Here is another way:
sage: coeffs = [[i^2-j for j in range(6)] for i in range(6)]
sage: matrix(coeffs)
[ 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5]
[ 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4]
[ 4 3 2 1 0 -1]
[ 9 8 7 6 5 4]
[16 15 14 13 12 11]
[25 24 23 22 21 20]
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Alasdair amc...@gmail.com wrote:
This
I don't know, but I'm ccing sage-support just in case
someone there knows.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:16 AM, marius_darie dariemar...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
How to use loop for iteration to draw many inputbox (interact).
I do not want use input_grid because just one label is accepted for
Did you also try discrete_log(a,b)?
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:03 AM, yujia chiu woodc...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I tried to compute the logarithm of b based a in a finite field. But it
seemed that the b.log(a) command in sage only works when a generates the
multiplicative group of the
Type RealField? to read the instrucitons.
I think it is RealField(sci_not=True) or something like that.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Oscar Castillo-Felisola
o.castillo.felis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody!
I'd like to know if there is a way of say Sage to return a result in
scientific
Does
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6648
help?
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:06 PM, davidp dav...@reed.edu wrote:
For a class I am teaching, I would like to display an image in the
plane---say a png-file--- and show how it is transformed under a
complex function f: C -- C. What is the
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Dana Ernst dcer...@plymouth.edu wrote:
Is there a way to obtain a subgroup lattice for finite groups? I defined a
finite group G and did G.? tab but didn't see anything that would do this.
Any tips?
One way:
sage: G = SymmetricGroup(3)
sage: GG = gap(G)
Is
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6648
related to what you want?
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Adrián rhsol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I was just wondering if Sage has any function implemented to do
conformal mappings?
Or better yet, is there a way in which I can do some conformal
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Hi David!
On 1 Mrz., 20:08, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Dana Ernst dcer...@plymouth.edu wrote:
Is there a way to obtain a subgroup lattice for finite groups? I defined
, 12, None), (4, 9,
None), (5, 6, None), (6, 11, None), (7, 8, None), (12, 13, None)]
sage: G.girth()
6
sage: TG.girth()
6
This has the circuit 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 - 12 - 13 - 0 of length 6.
I'd like to know if there is an easy way to get Sage to
return the corresponding list of edges.
- David Joyner
(P))]
return cycle
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:42 AM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi:
I'm trying to compute fundamental circuits of a
graph in Sage and am getting stuck. Is this implemented?
Here is an example:
sage: G = graphs.HeawoodGraph()
sage: TG = G.subgraph(edges
[i+1])
cycle = cycle+[e for e in E1 if e in E2]
return cycle
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:44 AM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll answer my own question:-)
There is an easily written function which does this:
...
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:42 AM, David Joyner wdjoy
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
By the fundamental circuits, do you mean a base of the Cycle space ?
If so, I have to admit I do not know how to do it...
I just posted some code to compute the cycle space to
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Sam'l B sa...@samlb.ws wrote:
Can anyone point me to the part of the Fine Manual which describes
how to set up Sage to let users not on the Sage server access via HTTP (I.e.
'http://192.168.1.99:8000') ? ?
I think it is easier if you just type notebook?
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Walking Randomly
michael.p.crouc...@googlemail.com wrote:
Regarding namespace pollution. Mathematica has thousands of function
names in it's global namespace but it never causes programmers a
problem because they have a convention. All mathematica functions
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:06 PM, zsharon zacherysha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking at convolution products of Lebesgue integrable functions,
and to get a better visualization, I want to compute some convolutions
of indicator functions.
So, want to have a function f:R-R defined by
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:08 PM, zsharon zacherysha...@gmail.com wrote:
But convolutions are already implemented for functions in the Piecewise
class. Is there a problem you were having with that?
The only convolution I found in the reference manual is for lists
only. Can you link me to a
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 12:30 PM, zieglerk konstantin.zieg...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using sage from the command line (or more precisely through emacs
sagemode).
Let me ask the opposite question: How can I allocate *more* memory to
the sage process. Sometimes extensive calculations break of
I personally don't see how off the top of my head, but if
you figure out a way to do it, please post it!
Maybe reading to source code of Piecewise and/or contour_plot
might help?
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Eugene Goldberg omegat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I've got a few functions like
Sorry, I don't know.
But I'm cc'ing the sage-support list, whichmight have more people who
know more about Sage's functionality for doing probability and
statistic computations.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:09 PM, michel paul mpaul...@gmail.com wrote:
Next week we start probability, and I'm
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Thomas Scofield scofi...@calvin.edu wrote:
To what does #7872 refer? And is that a reply to O. Lazo, or to my post?
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7872
On Jan 26, 2010, at 2:56 AM, William Cauchois wrote:
Check out #7872, Jason!
On Jan 23,
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:59 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
For instance, only the time independent problems in quantum mechanics
can be solved with Sage and therefore one needs to find an alternative
to Sage to solve (numerically) the time dependent problems. This is a
limitation
I agree this is not a well-defined question but the questioner may
want to look at
http://www.gap-system.org/Manuals/doc/htm/tut/CHAP005.htm#SECT004 .
I also suggest starting with smaller groups to begin with, if possible,
to test out things.
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Alex Ghitza
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Christian Szegedy
christian.szeg...@gmail.com wrote:
Not an answer, but a side question (probably belongs to sage-devel, anyhow...)
Why would you use BDDs in the first place?
For almost any applications, SAT-solvers beat BDDs by large margins,
and also have
version? (may be I
should use older version of sage)
On 8 дек, 21:47, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, the piecewise class was written before the symbolic
expressions class and has not kept pace.
The obvious solution produced this:
sage: signal = Piecewise([[(0,1
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 8:05 AM, kcrisman wrote:
I don't get why people can't unsubscribe themselves?
They can. This is footer is wrong:
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To
Unfortunately, the piecewise class was written before the symbolic
expressions class and has not kept pace.
The obvious solution produced this:
sage: signal = Piecewise([[(0,1), cos(2*pi*1*x)], [(-1, 0), 0*x]])
sage: signal.integral(definite=True)
Nassau Community College
-Original Message-
From: David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com
To: sage-support@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, Nov 14, 2009 11:03 am
Subject: [sage-support] Re: Server Wars!
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:52 AM, calcp...@aol.com wrote:
BTW, I currently have 3 Linux
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:52 AM, calcp...@aol.com wrote:
BTW, I currently have 3 Linux servers at school. One is an ftp server
to share files with my students. Another is an sftp server where my
students can login to save their work. And another is down right now
and was an apache
transforms don't solve non linear ode's. Sorry :p
On Nov 11, 12:01 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Jaasiel Ornelas jrodri1...@gmail.com
wrote:
I can't get desolve_laplace to give me a good output. I had already
tried the regular solve (desolve
There may be others but here is one:
1. Go to http://www.sagenb.org/ with your browser
(firefox is recommended).
2. Register for a new account (if you don't have one already).
3. Sign in.
4. Click on New worksheet.
5. Title your worksheet GAP something or other.
6. On the 4th drop down menu near
I posted a new version of the braid package at
http://www.opensourcemath.org/braid/
If you extract it in sage*/local/lib/gap*/pkg and then start GAP
by sage -gap, then it loads using
gap LoadPackage(braid);
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Adam Sorkin azsor...@hotmail.com wrote:
I am trying
Okay. Here is what will work.
The package loading mechanism has changed so my quick hack
to create a package from Maagard et al's files will not work
now. I'll try to fix it eventually when I have time...
1. Download and extract Maagard's tarball anywhere, say to
/Users/me/gapfiles/braid
(so
Does this help?
sage: f = maxima(x^2-1)
sage: type(f)
class 'sage.interfaces.maxima.MaximaElement'
sage: ff = f.sage()
sage: type(ff)
type 'sage.symbolic.expression.Expression'
sage: ff.factor()
(x - 1)*(x + 1)
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Mikie thephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote:
Is
Do you mean this?
sage: f = x^2+1
sage: f(x=2)
5
sage: f(2)
/Users/wdj/sagefiles/sage-4.1.2.rc2/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/IPython/iplib.py:2073:
DeprecationWarning: Substitution using function-call syntax and
unnamed arguments is deprecated and will be removed from a future
release of
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 3:05 PM, yotama9 yota...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I have several files of data that I want to merge into a single array
and then manipulate it (adding a single column to all the column
etc.)
Each file is constructed of two columns. I want to take the columns of
the
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 5:56 PM, calcp...@aol.com wrote:
OK, what does sharing mean then? And how do I publish a worksheet
instead?
Sharing is if yo want to share with a particular user on the server.
For example, I have my students work out a Sage exercise and, instead of
printing it out
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
David Joyner wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 5:56 PM, calcp...@aol.com wrote:
OK, what does sharing mean then? And how do I publish a worksheet
instead?
Sharing is if yo want to share with a particular user
Its exact, so you can do this:
sage: x = var(x)
sage: y = function(y,x)
sage: M = x-y
sage: N = -x+y^2
sage: desolve(diff(y,x)==-M/N,y)
1/2*x^2 + 1/3*y(x)^3 - x*y(x) == c
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
I'm writing a worksheet for calc 3, and
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Jason Grout wrote:
I'll probably just write a short function to do that, based on the
algorithm the students have seen. It's probably good for them that way
anyway.
So I did this now:
One last post on this
I have a windows XP dell mini at work and sage runs fine as a vmware
application.
The 3d plotting is a bit slow though.
I'll try out the new virtualbox image when I get a chance.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Daniel Harris
mail.dhar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello
I have just bought some
Done
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Afonso Henriques Slva Leite
afonsole...@ymail.com wrote:
But I can't unsubscribe using the email provided in the messages! Please
unsubscribe me!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:55 AM, all_thumbs sch...@hsva.de wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Jul 22, 12:56 am, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I'm not sure what you are going to do with yourfunction.
If it is just for plotting, say, I think you might just want to use
def f(x,y
, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
What type of module? Sage contains GAP, which might do what you want
http://www.gap-system.org/Manuals/doc/htm/ref/chapters.htm
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:32 AM, adam mohamed
adam.hariv...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Is it possible to compute
know the generators of the modules but I am not sure how to describe it as
a Meataxe module.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:52 PM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you describe it as a Meataxe module?
http://www.gap-system.org/Manuals/doc/htm/ref/CHAP067.htm
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:04
We generally reject such membership requests as they are assumed to be
spammers. Sorry for the inconvenience.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:02 AM, domingo.sala...@syngenta.com wrote:
Dear Colleague,
I requested to become a member of the SAGE support group but I have not been
contacted about
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:45 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
...
Still do not understand the problem related to desolve_laplace
Should only the way how to define variables been fixed? Or should be
fixed the fact, that the equation is expected as lambda expression?
The
This is a known bug. Marshall and I tried to fix it during a SageDays in
Seattle but failed to figure out the magic in Robert Bradshaw's code
for desolve. I think it is easy to fix for those who know how to fix it
easily, but that rules me out:-)
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 3:30 AM,
I guess you are using a mac, but can you tell us what version the OS is and
what version of Sage you are running? Is it a binary, for example?
(This might help others on the list diagnose the problem.)
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Swanhild Bernstein
swanhild.bernst...@math.tu-freiberg.de
You could try
x,y = var(x,y)
dy_dxB(x,y) = cos(x) - sin(x) - y
eulers_method(dy_dxB,0,2,0.1,3)
but I don't know why Sage will not evaluate the cos and
sin terms, so you end up with a long messy hybrid
symbolic/numberical expression.
If you use instead
eulers_method(dy_dxB,0,2,0.1,3,
Just a guess: your system is non-linear and that causes a problem somehow.
If you modify the linear terms you get
sage: t = var('t')
sage: z = function('z',t)
sage: y1= function('y1',t)
sage: y2= function('y2',t)
sage:
sage: b = 3/100; r1 = 6; r2 = 1/2; gamma = 1/100; ro = 6;
sage: De1 =
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Sometimes it helps to read the (GAP) manual...
I found that GAP offers the possibility to log input, output, or both.
So, simply I start my computations with gap.eval('LogTo(gaplog)'),
and then all input (including
I don't use R but just googled for your question and found
this was asked about 2 years ago:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/d920f1ba1f28aa44
Hopefully that is still relevant.
You might also find something of interest in this thread:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Kjetil Halvorsen kjetil1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hola!
¿Is there something in Sage for Lie groups and algebras?
There is the GAP stuff, lots of native stuff (use the search bar on the
main Sage webpage), and lie is an optional package. What is it that you want?
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi kcrisman,
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 2:24 AM, kcrismankcris...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
works fine. What am I doing wrong? And can someone add documentation
about the exact syntax, if not?
I have written some
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Afonso Henriques Silva
Leiteafonsole...@ymail.com wrote:
I downloaded sage-4.1.1-linux-Ubuntu_9.04-i686-Linux.tar.gz to my
desktop and untar it there. My experience with linux is a little
limited.
...
I need a lot more information than these read me files...
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Simon Kingsimon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Hi Minh,
On Aug 29, 12:32 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
And we do this: a one not an one, even though one starts with a
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 8:11 AM, wol...@gmail.com wrote:
...
For numbers, it could be problematic for those starting with 1:
a 1, an 11 (an eleven), a 111 (a one hundred ... ), a (a one
thousand ...), an 1 (an eleven thousand ...).
You're right, I hadn't thought of that case.
Hi:
There is a fairly polished book on differential calculus and Sage
now available at amazon.com
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1448662192/ref=pe_5050_12929060_snp_dp
(Hope that url works for others - if not just search amazon for the title.)
All royalties go directly to the Sage Foundation.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
...
Your book has been added to the publications page. Please see
http://www.sagemath.org/library/publications.html
under the section Books mentioning Sage.
Thanks! Can it also be added to
This was asked and discussed in a thread called [sage-support] Using
Sage on Windows
back in October 2008. You can search the archives for it. Hope that helps.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 5:47 AM, EHFhesamif...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I can't attach file in vmware sage under windows, help me.
thanx
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Simon Kingsimon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
...
But, alas, sage.numerical.optimize.minimize_constrained fails to work
if f is defined like this.
Possible, but not nice, seems
sage: f = x*y
sage: a = sage.numerical.optimize.minimize_constrained(f,[(1,10),
Perhaps you could convert this into a system of linear equations then
use the solve command?
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Santanu
Sarkarsarkar.santanu@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
How can I find the solution x1,...,z3 in SAGE where
A= [x1,x2,x3,
y1,y2,y3,
z1,z2,z3] is a
The answer really depends on if your server is on an intranet LAN
(inaccessible from
the rest of the world) or on a (public) internet web server. In the
former case, the answer
is very easy and even I can answer your question!
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 9:49 AM, John Cremonajohn.crem...@gmail.com
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Simon Kingsimon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Hi sage-supporters!
I think Jeff's question below deserves an answer (and I don't know an
answer myself).
Since it is still without a reply and disappeared from the screen, I
thought I bring it up again. I hope you
One option is to try to use the ode.pyx wrapper to the gsl library
http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-main/file/285a89ed5dc7/sage/gsl/ode.pyx#l1
Another is to try to precompute the hessian and pass it into your
program as an argument. This way your program does not call
maxima (assuming that is the
/sage_trac/ticket/371
On 11 août, 16:04, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
One option is to try to use the ode.pyx wrapper to the gsl
libraryhttp://hg.sagemath.org/sage-main/file/285a89ed5dc7/sage/gsl/ode.pyx#l1
Another is to try to precompute the hessian and pass it into your
program
it a little bit and introduced a footer to that page. Font
is bigger, too.
H
On Aug 8, 3:48 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Done.
BTW, I noticed that the download link sends one to a page
for a mac binary but there is no binary on that page,
only a README.txt file
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:29 PM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Harald Schillyharald.schi...@gmail.com
wrote:
i would like to know what was the reason why you
Done.
BTW, I noticed that the download link sends one to a page
for a mac binary but there is no binary on that page,
only a README.txt file. Is that intentional?
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 1:41 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
If you're an OS X user of Sage, and want to spend a few
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Offray,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Offray Vladimir Luna
Cárdenasoffray.l...@javeriana.edu.co wrote:
Hi,
Two students are interested in making the graph of the black body[1][2]
with Sage and making it
Read the bottom of the email you just posted (or any other email posted
to the group). It says:
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Craig Pellegrinicp...@uic.edu wrote:
Hi,
How can I unsubscribe from
I don't understand the question. Do you want a contour plot? An implicit plot?
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:30 AM, surfermailingslis...@googlemail.com wrote:
sage: density_plot(f, (0,1), (0,1))
looks like an adequate visualization in 2d.
thanks it looks pretty, but i would like to have a
I think this is with y = 1/4:
sage: h = Piecewise([[(0,1/4),3*x/4],[(1/4,1),(1-x)/4]])
sage: h.plot()
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:45 PM, surfermailingslis...@googlemail.com wrote:
sorry, I would like to obtain the curve for fixed x in (0,1). (or for fixed
y in (0,1)).
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Dougmcke...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you aware of the function piecewise(), which seems to do what you
want? If there is a problem with using it, what is it?
I wasn't aware of piecewise(), and although it doesn't seem as elegant
or flexible as being able to use
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Dougmcke...@gmail.com wrote:
Piecewise functions of 2 variables are not yet implemented.
Sorry.
Ah, I see. If there was were primitive functions for LessThan(x,y),
Equal(x,y), and GreaterThan(x,y), and they returned 0 or 1, I think
that's all I would need:
kdeinit4: preparing to launch /opt/kde3/bin/kdvi
sage: kbuildsycoca running...
QApplication::notify: Unexpected null receiver
I wonder whether David Joyner (see his response above in this thread)
was running sage 4.1 when he tried my example. Or maybe or kdvi is
different versions?
Yes, I
Does this help any?
sage: R = PolynomialRing(QQ, 2, 'x1,x2', order='lp')
sage: x1,x2 = R.gens()
sage: f1 = 1/2*((x1^2 + 2*x1 - 4)*x2^2 + 2*(x1^2 + x1)*x2 + x1^2)
sage: f2 = 1/2*((x1^2 + 2*x1 + 1)*x2^2 + 2*(x1^2 + x1)*x2 - 4*x1^2)
sage: I = (f1,f2)*R; I
Ideal (1/2*x1^2*x2^2 + x1^2*x2 + 1/2*x1^2 +
I don't think this is implemented yet in Sage.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:55 AM, arun Muktibodhamukti2...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to test the limits order of nilpotency class of certain infinite
groups. How should I go about it? Please help.
Thanking you in advance.
Arun
India
--
Arun
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:37 AM, mac8090bonzerpot...@hotmail.com wrote:
For a given k, is it possible to instantly get an k-th root of unity
in sage without making extra fields, or by using e^(2*pi*I/k)?
I'm a bit confused by your question. If you mean k-th roots of unity in
the complex
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Alasdairamc...@gmail.com wrote:
Of these two examples:
m(x)=mod(x,10)
m=lambda x:mod(x,10)
The first returns an error unable to convert x (=x) to an integer.
Can anyone explain what's going on here?
I think the first tries to use Sage's symbolic
, but of you can modify the code to
give you what you want.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:50 AM, David Sevillasevil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Jun 25, 9:12 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
I know multiplication is very finicky. You might try using
R.t = PolynomialRing(RR, t) instead, but I'm
I know multiplication is very finicky. You might try using
R.t = PolynomialRing(RR, t) instead, but I'm not sure that will work either.
Can you post more of your code so I can give a more detailed answer?
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:17 PM, David Sevillasevil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am
Can you tell me what version you are using?
In version 4.0.2.rc3, I get
sage: C=LinearCode(Matrix(GF(2),[1,0,1,1,0,1]))
sage: C
Linear code of length 6, dimension 1 over Finite Field of size 2
sage: C.minimum_distance()
4
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Rado rki...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Cool!
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Mikiethephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have my API running on a host. Not real pretty yet, but it seems to
work.
Please, test.
http://pirsqrt.com:7316
Thanx
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send
Is this what you mean?
sage: R.x = PolynomialRing(ZZ,x)
sage: f = 2*x**2-x
sage: f.factor()
x * (2*x - 1)
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Mikiethephantom6...@hotmail.com wrote:
When I use Sage to factor lets say 2*x**2-x it factors the 2 out and
leaves a fraction in the expression. I
Maurizio:
I'm not sure when you created http://wiki.sagemath.org/Unit%20of%20Measurement
but a secret question has been added to the wiki which you have to
answer for each
edit. The answer to the question is (hopefully) pretty obvious. I
think the question
appears near the top of the page after
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:01 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Mauriziomaurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Anyway, I updated the wiki page since I successfully installed Unum in
SAGE. You can see the (pretty encouraging) results there:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Mauriziomaurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
...
All the other people involved, and interested in a unit package,
please show just to say hi
I'm interested in something for teaching (so very basic is sufficient)
say calculus /ODEs (eg, using DEs to solve a
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:33 AM, evlu...@gmail.comevlu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working on some code that is very computationally intensive. I'm
pretty sure my algorithm is good, but I know that tiny differences in
wording in sage can make a huge runtime difference. Is there any site/
I'm forwarding this email from Michael Somos to sage-support.
The items about the Galois fields database being broken
are in the 4.0.1.a0 version of the installation manual.
Can anyone on this list determine if a track ticket should be opened
for this issue?
-- Forwarded message
I'm not sure if this helps, but you can create a polynomial
of the type you want a bit simpler:
sage: var(x,y)
(x, y)
sage: Inds = CartesianProduct(range(5), range(4))
sage: sum([var(a+str(i)+str(j))*x^i*y^j for i,j in Inds])
a43*x^4*y^3 + a33*x^3*y^3 + a42*x^4*y^2 + a23*x^2*y^3 + a32*x^3*y^2 +
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:38 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 3, 12:16 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
What about having a experiment mode in Sage that turns on things like
this? Some variable in some module somewhere that people can set to
switch
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:54 PM, James Parson par...@hood.edu wrote:
Thanks to David Joyner for his response to my original question. His
method worked nicely. Incidentally, here is the original Maple code
from the lecture of Doron Zeilberger that I was trying to translate
into Sage:
BTW I
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:20 PM, James Parson par...@hood.edu wrote:
Here is a variant on the original question: suppose I wanted to write
a line that creates a polynomial ring whose variables are a_{ij} for i
+j=d. How should I do it? I might want to set this up, for example,
sage: Inds
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Alasdair amc...@gmail.com wrote:
You use solve_rec like this:
maxima.load('solve_rec')
maxima('solve_rec(f[n+2]-3*f[n+1]+2*f[n]=2^n,f[n],f[0]=1,f[1]=0)')
Also, see
You might be looking for the attach command:
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/tutorial/programming.html
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Kurda Yon kurda...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all,
is it possible to write a file with a sage program (a set of sage
command) and then execute the program?
I tried
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Kim, In-Jae in-jae@mnsu.edu wrote:
Can I get some help on this memory issue in Ubuntu to download sage 3.4.2?
I am a beginner of Linux/Ubuntu, and have no idea where I should look at.
Maybe you can google resizing partitions in ubuntu (without the quotes)
done
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:01 PM, tony glaser glase...@yahoo.com wrote:
Unsubscribe
Unsubscribe address not working. Please remove me.
Tony Glaser
613.808.8413
www.technicallytony.com
--- On Sat, 5/16/09, Paul Sargent psa...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Paul Sargent psa...@gmail.com
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:36 AM, simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Dear Jim,
On May 15, 4:03 am, jimfar jamesfar...@mac.com wrote:
Thanks, I was confusing myself with the definition of the order of an
element with order of the cycle.
Are you really confusing it?
As much as I understood,
I must be missing something. Why can't you just check the order of the element?
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:53 PM, jimfar jamesfar...@mac.com wrote:
I can generate a list from any given group, but how would I go about
generating a list of just 3 or 5 cycles?
301 - 400 of 761 matches
Mail list logo
