On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Chris Seberino cseber...@gmail.com wrote:
What's easiest way to get Sage running on Windows for non-techie
students?
They'll be lost if the instructions are complicated.
Possible to wrap a VMWare + Ubuntu + Sage blob into one big Windows
exe file that
On 10/10/10 11:58 AM, Simon King wrote:
Hi Andrew!
On 10 Okt., 16:58, andrew ewartaewartma...@googlemail.com wrote:
hmm sage doesnt seem to recognise the Im() command
How do you define your polynomials? Are you sure that you *do* define
polynomials?
Examples:
1. This is a polynomial:
On 10/11/10 1:42 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Chris Seberinocseber...@gmail.com wrote:
What's easiest way to get Sage running on Windows for non-techie
students?
They'll be lost if the instructions are complicated.
Possible to wrap a VMWare + Ubuntu + Sage blob
Depending on how technical you are, the easiest way by far is to set
up a Sage server for them yourself, and then all they need on their
windows boxes is a web browser and a password.
I tried this, and I'm pretty techie, but found it was a huge hassle
compared with just letting my students
Dear all,
I'm currently looking at sage-mode for emacs, but fail to find
documentation. C-h m doesn't really reveil much.
(or is there another canonical choice to use sage from within emacs?)
I should add: this is mainly for a course I'm going to give this term...
Thanks,
Martin
--
To post
I just discovered
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8978
does this imply that the binary on sagemath provided for suse 11.1 will
not work on suse 11.2?
Many thanks,
Martin
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:30 AM, A. Jorge Garcia calcp...@aol.com wrote:
Depending on how technical you are, the easiest way by far is to set
up a Sage server for them yourself, and then all they need on their
windows boxes is a web browser and a password.
I tried this, and I'm pretty techie,
On 10/11/2010 02:08 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:30 AM, A. Jorge Garciacalcp...@aol.com wrote:
Depending on how technical you are, the easiest way by far is to set
up a Sage server for them yourself, and then all they need on their
windows boxes is a web browser and a
Hi Martin,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Martin Rubey
martin.ru...@math.uni-hannover.de wrote:
Dear all,
I'm currently looking at sage-mode for emacs, but fail to find
documentation. C-h m doesn't really reveil much.
(or is there another canonical choice to use sage from within emacs?)
Dear sage-support,
Is there a preferred built-in method for invoking elementary symmetric
functions in Sage?
The best that I could turn up was something like the following:
sage: e = SFAElementary(QQ)
sage: e([2]).expand(3)
x0*x1 + x0*x2 + x1*x2
That is very nice, but when I tried to automate
I think the problem is that e([0]) is not defined. This works:
for i in range(1,4):
print(e([i]).expand(3))
x0 + x1 + x2
x0*x1 + x0*x2 + x1*x2
x0*x1*x2
For more advanced answers you might want to ask on the sage-combinat
group.
Cheers,
Marshall Hampton
On Oct 11, 9:24 pm, James Parson
On Oct 11, 10:24 pm, James Parson par...@hood.edu wrote:
Dear sage-support,
Is there a preferred built-in method for invoking elementary symmetric
functions in Sage?
The best that I could turn up was something like the following:
sage: e = SFAElementary(QQ)
sage: e([2]).expand(3)
x0*x1
On Oct 11, 10:50 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
It turns out that Python starts counting at zero. So
sage: range(3)
[0, 1, 2]
So this works.
sage: for i in range(1,4):
e([i]).expand(3)
:
x0 + x1 + x2
x0*x1 + x0*x2 + x1*x2
x0*x1*x2
For something a little more
Hi Nick,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Start with `run-sage' and `sage-send-buffer'. Everything else is gravy :)
I note that sage-mode is up on the Sage wiki [1]. But is there a
repository of sage-mode somewhere that I can fork? Say I want to have
14 matches
Mail list logo
