[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-27 Thread Jason Grout
Chris Seberino wrote: > > > On Apr 27, 2:33 am, Jason Grout wrote: >> I just upgraded to Jaunty over the weekend, and then compiled 3.4.1 from >> scratch. Both expressions work for me: > > Hmm. Does Sage leave a log build regarding the compilation? Perhaps > my build had some errors yours d

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-27 Thread Chris Seberino
On Apr 27, 2:33 am, Jason Grout wrote: > I just upgraded to Jaunty over the weekend, and then compiled 3.4.1 from > scratch.  Both expressions work for me: Hmm. Does Sage leave a log build regarding the compilation? Perhaps my build had some errors yours doesn't have I should look for? cs -

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-27 Thread Jason Grout
mabshoff wrote: > > > On Apr 25, 12:23 am, Paul Zimmermann wrote: >>Michael, > > Hi Paul, > >>> And Sage 3.4: >>> | Sage Version 3.4, Release Date: 2009-03-11 | >>> | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.| >>> -

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-26 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 26, 11:05 pm, Chris Seberino wrote: > On Apr 26, 1:36 am, mabshoff > dortmund.de> wrote: > > I do not see how that rules out clisp 2.47 - or am I just not getting > > what you are driving at :) > > I meant if I can recreate the problem from 3.4 source as well as 3.4.1 > source then does

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-26 Thread Chris Seberino
On Apr 26, 1:36 am, mabshoff wrote: > I do not see how that rules out clisp 2.47 - or am I just not getting > what you are driving at :) I meant if I can recreate the problem from 3.4 source as well as 3.4.1 source then doesn't that mean I can recreate the problem in both version of clisp? He

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-26 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 25, 10:42 pm, Chris Seberino wrote: > On Apr 25, 7:02 pm, mabshoff > dortmund.de> wrote: > > > What should I do until Sage 4.0?  Is there a way to tweak my 3.4.1 to > > > use clisp 2.47? > > > Do you mean clisp 2.46 since 3.4.1 ships with clisp 2.47 while Sage > > 3.4 used clisp 2.46? >

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-25 Thread Chris Seberino
On Apr 25, 7:02 pm, mabshoff wrote: > > What should I do until Sage 4.0?  Is there a way to tweak my 3.4.1 to > > use clisp 2.47? > > Do you mean clisp 2.46 since 3.4.1 ships with clisp 2.47 while Sage > 3.4 used clisp 2.46? Since *I* was able to reproduce the problem on 3.4 on Ubuntu Jaunty

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-25 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 25, 6:38 pm, Chris Seberino wrote: > On Apr 25, 5:36 pm, mabshoff dortmund.de> wrote: > > Not really, we switched from clisp 2.46 to 2.47 and if you look at > > >    https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/t/753a8d2f3c052183 > > > for some people who have had issues for a long, long

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-25 Thread Chris Seberino
On Apr 25, 5:36 pm, mabshoff wrote: > Not really, we switched from clisp 2.46 to 2.47 and if you look at > >    https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/t/753a8d2f3c052183 > > for some people who have had issues for a long, long time we could > never get to the bottom of all the sudden they c

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-25 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 25, 2:17 pm, Chris Seberino wrote: Hi Chris, > On Apr 25, 2:10 am, mabshoff > Hmm. That is weird.  I just compiled 3.4.1 from source and got the > same error on the newer version too. Ok. > That seems to be the only delta between you guys and me so chances are > that's the proble

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-25 Thread Chris Seberino
On Apr 25, 2:10 am, mabshoff wrote: > I ran this on 3.4, 3.4.1 and a couple other rc releases in between: > > sage: for i in (0..200): > :     numerical_integral(sin(pi*exp(x/2)),0,2)[0] > : > > and I could not get a failure. Hmm. That is weird. I just compiled 3.4.1 from source and g

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-25 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 25, 12:23 am, Paul Zimmermann wrote: >        Michael, Hi Paul, > > And Sage 3.4: > > > | Sage Version 3.4, Release Date: 2009-03-11                         | > > | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.        | > >

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-25 Thread Paul Zimmermann
Michael, > And Sage 3.4: > > | Sage Version 3.4, Release Date: 2009-03-11 | > | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.| > -- > sage: numerical_integral(sin(pi*cos(x/2))

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-24 Thread Chris Seberino
On Apr 24, 7:09 pm, mabshoff wrote: > So I cannot reproduce this. What platform are you on and are you using > a binary, build from source, etc? I'm on an Ubuntu 9.04 ThinkPad T41 laptop. I built my Sage install from 3.4 source myself as there was no binary yet for this latest Ubuntu. cs --~

[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

2009-04-24 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 24, 7:03 pm, Chris Seberino wrote: Hi, > Notice first and second are very similar except for the cos() and exp > (). > > Why first one ok but second bombs? > > sage: numerical_integral(sin(pi*cos(x/2)),0,2)[0] > 0.85397903781471396 I guess you are using Sage 3.4? Works for me in my