.beta0 released

2014-11-17 Thread Clemens Heuberger
Am 2014-11-16 um 16:41 schrieb Volker Braun: > Hot on the heels of the 6.4 release, here is the first beta for the next > version. As usual, get the "develop" git branch. make ptestlong gave one failing doctest: $ sage -t --long src/sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx Running doctests with ID 2014-11-18-07-1

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.5.beta0 released

2014-11-18 Thread Clemens Heuberger
Am 2014-11-18 um 08:54 schrieb William Stein: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Clemens Heuberger > wrote: >> make ptestlong gave one failing doctest: >> > ... >> sage -t --long src/sage/misc/cachef

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.5.rc1 released

2015-02-09 Thread Clemens Heuberger
On 2015-02-09 20:08, William A Stein wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Daniel Krenn wrote: >> "make ptestlong" completed successfully on current Debian stable. >> >> Daniel > > make testlong also completed successfully on current Ubuntu 14.10. > make ptestlong is also successful on not so

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.5.rc2 released

2015-02-13 Thread Clemens Heuberger
On 2015-02-13 14:35, Daniel Krenn wrote: > Am 2015-02-13 um 02:11 schrieb Volker Braun: >> This should be the last rc unless you find a new bug, so please give it >> a whirl! > > make ptestlong passed von Debian stable. same on Linux Mint Maya (corresponding to Ubuntu 12.04 LTS). CH -- You rec

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.5.rc3 released

2015-02-13 Thread Clemens Heuberger
On 2015-02-13 13:24, Volker Braun wrote: > Hot on the heels of rc2, this should fix the remaining OSX testsuite failure make ptestlong passed on Linux Mint Maya (corresponding to Ubuntu 12.04 LTS). CH -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" g

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.6.beta6 released

2015-03-20 Thread Clemens Heuberger
t to this group, send email to sage-release@googlegroups.com > <mailto:sage-release@googlegroups.com>. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Univ.-Prof. Dr. Clemens Heuberger

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.6.beta6 released

2015-03-21 Thread Clemens Heuberger
ut I had now three compilation attempts where ccache always had the same problem as described below. Manually, the link downloads fine. regards, CH > > > > On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 12:12:32 PM UTC+1, Clemens Heuberger wrote: > > > I usually build and t

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.6.beta6 released

2015-03-22 Thread Clemens Heuberger
ggestions. CH > > > On Saturday, March 21, 2015 at 9:18:21 AM UTC+1, Clemens Heuberger wrote: > > On 2015-03-20 13:30, Volker Braun wrote: > > The link seems to work right now, maybe it was transient? > > I don't think so. I retried it today, stil

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.9.rc0 released

2015-09-26 Thread Clemens Heuberger
ubuntu 14.04, 64 bit, 4 GB RAM: make -j4 ran out of memory while building documentation, last line in logfile: [tutorial ] reading sources... [ 43%] sagetex I then killed 4 processes using 2.7 GB each. On the same machine, there haven't been any problems with make -j4 for any beta or rc re

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.9.rc0 released

2015-09-28 Thread Clemens Heuberger
I recompiled 6.9.beta7 and 6.9.rc0 last night one after the other on the same machine with negligible other load. 6.9.beta7: 81 minutes 6.9.rc0:173 minutes (make -j4 with 8 GB RAM, linux 64 bit). I currently do not have a breakdown as "time" would give it (because I did not know that this

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.9.rc0 released

2015-10-03 Thread Clemens Heuberger
Am 2015-10-03 um 11:28 schrieb Jeroen Demeyer: > On 2015-09-28 16:22, Clemens Heuberger wrote: >> >> I recompiled 6.9.beta7 and 6.9.rc0 last night one after the other on the same >> machine with negligible other load. > > What does the word "recompiled" mean

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.9.rc0 released

2015-10-03 Thread Clemens Heuberger
Am 2015-10-03 um 19:00 schrieb Clemens Heuberger: > rm -rf sage-6.9.beta7 > git clone ... > make -j4; ./sage -i ccache; make I repeated this tonight: 6.9.beta7: real88m39.989s user247m40.494s sys 19m13.816s 6.9.rc0: real181m18.663s

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.9.rc3 released

2015-10-07 Thread Clemens Heuberger
Am 2015-10-07 um 01:16 schrieb Volker Braun: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html linux mint 17.2 64 bit: I did the following: clone into a fresh dire

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.9.rc3 released

2015-10-08 Thread Clemens Heuberger
Am 2015-10-08 um 10:23 schrieb Jeroen Demeyer: >> and got many doctest failures. I include here just the first few lines of the >> summary: > It would be better to see the actual failures, the summary says nothing. It seems to have been a false alarm: my home directory was apparently unavailable d

Re: [sage-release] Sage-6.10.beta0 released

2015-10-15 Thread Clemens Heuberger
linux mint 17.1, 64 bit: I get one error (I used a temporary directory as DOT_SAGE): sage -t --long src/sage/doctest/test.py ** File "src/sage/doctest/test.py", line 26, in sage.doctest.test Failed example: subprocess.call([

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.6.beta3 released

2017-02-08 Thread Clemens Heuberger
Not yet present at trac, neither: $ git fetch trac $ git log -1 trac/develop commit 375d4ee776ec1b73bf581843fe42dec320c7f861 Author: Volker Braun Date: Wed Feb 1 20:20:54 2017 +0100 Updated SageMath version to 7.6.beta2 Clemens Am 2017-02-09 um 06:47 schrieb Henri Girard: > Idem here, n

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.beta3 released

2019-04-23 Thread Clemens Heuberger
On one of my patchbots https://patchbot.sagemath.org/log/0/LinuxMint/18.2/x86_64/4.4.0-138-generic/rk02-math/2019-04-20%2005:53:22 I get non-transient errors (also when run separately) in sage -t --long src/sage/doctest/forker.py # 6 doctests failed sage -t --long src/sage/doctest/con

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.beta3 released

2019-04-23 Thread Clemens Heuberger
I forgot to actually append the log. Here it is. Am 23.04.19 um 12:30 schrieb Clemens Heuberger: On one of my patchbots https://patchbot.sagemath.org/log/0/LinuxMint/18.2/x86_64/4.4.0-138-generic/rk02-math/2019-04-20%2005:53:22 I get non-transient errors (also when run separately) in

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.beta3 released

2019-04-23 Thread Clemens Heuberger
The logfile I posted earlier was produced outside the patchbot. Am 23.04.19 um 13:10 schrieb Daniel Krenn: On 23.04.19 12:55, Clemens Heuberger wrote: Am 23.04.19 um 12:30 schrieb Clemens Heuberger: On one of my patchbots   https://patchbot.sagemath.org/log/0/LinuxMint/18.2/x86_64

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.beta3 released

2019-06-08 Thread Clemens Heuberger
, Clemens Heuberger a écrit : The logfile I posted earlier was produced outside the patchbot. Am 23.04.19 um 13:10 schrieb Daniel Krenn: > On 23.04.19 12:55, Clemens Heuberger wrote: >> Am 23.04.19 um 12:30 schrieb Clemens Heuberger: >>> On o

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta2 released

2019-07-16 Thread Clemens Heuberger
On one of my machines (Linux Mint 18.2 Sonya), I get the following reproducible doctest failure: sage -t --long --warn-long 48.6 src/sage/interfaces/r.py ** File "src/sage/interfaces/r.py", line 613, in sage.interfaces.r.R.png F