[sage-support] Re: trouble building 2.8.13 in Mac OS 10.5.1

2007-11-24 Thread mabshoff
t; sage-2.8.14.rc2.tar> > > > Try only the flint spkg in the release candidate. The whole > > release candidate > > won't build for you, since building the cremona spkg in there is > > currently > > broken on OS X. > > Yep, it broke on both 10.4.11 and 10.5.1.

[sage-support] Re: trouble building 2.8.13 in Mac OS 10.5.1

2007-11-24 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Nov 24, 2007, at 17:07 , William Stein wrote: > > On Nov 24, 2007 1:26 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> On Nov 24, 2007, at 12:58 , Neal wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I had some trouble buidling the latest version of SAGE on my MacBook >>> Pro under 10.5.1. Specif

[sage-support] Re: trouble building 2.8.13 in Mac OS 10.5.1

2007-11-24 Thread William Stein
On Nov 24, 2007 1:26 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 24, 2007, at 12:58 , Neal wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > I had some trouble buidling the latest version of SAGE on my MacBook > > Pro under 10.5.1. Specifically, flint didn't install correctly. > > Here's the rele

[sage-support] Re: using Singular's invariant_ring

2007-11-24 Thread Simon King
Dear David, perhaps a better answer: > Suppose a finite matrix group G generated by 3x3 matrices > A1, A2, ..., Ar acts on the polynomial ring QQ[x,y,z]. > Singular has a command which computes a basis of > invariants. Are you actually interested in a Hironaka decomposition? Or are you looking

[sage-support] Re: using Singular's invariant_ring

2007-11-24 Thread Simon King
Dear David, On Nov 24, 10:38 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sage: R = singular.ring(0, '(x,y,z)', 'dp') > sage: A = singular.matrix(3,3,'0,1,0,-1,0,0,0,0,-1') > sage: singular.eval('LIB "finvar.lib";') > > Now, I'm stuck. Everything I try returns an error. > For example, I expec

[sage-support] Re: Possible bug in graph isomorphism search_tree function

2007-11-24 Thread Dustin Pluta
We didn't really have any expectations about the size of these automorphism groups (this isn't the central part of the project), so I'm not sure if this output is reasonable for the given graph. But here's what search_tree gives: ([[0, 6, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 7, 8, 14, 10, 11, 12, 13, 9, 15, 16, 17, 2

[sage-support] using Singular's invariant_ring

2007-11-24 Thread David Joyner
Hi: Suppose a finite matrix group G generated by 3x3 matrices A1, A2, ..., Ar acts on the polynomial ring QQ[x,y,z]. Singular has a command which computes a basis of invariants. I'm stuck trying to run them in SAGE. The commands at http://www.singular.uni-kl.de/Manual/latest/sing_1083.htm#SEC1142

[sage-support] Re: trouble building 2.8.13 in Mac OS 10.5.1

2007-11-24 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Nov 24, 2007, at 12:58 , Neal wrote: > > Hi All, > > I had some trouble buidling the latest version of SAGE on my MacBook > Pro under 10.5.1. Specifically, flint didn't install correctly. > Here's the relevant part of install.log: This has been discussed and, we hope, diagnosed and fixed.

[sage-support] trouble building 2.8.13 in Mac OS 10.5.1

2007-11-24 Thread Neal
Hi All, I had some trouble buidling the latest version of SAGE on my MacBook Pro under 10.5.1. Specifically, flint didn't install correctly. Here's the relevant part of install.log: collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [fmpz_poly-test] Error 1 ls: qd: No such file or directory gcc -

[sage-support] Re: bug in permutations?

2007-11-24 Thread David Joyner
Done. A patch was linked to on the trac ticket http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1254 On Oct 28, 2007 1:20 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/28/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please: no printed "deprecated" warnings. Anything would be better > > than

[sage-support] Re: SAGE-2.8.13 released!

2007-11-24 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 24, 5:11 pm, Alexander Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello William and Michael, > > > > > This looks like a 64 bit SuSE 10.1 box - am I correct? > Yes. > > > Also, do you have GMP installed system-wide? It could be > > > some broken weird GMP that confuses the mpfi build > > > scri

[sage-support] Re: SAGE-2.8.13 released!

2007-11-24 Thread Alexander Dreyer
Hello William and Michael, > > > This looks like a 64 bit SuSE 10.1 box - am I correct? Yes. > > Also, do you have GMP installed system-wide? It could be > > some broken weird GMP that confuses the mpfi build > > script. Yes, GMP ist installed systemwide. > Yep, I suspect something similar, but

[sage-support] Re: sage 2.8.13: g0n - cremona.spkg failed to build, 32bit linux, gcc-4.2.2

2007-11-24 Thread Simon King
> Ok, an updated spkg that merges John's changes is at > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/cremona-20071124.spkg > > I had some slight merge conflicts that I did resolve. It builds an > passes doctests on sage.math. Please try this on systems with gcc >

[sage-support] Re: sage 2.8.13: g0n - cremona.spkg failed to build, 32bit linux, gcc-4.2.2

2007-11-24 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
ill upload a patch so this will be fixed soon. > > > John Cremona > > Ok, an updated spkg that merges John's changes is at > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/cremona-20071124.spkg > > I had some slight merge conflicts that I did resolve. It builds an &g