On Monday 18 March 2024 at 06:45:17 UTC-7 Hellen Colman wrote:
"A graph represents an *antisymmetric relation* if ... "
It is not saying a graph is antisymmetric, but is introducing a new
definition of antisymmetric relation.
Ah, indeed! The person must have been interested in transitive
Yes, sounds good.
On Monday, March 18, 2024 at 9:07:52 AM UTC-5 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Hellen,
>
> On Monday, March 18, 2024 at 1:45:17 PM UTC Hellen Colman wrote:
>
> Yes, that terminology is not perfectly aligned between different areas in
> mathematics is a good takeaway we will definitely
Hellen,
On Monday, March 18, 2024 at 1:45:17 PM UTC Hellen Colman wrote:
Yes, that terminology is not perfectly aligned between different areas in
mathematics is a good takeaway we will definitely mention in the book.
Thank you!
In this case I understand that we are checking antisymmetric in
Nils,
Yes, that terminology is not perfectly aligned between different areas in
mathematics is a good takeaway we will definitely mention in the book.
Thank you!
In this case I understand that we are checking antisymmetric in a graph,
but the most confusing part is that the documentation is
This is now https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/37618
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 12:42 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Dear Hellen, dear Nils,
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:51 PM Nils Bruin wrote:
>
>> On Friday 15 March 2024 at 15:08:34 UTC-7 Hellen Colman wrote:
>>
>> Let me just clarify the
Dear Hellen, dear Nils,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:51 PM Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Friday 15 March 2024 at 15:08:34 UTC-7 Hellen Colman wrote:
>
> Let me just clarify the main point of his question just in case we can
> still obtain a helpful answer. Essentially the question is: Why is Sage
>
On Friday 15 March 2024 at 15:08:34 UTC-7 Hellen Colman wrote:
Let me just clarify the main point of his question just in case we can
still obtain a helpful answer. Essentially the question is: Why is Sage
calling "antisymmetric" to a property that is not the standard
antisymmetric property?
Dima,
Thank you for taking the time to answer the question posted by my student
Samuel.
Let me just clarify the main point of his question just in case we can
still obtain a helpful answer. Essentially the question is: Why is Sage
calling "antisymmetric" to a property that is not the
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 9:24 PM Samuel Lubliner
wrote:
> I've been exploring the concept of antisymmetry in DiGraphs within
> SageMath and noticed a discrepancy between the standard mathematical
> definition of an antisymmetric relation and SageMath's implementation for
> DiGraphs. I'm looking
I've been exploring the concept of antisymmetry in DiGraphs within SageMath
and noticed a discrepancy between the standard mathematical definition of
an antisymmetric relation and SageMath's implementation for DiGraphs. I'm
looking for some clarification or insight into this observation.
The
10 matches
Mail list logo
