On Aug 23, 8:54 am, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
1. If you write a little program on the command line and it does
something, but simply it doesn't do the right thing or you get strange
error messages about missing attributes -- it would be very hard to
find out that you forgot
On 8/24/10 11:45 AM, Oscar Lazo wrote:
On Aug 23, 8:54 am, Simon Kingsimon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
1. If you write a little program on the command line and it does
something, but simply it doesn't do the right thing or you get strange
error messages about missing attributes -- it would be
Hello everybody
implicit_multiplication is very time-saving, and a much more natural way
to write things. I'd love it to be default.
Wow, implicit_multiplication(True) is *exactly* what I have been looking for.
I have tried it just now, and it is brill.
OK, my question: Now that I know
Hi Robin,
On 23 Aug., 12:58, robin hankin hankin.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
But, if I didn't know it existed, how could I possibly have found it?
(give me a pointer to a FAQ!)
I just tried to find it in the FAQ, but without success.
Anyway. If you know that it is called implicit_multiplication
Hello
thanks for this. I liked the preparser manpage that Simon pointed me to.
Re automatic_names(): why isn't this the default?
Now I know it exists, I think I'll probably use it all the time.
Who uses sage without this option?
Or, more precisely, can anyone give me an example of a way
of
Hi Robin,
On 23 Aug., 13:43, robin hankin hankin.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Re automatic_names(): why isn't this the default?
Now I know it exists, I think I'll probably use it all the time.
Who uses sage without this option?
I find automatic_names horrible, to say the least! In my opinion,
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 23 Aug., 13:43, robin hankin hankin.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Re automatic_names(): why isn't this the default?
Now I know it exists, I think I'll probably use it all the time.
Who uses sage without this
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 23 Aug., 13:43, robin hankin hankin.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Re automatic_names(): why isn't this the default?
Now I
Hi Robert,
On 23 Aug., 18:08, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
... And on the other hand, I can't see how life with Sage would be
any easier if automatic_names was the standard.
Think about someone working through a series of calculus textbook
exercises (mostly
Great! thank you!
On Aug 21, 11:50 am, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Oscar Lazo estadisticame...@gmail.com
wrote:
implicit_multiplication is very time-saving, and a much more natural way to
write things. I'd love it to be default.
In your
Hi Oscar,
Could you tell us a little more about what fails when you try
ask.sagemath.org? Do you get any error message? At least one tag is
required for every question, so did you include a tag?
thanks,
Niles
On Aug 21, 12:31 pm, Oscar Lazo estadisticame...@gmail.com wrote:
I have posted a new question now. My impression is that the problem
was related to my GoogleID authentification, since I was working with
two ID's at the time.
On Aug 21, 1:21 pm, Niles nil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Oscar,
Could you tell us a little more about what fails when you try
I have now found out about the automatic_names option, that makes
variables be automatically declared.
Unfortunately this is not available in the command line, so editing
~/.sage/init.sage will not work. Can this too be set as a default?
thanks
Oscar
On Aug 21, 5:56 pm, Oscar Lazo
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Oscar Lazo estadisticame...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately this is not available in the command line, so editing
~/.sage/init.sage will not work. Can this too be set as a default?
You can add the following to your init.sage:
from sagenb.misc.support import
14 matches
Mail list logo
