Hi ,
I have written a function which takes a long time to be run. How can I
make it faster?
def urn(number,k1,delta):
p = list(SetPartitions(number).list()) # set of all partitions
p1 = list(SetPartitions(number,k1).list())
p2 = list(SetPartitions(number,(k1+delta)).list())
I have written a function which takes a long time to be run. How can I
make it faster?
That's an easy one :-)
First, you create very *BIG* objects, and you create them twice each,
because you convert to a list something which is already a list (which
actually copies it).
Why do you do
Sage Folks,
I need to be able to use arbitrary Singular term orders. This showed
up as a Sage bug a couple years ago:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=Dq=http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5326
Do you think this might get fixed soon? I’m running Sage 4.6.2, which
I think is the latest.
I have three polynomials
f=x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - 1
g= x^2+2*y*z
h= (y+z+2*x)^2+2*x^2 -1.
I want to find the common roots in real.
What should be approach in complex?
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On May 15, 6:01 pm, Leon Swinkels leon.swink...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have a multiprocessor ppc64 system that I would like to use as a
sage server. I understand that there is no ready-to-run port for this
and I would be willing to try and construct one. At the moment I run
I keep getting notebooks that are messed up: text and formulas have been
randomly moved around and some are missing. I think this happens when
closing the Sage notebook without either saving or discarding the changes.
I haven't changed any of the default settings. Unfortunately,
On May 15, 9:18 am, MathLynx mathl...@gmail.com wrote:
Both Maple and Mathematica allow the user to move around within plots
- zooming and translating (and rotating in 3-d). Is there any such
functionality with Sage plots? I have already noted that one can use
a mouse to rotate 3-d plots.
Would it be expected behavior for a 26k x 26k sparse array to take more than
two hours to serialize using numpy.savetxt on a modern Apple laptop?
Thanks
Andrew
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Are you suer that savetxt has sparse representations? I bet it's
saving a whole bunch or 0's (though the numpy list would be the place
to ask for sure, and for a replacement).
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:29 AM, akm andrew.mussel...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it be expected behavior for a 26k x 26k
For the record, this was solved by serializing the sparse value dictionary
m.dict()
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
if I have the equation 2*x == 1 , solving for x using solve(2*x==1,x)
returns x == 1/2 . In other words, this equation is satisfied in the
theory of rational (and others that include rational), because there exists
a value x = 1/2 that makes 2*x == 1. But in a different theory, say
Note: I can use SMT solver to solve such problem (though theory of integer
is not decidable in general case). However just want to know if somehow I
can do this in Sage since I don't want to call external SMT.
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To
On May 16, 3:10 pm, tvn nguyenthanh...@gmail.com wrote:
So Is it possible to force x to be in the theory of Integer so that solving
for 2*x == 1 will return Not Possible or something similar ?
If you formulate the problem as finding the integer roots of an
integer polynomial, you get what
Hi,
Here's the code I'm interested in using:
L.c = NumberField(x^3 -2*x +5)
G=L.galois_group(names=b)
x = var('x')
eqn = x^3 - 2*x + 5 == 0
a = solve(eqn, x)[0].rhs()
G.1(a)
This gives an error:
TypeError: -1/2*(I*sqrt(3) + 1)*(1/18*sqrt(3)*sqrt(643) - 5/2)^(1/3) +
1/3*(I*sqrt(3) -
14 matches
Mail list logo
