Probably the wiki should be the best place, so I can put it there too.
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Chris Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No problem, where do you want me to add it?
On Apr 6, 8:46 am, Fabio Tonti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool. This could have some place in the
Instead do
./sage -bdist some_name
its available at http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~samuelg/sage/
1. How much RAM?
2 GB (2x 1GB) DDR2 SDRAM 667 MHz
2. What happens if you type
./sage -maxima
*** - invalid byte #xCC in CHARSET:ASCII conversion
The following restarts are available:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Samuel Gaehwiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead do
./sage -bdist some_name
its available at http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~samuelg/sage/
1. How much RAM?
2 GB (2x 1GB) DDR2 SDRAM 667 MHz
2. What happens if you type
./sage -maxima
Could you try making a new clean user account and running
sage -maxima
from it?
Thank you!! On a new user account sage and its maxima worked
beautifully.
On my main account I found a folder called Steuerfälle generated by
a governement-software for calculating the taxes in Switzerland...
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 at 12:58AM -0700, Samuel Gaehwiler wrote:
Thank you very much, William. I'm looking forward to having a great
time with sage. As soon as I'm enough familiar with it I plan to write
an article about opensource math software in the polykum paper,
which is distributed to all
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I did. This is the code developed by people at Simula. It works
nice, but it's quite difficult to install. I generally prefer smaller
tools, if I can get the job done.
Ondrej
Other than size and build issues,
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I did. This is the code developed by people at Simula. It works
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Anders Logg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7 Apr, 16:47, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:15 PM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On
Yes, see here:
http://www.fenics.org/wiki/Download
--
Anders
On 7 Apr, 20:48, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Anders Logg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7 Apr, 16:47, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:15 PM, David Joyner
I'll fix this as it is my code.
Note that this curve has j=0 and the cases of j=0, 1728 were not
implemented with any efficiency (or, it seems correctness), but that I
am half-way through doing that.
In the meantime I'll try to put in a quick patch to correct what's
wrong here. First step,
I have posted a patch for this on trac #2849. The bug would strike
for any curve with j=0 (=1728) defined over GF(3^d) for odd d.
Assuming someone reviews this positively it will get into sage-3.0.
It is also likely that by then there will be much better support for
the cases j=0 and j=1728
Last September I asked how to use SAGE to find the roots of
f = x^(1/9) + (2^(8/9) - 2^(1/9))*(x - 1) - x^(8/9).
William Stein then kindly offered the following code:
sage: RDF = RealDoubleField()
sage: R.y = PolynomialRing(RDF)
sage: # Let y be x^(1/9).
sage: f = y + RDF(2^(8/9) -
Hi,
The issue is that .roots() now returns tuples with the root and its
multiplicity. You can see this if you look at v. You need to select
the 0th entry of the tuple to raise to a power.
sage: RDF = RealDoubleField()
sage: R.y = PolynomialRing(RDF)
sage: # Let y be x^(1/9).
sage: f = y +
Dear Mike,
Thank you very much for your explanation and solution. The amended code
now works perfectly. You made my day!
Best regards,
John
Mike Hansen wrote:
Hi,
The issue is that .roots() now returns tuples with the root and its
multiplicity. You can see this if you look at v. You
Is there a command for SAGE to write an element of a group in terms of
the group's generators?
-Becky
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more
Hi Becky,
Did you have a particular group in mind?
--Mike
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Becky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a command for SAGE to write an element of a group in terms of
the group's generators?
-Becky
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To
I have used the following as a fudge:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enlr=as_qdr=allq=+site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fsagemath.orgbtnG=Search
Dean
---
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The search engine at the bottom of
http://www.sagemath.org/documentation.html
has
In notebook on sagemath.org, the strange behavior reported at the end
of this post occurs with parametric plots. It isn't clear to me
whether this is some mistake of mine in trying to plot complex
parametric curves, or a bug in plot related to previous subscripting
issues. Using C(pi/5,r)
To follow up, I should point out the problem seems to be in
parametric_plot and the pure imaginary points like exp(i*pi/2)
specifically, as
sage: parametric_plot( (real(x*exp(i*pi/2)),imag(x*exp(i*pi/2))),0,10)
causes the same problem, even though
sage:
19 matches
Mail list logo
