On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Christophe Bal wrote:
> Thanks. Where all of this I'd implemented ?
Don't worry about it further -- I'll fix the parsing bug that you
found sometime this week. If you find any further bugs anywhere in
cloud.sagemath.com, please don't hesitate to report them! Than
On Monday, November 4, 2013 1:29:10 AM UTC-8, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>
> Isn't it possible to define the quality only in
> terms of the norm and the integer radical,
> something like this:
>
> q(a,b,c) = max( norm(a),norm(b),norm(c) ) /
>(log(Delta(K)) + degree(K) * log(radical(norm
Thanks. Where all of this I'd implemented ?
Le 4 nov. 2013 15:20, "William Stein" a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Christophe Bal
> wrote:
> > Indeed there are small security problems and big ones. The use of eval or
> > exec can cause real big problems. I'll try to show that in priva
On Monday, November 4, 2013 1:29:10 AM UTC-8, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:51:15AM -0800, Nils Bruin wrote:
> > On Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:36:35 AM UTC-8, John Cremona wrote:
> > >
> > > The function is called global_height():
> > >
> > > sage: K. = NumberField(x^
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Christophe Bal wrote:
> Indeed there are small security problems and big ones. The use of eval or
> exec can cause real big problems. I'll try to show that in private. Not
> here... I'm not sure to do such a hack but if the actual version uses exec
> or eval, it wou
Indeed there are small security problems and big ones. The use of eval or
exec can cause real big problems. I'll try to show that in private. Not
here... I'm not sure to do such a hack but if the actual version uses exec
or eval, it would be possible.
My remark is just to help and not to criticize
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:51:15AM -0800, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:36:35 AM UTC-8, John Cremona wrote:
> >
> > The function is called global_height():
> >
> > sage: K. = NumberField(x^3-2)
> > sage: b = a+1
> > sage: b.global_height()
> > 0.366204096222703
> >
> > John
On Sunday, November 3, 2013 11:19:45 PM UTC-8, projetmbc wrote:
>
> The use of AST is a pretty way BUT you must not use *eval* or *exec*because
> of real security issues. It's easy to find explanations about that
> on the web.
>
If you read these explanations, you'll see that by the same logic,
