Re: [sage-support] Re: Groebner bases for supercommutative polynomial algebras.

2020-11-29 Thread 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support
On Nov 29, Simon King wrote: Hi Reimundo, On 2020-11-29, 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support wrote: Well, in the Noetherian case this works fine. The setup I need is a non-noetherian algebra: a polynomial differential algebra, that is polynomials in x_1,...,x_n and all of their formal

Re: [sage-support] Re: Groebner bases for supercommutative polynomial algebras.

2020-11-29 Thread 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support
On Nov 29, Simon King wrote: Hi Reimundo, On 2020-06-17, 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support wrote: Is there an implementation of such a thing as in the title? TL;DR: Yes. Singular does have these capabilities. I recall that these were comfortably wrapped in SageMath, but as it turns out

Re: [sage-support] log to the base 2

2020-07-18 Thread 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support
On Jul 18, Michael Beeson wrote: sage: n(log(2,408/370)) 7.08999206263157 sage: log(2,2) 1 sage: 2^7 128 sage: n(log(2,408.0/370)) 7.08999206263157 sage: version() 'SageMath version 8.7, Release Date: 2019-03-23' sage: n(log(2,1.001)) 693.493696416899 sage:log(2,1)  gives an error

Re: [sage-support] speakers of FR/PT/ES/JP sought to check edits in src/doc on #30076

2020-07-07 Thread 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support
On Jul 07, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 2:27 PM 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support wrote: On Jul 07, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:58 PM 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support > wrote: >> >> On Jul 07, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >On T

Re: [sage-support] speakers of FR/PT/ES/JP sought to check edits in src/doc on #30076

2020-07-07 Thread 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support
On Jul 07, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:58 PM 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support wrote: On Jul 07, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:02 PM 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support > wrote: >> >> Hi Dima, "Interfaz" doesn't have an a

Re: [sage-support] speakers of FR/PT/ES/JP sought to check edits in src/doc on #30076

2020-07-07 Thread 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support
On Jul 07, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:02 PM 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support wrote: Hi Dima, "Interfaz" doesn't have an accent in Spanish https://dle.rae.es/interfaz Thanks! It was actually already in the file. Care to check the complete t

Re: [sage-support] speakers of FR/PT/ES/JP sought to check edits in src/doc on #30076

2020-07-07 Thread 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support
Hi Dima, "Interfaz" doesn't have an accent in Spanish https://dle.rae.es/interfaz Cheers, R. On Jul 07, Dima Pasechnik wrote: The ticket https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30076 does few changes to docs to remove information on to be removed in 9.1 sagenb and its worksheets (sws format).

[sage-support] number of threads with sage -b

2020-07-04 Thread 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support
Is there a way of requesting a number of threads with 'sage -b'? something like MAKE='make -j7' sage -b? Cheers, R. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

[sage-support] Groebner bases for supercommutative polynomial algebras.

2020-06-17 Thread 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support
Is there an implementation of such a thing as in the title? I am facing the following design problem, and I'd love to get some pointers. I have a category of parents that are infinite dimensional super algebras but are graded with finite dimensional graded pieces. For the sake of clarity think

[sage-support] patchbot frequent "Temporary failure in name resolution"

2020-05-15 Thread 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support
I have been trying to set up sage-patchbot but I am running into a problem. Quite often (but not always and I cannot discern when) it fails with a urllib.error.URLError: So for example today it checked base and then failed in the first ticket. Yesterday, it failed even when checking base.

Re: [sage-support] building docs with sphinx-1.8.5 fails with existing _static

2020-04-23 Thread 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support
HCTp_pU/12BWV897AgAJ Related: https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/7407 Best regards, Jean-Florent. Le 23/04/2020 à 13:20, 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support a écrit : Hello, I posted this on ask.sagemath.org https://ask.sagemath.org/question/50925/building-docs-with-sphinx-185/ On my o

[sage-support] building docs with sphinx-1.8.5 fails with existing _static

2020-04-23 Thread 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-support
Hello, I posted this on ask.sagemath.org https://ask.sagemath.org/question/50925/building-docs-with-sphinx-185/ On my own git branch, after the last pull I hit this error on "sage --docbuild refernce html" even after a "make doc-clean". This looks like what's described in this ticket