Re: [sage-support] Re: Noticed in sage 6.4rc1 : sage_mode broken

2014-11-14 Thread kcrisman
However, plot(sin,[x,-2*pi,2*pi],figsize=4).show() woks as advertised. This seems to be bound to recent changes in the management of display modes for the new ipython needs. Oh yes. You might want to see http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17170 for some possible ideas on how to fix it,

[sage-support] PB with sr.mq module

2014-11-14 Thread myshell . dubois
Hi, I'm working with Sage 6.3 on a macbook pro with OSX10.8.5. When I use some function of the module sr.mq (http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/cryptography/sage/crypto/mq/sr.html), I have a bug: sage: sr = mq.SR(1,1,1,4, gf2=True, polybori=True) sage: K = sr.base_ring() sage: K Finite

[sage-support] Re: Solving symbolic inequalities does not always yield explicit solutions.

2014-11-14 Thread shersonb
Oh, yes, this is on openSUSE 13.1 on AMD FX(tm)-8320 Eight-Core Processor, Sage Version 6.3, Release Date: 2014-08-10. On Thursday, November 13, 2014 11:16:58 PM UTC-8, shersonb wrote: Hello~ I am attempting to write a script in which I would like sage to solve some symbolic inequalities

[sage-support] Re: Bug in symbolic integral

2014-11-14 Thread Peter Bruin
Hello, This appears to be a bug in the evaluation of the incomplete Gamma function in the older PARI version(s) used by Sage up to and including 6.3. The computation is correct in the newly released Sage 6.4, which uses the recent stable PARI release 2.7.1. (See also

Re: [sage-support] PB with sr.mq module

2014-11-14 Thread Martin Albrecht
Works for me: sage: sr = mq.SR(1,1,1,4, gf2=True, polybori=True) sage: K = sr.base_ring() sage: a = K.gen() sage: K = [a] sage: P = [1] sage: F,s = sr.polynomial_system(P=P, K=K) sage: F.groebner_basis() [k100, k101 + 1, k102, k103 + k003, x100 + 1, x101 + k003 + 1, x102 + k003 + 1, x103 + k003,