Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> * predefining a bunch of colors in the global namespace (maybe just
>> what
>> is available in the current strings?)
>
> I like all your comments but this one--the global namespace is huge
> enough as it is. Also, colors.* gives nice tab completion, etc. I
> co
On Mar 24, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Jason Grout
>> wrote:
>>> Jose Guzman wrote:
kcrisman wrote:
>> In looking at your code, I had an idea about specifying
>> colors. Why
>> don't we have some default col
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Jason Grout
>> wrote:
>>> Jose Guzman wrote:
kcrisman wrote:
>> In looking at your code, I had an idea about specifying colors. Why
>> don't we have some default color
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> Jose Guzman wrote:
>>> kcrisman wrote:
> In looking at your code, I had an idea about specifying colors. Why
> don't we have some default color objects defined in Sage, like red,
> blue, yellow, green, et
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> Jose Guzman wrote:
>> kcrisman wrote:
>>>
In looking at your code, I had an idea about specifying colors. Why
don't we have some default color objects defined in Sage, like red,
blue, yellow, green, etc. Methods could includ
Jose Guzman wrote:
> kcrisman wrote:
>>
>>> In looking at your code, I had an idea about specifying colors. Why
>>> don't we have some default color objects defined in Sage, like red,
>>> blue, yellow, green, etc. Methods could include .darker(), .lighter(),
>>> etc. So you could specify a p
kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>> In looking at your code, I had an idea about specifying colors. Why
>> don't we have some default color objects defined in Sage, like red,
>> blue, yellow, green, etc. Methods could include .darker(), .lighter(),
>> etc. So you could specify a plot as:
>>
>> plot(x^2,
> In looking at your code, I had an idea about specifying colors. Why
> don't we have some default color objects defined in Sage, like red,
> blue, yellow, green, etc. Methods could include .darker(), .lighter(),
> etc. So you could specify a plot as:
>
> plot(x^2, (x,0,1), color=red)
> plot(
Jason Grout wrote:
> Jose Guzman wrote:
>
>
>> Yes it works! for some strange reason it did not work in my old sheet. I
>> though to plot one should use a combination of plot() and show()
>> commands. Actually, I created a small tutorial for private use to learn
>> more about sage commands t
Jose Guzman wrote:
> Yes it works! for some strange reason it did not work in my old sheet. I
> though to plot one should use a combination of plot() and show()
> commands. Actually, I created a small tutorial for private use to learn
> more about sage commands to plot, which talks about the u
Jose Guzman wrote:
> Yes it works! for some strange reason it did not work in my old sheet. I
> though to plot one should use a combination of plot() and show()
> commands. Actually, I created a small tutorial for private use to learn
> more about sage commands to plot, which talks about the u
Stan Schymanski wrote:
> The following displays a plot in my notebook (Sage3.4) if I put it all
> in the same cell:
>
> sage: var('t'); # symbolic variable
> sage: var('g'); # symbolic variable
> sage: f(t) = g*(t**2-1)/(2*(t-1)) # try to simplify this function later...
> sage: plot(f.subs(g=9.8
The following displays a plot in my notebook (Sage3.4) if I put it all
in the same cell:
sage: var('t'); # symbolic variable
sage: var('g'); # symbolic variable
sage: f(t) = g*(t**2-1)/(2*(t-1)) # try to simplify this function later...
sage: plot(f.subs(g=9.81), 0, 10)
Does this not work for y
>
> By the way, if you type
>
>sage: plot(f.subs(g=9.81), 0, 10)
>
> then the plot will be displayed -- you don't need to save the plot and
> then 'show' it.
>
>
>
I tried this and it works only with the console. If you use the notebook
you have to use the show() command. Anyway, thank yo
John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Mar 23, 3:31 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> On Mar 23, 3:10 pm, Jose Guzman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Dear Sage users and developers,
>>>
>>> I am using Sage version 3.4 running on Linux/Debian. I am still not very
>>> familiar with Sage though. I t
wrote:
> On Mar 23, 3:10 pm, Jose Guzman wrote:
>
>> Dear Sage users and developers,
>>
>> I am using Sage version 3.4 running on Linux/Debian. I am still not very
>> familiar with Sage though. I tried to plot the following equation:
>>
>> sage: var('t'); # symbolic variable
>> sage: var('g'
On Mar 23, 3:31 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Mar 23, 3:10 pm, Jose Guzman wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dear Sage users and developers,
>
> > I am using Sage version 3.4 running on Linux/Debian. I am still not very
> > familiar with Sage though. I tried to plot the following equation:
>
> > sage: var(
On Mar 23, 3:10 pm, Jose Guzman wrote:
> Dear Sage users and developers,
>
> I am using Sage version 3.4 running on Linux/Debian. I am still not very
> familiar with Sage though. I tried to plot the following equation:
>
> sage: var('t'); # symbolic variable
> sage: var('g'); # symbolic variable
18 matches
Mail list logo
