On Jan 9, 2009, at 9:21 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Jan 9, 7:03 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:42 PM, John H Palmieri
jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's another question: what is the most efficient way of testing
whether one Set is a subset of
Thank you!
to_poly_solve() is a strong function, and it works fast.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options,
John H Palmieri wrote:
On Jan 9, 3:40 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:36 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is this a bug?
sage: Set([])
{}
sage: Set(Set([]))
{}
On Jan 10, 7:25 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
John H Palmieri wrote:
Here's another question: what is the most efficient way of testing
whether one Set is a subset of another? I can do
S in list(T.subsets())
-- and it's a bit frustrating that I can't do S in
John H Palmieri wrote:
sage: timeit('set(S).issubset(set(T))')
gives me very similar times to the first option (all(s in T for s in
S)). So if I start with Sage sets, I don't seem to gain much by
converting back to python sets for this (not to mention that if S = Set
(ZZ), then set(S)
thank you!
On Jan 9, 7:27 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Sand Wraith omegat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Is it possible to get order of root of equation? For example equation:
f(x)=(x+1)^2
and it's solution solve(f,x) will be [x == -1], but this
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
John H Palmieri wrote:
sage: timeit('set(S).issubset(set(T))')
gives me very similar times to the first option (all(s in T for s in
S)). So if I start with Sage sets, I don't seem to gain much by
converting
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:05 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Robert Dodier robert.dod...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 9, 6:51 am, Slava slava_se...@mail.ru wrote:
I`m trying to solve such simple system of equations: [sqrt(x) == 1, x
== y],
so I type:
Hi, all,
When using the Notebook interface on Mac OS X, I find that once the
cells have filled the visible part of a web page, the notebook becomes
somewhat difficult to deal with. Specifically, if I have an
@interact, and modify the slider, the content of the page shifts down,
William Stein wrote:
Is there any reason not to just *always* use topoly_solver? I.e.,
maybe Sage's solve should just 100% always only call topoly_solver.
What do you think?
to_poly_solve can only handle equations in polynomials and radicals,
while solve can handle a somewhat wider range of
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Justin C. Walker jus...@mac.com wrote:
Hi, all,
When using the Notebook interface on Mac OS X, I find that once the
cells have filled the visible part of a web page, the notebook becomes
somewhat difficult to deal with. Specifically, if I have an
I've been having the same problem with both 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 on my
Intel MacBook running OS X.4.11.
-JoelS
kcrisman wrote:
Dear Support,
I built 3.2.2 and seem to have a worsening of the auto-evaluation of
@interact worksheets. Up to 3.2.1 the worksheets only autoevaluate
interacts if I
Justin C. Walker wrote:
Hi, all,
When using the Notebook interface on Mac OS X, I find that once the
cells have filled the visible part of a web page, the notebook becomes
somewhat difficult to deal with. Specifically, if I have an
@interact, and modify the slider, the content of
On Jan 10, 2009, at 16:26 , Jason Grout wrote:
Justin C. Walker wrote:
Hi, all,
When using the Notebook interface on Mac OS X, I find that once the
cells have filled the visible part of a web page, the notebook
becomes
somewhat difficult to deal with. Specifically, if I have an
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Justin C. Walker wrote:
Hi, all,
When using the Notebook interface on Mac OS X, I find that once the
cells have filled the visible part of a web page, the notebook becomes
somewhat difficult to deal with.
Justin C. Walker wrote:
On Jan 10, 2009, at 16:26 , Jason Grout wrote:
Justin C. Walker wrote:
Hi, all,
When using the Notebook interface on Mac OS X, I find that once the
cells have filled the visible part of a web page, the notebook
becomes
somewhat difficult to deal with.
William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Justin C. Walker wrote:
Hi, all,
When using the Notebook interface on Mac OS X, I find that once the
cells have filled the visible part of a web page, the notebook becomes
somewhat
I am having trouble using the polyfit function. Here are the
commands:
import numpy as np
import scipy as sc
vp = np.array([1.0, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, 40.0, 60.0, 100.0, 200.0, 400.0,
760.0])
T = np.array([-36.7, -19.6, -11.5, -2.6, 7.6, 15.4, 26.1, 42.2, 60.6,
80.1])
(a,b,c,d) =
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 8:29 PM, slybro sntventu...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having trouble using the polyfit function. Here are the
commands:
import numpy as np
import scipy as sc
vp = np.array([1.0, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, 40.0, 60.0, 100.0, 200.0, 400.0,
760.0])
T = np.array([-36.7,
slybro wrote:
I am having trouble using the polyfit function. Here are the
commands:
import numpy as np
import scipy as sc
vp = np.array([1.0, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, 40.0, 60.0, 100.0, 200.0, 400.0,
760.0])
T = np.array([-36.7, -19.6, -11.5, -2.6, 7.6, 15.4, 26.1, 42.2, 60.6,
80.1])
20 matches
Mail list logo
