Oh! I wasn't aware that multivariable power series is a new addition...
Thanks anyway...
-- VInay
On 2 November 2011 21:09, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Vinay Wagh wagh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 November 2011 20:49, Jason Grout
I am not sure whether my problem has anything to do with the topic of
this thread...
I want to define a Power Series Ring over QQ. The following code works
perfectly fine on my local computer (Ubuntu 11.10, Sage Version 4.7.1,
Release Date: 2011-08-11), whereas if I give the same on sagenb.org it
On 11/2/11 10:15 AM, Vinay Wagh wrote:
I am not sure whether my problem has anything to do with the topic of
this thread...
I want to define a Power Series Ring over QQ. The following code works
perfectly fine on my local computer (Ubuntu 11.10, Sage Version 4.7.1,
Release Date: 2011-08-11),
On 2 November 2011 20:49, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 11/2/11 10:15 AM, Vinay Wagh wrote:
I am not sure whether my problem has anything to do with the topic of
this thread...
I want to define a Power Series Ring over QQ. The following code works
perfectly fine on my
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Vinay Wagh wagh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 November 2011 20:49, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 11/2/11 10:15 AM, Vinay Wagh wrote:
I am not sure whether my problem has anything to do with the topic of
this thread...
I want to define a Power
On 26 Okt., 17:47, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Of possible relevance is that the machine that sagenb is running on is
heavily loaded right now, due to me upgrading the system-wide Sage
install on that machine, and building in parallel.
FWIW, slightly off-topic:
Setting MAKE to make
On Thursday, October 27, 2011 11:01:19 AM UTC-4, leif wrote:
On 26 Okt., 17:47, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Setting MAKE to make -jN when (re-)building Sage doesn't limit the
*total* number of build jobs to N;
It does limit the total number of build jobs within the current make.
On Oct 26, 4:47 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:44 AM, MichTex bill.cav...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been using sagenb without difficulty now for several days. I've
been using it again this morning, but just now I started getting the
'could not connect
On 10/27/11 12:56 PM, William Stein wrote:
That's probably because there are over 500 simultaneous open worksheets
right now. I've reset the servers but it will probably get heavily
loaded again soon enough. Obviously we need to start planning for the
next level in scalability...
I wonder
That's probably because there are over 500 simultaneous open worksheets
right now. I've reset the servers but it will probably get heavily loaded
again soon enough. Obviously we need to start planning for the next level
in scalability...
I guess that's a good problem to have...
I wonder
On 27 Okt., 19:12, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, October 27, 2011 11:01:19 AM UTC-4, leif wrote:
Setting MAKE to make -jN when (re-)building Sage doesn't limit the
*total* number of build jobs to N;
It does limit the total number of build jobs within the current
I have been using sagenb without difficulty now for several days. I've
been using it again this morning, but just now I started getting the
'could not connect to www.sagenb.org' message when I tried to save my
worksheet. I tried opening another window to sagenb and got the same
result. After a
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:44 AM, MichTex bill.cav...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been using sagenb without difficulty now for several days. I've
been using it again this morning, but just now I started getting the
'could not connect to www.sagenb.org' message when I tried to save my
worksheet. I
On 10/21/11 10:32 AM, William Stein wrote:
Instantly after doing this *demo* became much faster.
I noticed before doing this that there was a single sagenb server
Python process running in top using a lot of cpu..
For future reference, it would have been *great* to get a stack trace of
the
As I have time, I'll look into where there might be a performance
regression, but there have been a lot of code changes between June and
now, and we haven't seen the performance regression on test.sagenb.org.
Well, there are not very many users on test.sagenb.org. The problem
seems to only
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 10/21/11 10:32 AM, William Stein wrote:
Instantly after doing this *demo* became much faster.
I noticed before doing this that there was a single sagenb server
Python process running in top using a lot of cpu..
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:54 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 10/21/11 10:32 AM, William Stein wrote:
Instantly after doing this *demo* became much faster.
I noticed before doing this that there was
On 10/25/11 12:54 PM, William Stein wrote:
I'm personally not super comfortable with this, especially if I have
to have to be the one responsible for fixing things when they
inevitably break and cause trouble. From the second I switched back
to the old version until now, I haven't had any
On Oct 21, 12:14 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, October 20, 2011, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
demo.sagenb.org is not responding, or at any rate is responding very,
very slowly. This is bad, because I just sent students there (see
I will restart all the
On 10/20/11 9:45 PM, kcrisman wrote:
demo.sagenb.org is not responding, or at any rate is responding very,
very slowly. This is bad, because I just sent students there (see
sage-devel thread) and now they aren't able to do HW :( I assume this
is related to the general sagenb issues?
Then
On 10/20/11 11:14 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Thursday, October 20, 2011, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com
mailto:kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
demo.sagenb.org http://demo.sagenb.org is not responding, or at any
rate is responding very,
very slowly. This is bad, because I just sent students there
On Oct 21, 11:01 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, October 21, 2011, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote: On 10/20/11 11:14 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Thursday, October 20, 2011, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com
mailto:kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
demo.sagenb.org
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 10/20/11 1:02 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 10/20/11 10:07 AM, MichTex wrote:
Thanks! It is back up, although it is still very
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:15 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 21, 11:01 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, October 21, 2011, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote: On 10/20/11 11:14 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Thursday, October 20, 2011, kcrisman
On 10/21/11 10:32 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 10/20/11 1:02 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.comwrote:
On 10/20/11 10:07 AM, MichTex wrote:
On 10/20/11 9:01 AM, MichTex wrote:
I've been trying to login to sagenb this morning. It took over a
minute for the server to respond when I first went to the login page.
After another long wait, it finally logged in. Then when I clicked on
the link to the worksheet that I wanted, there was a
Thanks! It is back up, although it is still very slow. I'm guessing
that it has a heavy load already.
--Bill
On Oct 20, 10:09 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 10/20/11 9:01 AM, MichTex wrote:
I've been trying to login to sagenb this morning. It took over a
minute for
On 10/20/11 10:07 AM, MichTex wrote:
Thanks! It is back up, although it is still very slow. I'm guessing
that it has a heavy load already.
The load isn't particularly heavy---only about 8 people. It was
handling a much bigger load yesterday, for example. The server was even
slow serving
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 10/20/11 10:07 AM, MichTex wrote:
Thanks! It is back up, although it is still very slow. I'm guessing
that it has a heavy load already.
The load isn't particularly heavy---only about 8 people. It was
FWIW, I just tested again, and it seemed a lot snappier -- no delays
at all.
--Bill
On Oct 20, 2:02 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 10/20/11 10:07 AM, MichTex wrote:
Thanks! It is back up,
On 10/20/11 1:02 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 10/20/11 10:07 AM, MichTex wrote:
Thanks! It is back up, although it is still very slow. I'm guessing
that it has a heavy load already.
The load isn't particularly
demo.sagenb.org is not responding, or at any rate is responding very,
very slowly. This is bad, because I just sent students there (see
sage-devel thread) and now they aren't able to do HW :( I assume this
is related to the general sagenb issues?
--
To post to this group, send email to
32 matches
Mail list logo
